From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>, Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
Cc: Guo Xuenan <guoxuenan@huawei.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, wangli74@huawei.com,
fangwei1@huawei.com, ming.lei@redhat.com, josef@toxicpanda.com,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] blk-rq-qos: remove redundant finish_wait to rq_qos_wait.
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 09:32:33 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <73fa9772-9b02-fcfa-ea50-6779067ed70a@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200715121942.33bb34d8@canb.auug.org.au>
On 7/14/20 8:19 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Tue, 14 Jul 2020 19:21:24 -0400 Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 09:56:25AM -0400, Guo Xuenan wrote:
>>> It is no need do finish_wait twice after acquiring inflight.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Guo Xuenan <guoxuenan@huawei.com>
>>> ---
>>> block/blk-rq-qos.c | 2 --
>>> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/block/blk-rq-qos.c b/block/blk-rq-qos.c
>>> index 656460636ad3..18f3eab9f768 100644
>>> --- a/block/blk-rq-qos.c
>>> +++ b/block/blk-rq-qos.c
>>> @@ -273,8 +273,6 @@ void rq_qos_wait(struct rq_wait *rqw, void *private_data,
>>> if (data.got_token)
>>> break;
>>> if (!has_sleeper && acquire_inflight_cb(rqw, private_data)) {
>>> - finish_wait(&rqw->wait, &data.wq);
>>> -
>>> /*
>>> * We raced with wbt_wake_function() getting a token,
>>> * which means we now have two. Put our local token
>>> --
>>> 2.25.4
>>
>> Reverting this commit fixed an issue that swapping workloads will stall for
>> days without being able to make any progress below.
>
> I have reverted that commit from linux-next today.
Thanks, I'll revert it locally too.
--
Jens Axboe
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-15 15:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-28 13:56 [PATCH v2] blk-rq-qos: remove redundant finish_wait to rq_qos_wait Guo Xuenan
2020-06-28 14:11 ` Jens Axboe
[not found] ` <20200714232123.GA49251@lca.pw>
2020-07-15 2:19 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-07-15 15:32 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=73fa9772-9b02-fcfa-ea50-6779067ed70a@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=cai@lca.pw \
--cc=fangwei1@huawei.com \
--cc=guoxuenan@huawei.com \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=wangli74@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).