From: Ingo Franzki <ifranzki@linux.ibm.com> To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Juergen Christ <jchrist@linux.ibm.com> Subject: loop_set_block_size: loop0 () has still dirty pages (nrpages=2) Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2021 14:01:29 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <8bed44f2-273c-856e-0018-69f127ea4258@linux.ibm.com> (raw) Hi all, we occasionally encounter a problem when setting up a loop device in one of our automated testcases. We set up a loop device as follows: # dd if=/dev/zero of=/var/tmp/loopbackfile1.img bs=1M count=2500 status=none # losetup --sector-size 4096 -fP --show /var/tmp/loopbackfile1.img This works fine most of the times, but in the seldom case of the error, we get 'losetup: /var/tmp/loopbackfile1.img: failed to set up loop device: Resource temporarily unavailable'. I am sure that no other loop device is currently defined, so we don't run out of loop devices. We also see the following message in the syslog when the error occurs: loop_set_block_size: loop0 () has still dirty pages (nrpages=2) The nrpages number varies from time to time. "Resource temporarily unavailable" is EAGAIN, and function loop_set_block_size() in drivers/block/loop.c returns this after printing the syslog message via pr_warn: static int loop_set_block_size(struct loop_device *lo, unsigned long arg) { int err = 0; if (lo->lo_state != Lo_bound) return -ENXIO; err = loop_validate_block_size(arg); if (err) return err; if (lo->lo_queue->limits.logical_block_size == arg) return 0; sync_blockdev(lo->lo_device); invalidate_bdev(lo->lo_device); blk_mq_freeze_queue(lo->lo_queue); /* invalidate_bdev should have truncated all the pages */ if (lo->lo_device->bd_inode->i_mapping->nrpages) { err = -EAGAIN; pr_warn("%s: loop%d (%s) has still dirty pages (nrpages=%lu)\n", __func__, lo->lo_number, lo->lo_file_name, lo->lo_device->bd_inode->i_mapping->nrpages); goto out_unfreeze; } blk_queue_logical_block_size(lo->lo_queue, arg); blk_queue_physical_block_size(lo->lo_queue, arg); blk_queue_io_min(lo->lo_queue, arg); loop_update_dio(lo); out_unfreeze: blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(lo->lo_queue); return err; } So looks like invalidate_bdev() did actually not truncate all the pages under some circumstances.... The problem only happens when '--sector-size 4096' is specified, with the default sector size is always works. It does not call loop_set_block_size() in the default case I guess. The loop0 device has certainly be used by other testcases before, most likely with the default block size. But at the time of this run, no loop device is currently active (losetup shows nothing). Anyone have an idea what goes wrong here? This happens on upstream kernels on the s390x platform, but I can't tell if is related to the platform or a specific kernel version. The failing use case is not that old, so I can't tell if it would have happened on earlier kernels or not, or since when it happens. Any help is appreciated! -- Ingo Franzki ifranzki@linux.ibm.com Linux on IBM Z Development, Schoenaicher Str. 220, 71032 Boeblingen, Germany IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH / Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Matthias Hartmann Geschäftsführung: Dirk Wittkopp Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen / Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294 IBM DATA Privacy Statement: https://www.ibm.com/privacy/us/en/
next reply other threads:[~2021-06-08 12:01 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-06-08 12:01 Ingo Franzki [this message] 2021-06-10 14:45 ` Ming Lei 2021-06-14 7:35 ` Ingo Franzki 2021-06-14 22:37 ` Ming Lei 2021-06-15 8:06 ` Jan Kara 2021-06-15 8:42 ` Karel Zak 2021-06-16 7:22 ` Ingo Franzki 2021-06-16 7:44 ` Karel Zak
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=8bed44f2-273c-856e-0018-69f127ea4258@linux.ibm.com \ --to=ifranzki@linux.ibm.com \ --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \ --cc=jchrist@linux.ibm.com \ --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --subject='Re: loop_set_block_size: loop0 () has still dirty pages (nrpages=2)' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).