From: Damien Le Moal <Damien.LeMoal@wdc.com>
To: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
"hare@suse.com" <hare@suse.com>,
"axboe@kernel.dk" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
"linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org" <linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org>,
"kbusch@kernel.org" <kbusch@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 3/4] block: remove queue_is_mq restriction from blk_revalidate_disk_zones()
Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 01:07:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BY5PR04MB6900CEAF2B5C87BDF6101711E7B80@BY5PR04MB6900.namprd04.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: d3fe49f1-d37b-689e-ae0e-078b1254d7e7@suse.de
On 2020/05/16 22:14, Coly Li wrote:
> On 2020/5/16 20:40, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 11:54:33AM +0800, Coly Li wrote:
>>> The bcache driver is bio based and NOT request based multiqueued driver,
>>> if a zoned SMR hard drive is used as backing device of a bcache device,
>>> calling blk_revalidate_disk_zones() for the bcache device will fail due
>>> to the following check in blk_revalidate_disk_zones(),
>>> 478 if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!queue_is_mq(q)))
>>> 479 return -EIO;
>>>
>>> Now bcache is able to export the zoned information from the underlying
>>> zoned SMR drives and format zonefs on top of a bcache device, the
>>> resitriction that a zoned device should be multiqueued is unnecessary
>>> for now.
>>>
>>> Although in commit ae58954d8734c ("block: don't handle bio based drivers
>>> in blk_revalidate_disk_zones") it is said that bio based drivers should
>>> not call blk_revalidate_disk_zones() and just manually update their own
>>> q->nr_zones, but this is inaccurate. The bio based drivers also need to
>>> set their zone size and initialize bitmaps for cnv and seq zones, it is
>>> necessary to call blk_revalidate_disk_zones() for bio based drivers.
>>
>> Why would you need these bitmaps for bcache? There is no reason to
>> serialize requests for stacking drivers, and you can already derive
>> if a zone is sequential or not from whatever internal information
>> you use.
>>
>> So without a user that actually makes sense: NAK.
>>
>
> It is OK for me to set the zone_nr and zone size without calling
> blk_revalidate_disk_zones().
Yes, no problem with that.
This is how device mapper BIO based targets handle zoned devices. See
dm_set_device_limits() which uses bdev_stack_limits() for handling chunk_sectors
(zone size) and directly set q->limits.zoned to blk_queue_zoned_model(q) of the
the underlying device. For the number of zones, see dm_table_set_restrictions()
which uses blkdev_nr_zones(t->md->disk) to set q->nr_zones. Note that
blkdev_nr_zones() uses the gendisk capacity of the logical device (the bcache
device in your case) and the zone size, so both must be set first before calling
blkdev_nr_zones().
>
> Coly Li
>
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-18 1:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-16 3:54 [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] block layer change necessary for bcache zoned device support Coly Li
2020-05-16 3:54 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/4] block: change REQ_OP_ZONE_RESET from 6 to 13 Coly Li
2020-05-16 4:06 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2020-05-16 9:33 ` Coly Li
2020-05-16 12:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-16 12:44 ` Coly Li
2020-05-16 12:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-16 13:05 ` Coly Li
2020-05-16 15:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-17 5:30 ` Coly Li
2020-05-18 6:53 ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-05-18 6:56 ` Damien Le Moal
2020-05-18 0:33 ` Damien Le Moal
2020-05-18 5:09 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2020-05-16 3:54 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/4] block: block: change REQ_OP_ZONE_RESET_ALL from 8 to 15 Coly Li
2020-05-18 0:36 ` Damien Le Moal
2020-05-16 3:54 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/4] block: remove queue_is_mq restriction from blk_revalidate_disk_zones() Coly Li
2020-05-16 12:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-16 13:13 ` Coly Li
2020-05-16 15:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-18 1:07 ` Damien Le Moal [this message]
2020-05-18 0:39 ` Damien Le Moal
2020-05-16 3:54 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/4] block: set bi_size to REQ_OP_ZONE_RESET bio Coly Li
2020-05-16 12:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-18 0:59 ` Damien Le Moal
2020-05-18 2:32 ` Coly Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BY5PR04MB6900CEAF2B5C87BDF6101711E7B80@BY5PR04MB6900.namprd04.prod.outlook.com \
--to=damien.lemoal@wdc.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=colyli@suse.de \
--cc=hare@suse.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).