From: Weiping Zhang <zwp10758@gmail.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/3] blkcg: add blk-iotrack
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 00:27:11 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA70yB66fBdAOnv+8rXauwbuPu+UY+gr9ZKeSsQNgq+ZHhJn3Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200326161328.GN162390@mtj.duckdns.org>
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> 于2020年3月27日周五 上午12:15写道:
>
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 11:08:45PM +0800, Weiping Zhang wrote:
> > But iocost_test1 cannot get 8/(8+1) iops, and the total disk iops
> > is 737559 < 79388, even I change rrandiops=637000.
>
> iocost needs QoS targets set especially for deep queue devcies. W/o QoS targets,
> it only throttles when QD is saturated, which might not happen at all depending
> on fio job params.
>
> Can you try with sth like the following in io.cost.qos?
>
> 259:0 enable=1 ctrl=user rpct=95.00 rlat=5000 wpct=50.00 wlat=10000
>
> In case you see significant bw loss, step up the r/wlat params.
>
OK, I'll try it.
I really appreciate that if you help review blk-iotrack.c, or just
drop io.iotrakc.stat
and append these statistics to the io.stat? I think these metrics is usefull,
and it just extend io.stat output.
Thanks a ton
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-26 16:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-21 1:20 [RFC 0/3] blkcg: add blk-iotrack Weiping Zhang
2020-03-21 1:21 ` [RFC 1/3] update the real issue size when bio_split Weiping Zhang
2020-03-21 1:21 ` [RFC 2/3] bio: track timestamp of submitting bio the disk driver Weiping Zhang
2020-03-21 1:21 ` [RFC 3/3] blkcg: add blk-iotrack Weiping Zhang
2020-03-24 18:27 ` [RFC 0/3] " Tejun Heo
2020-03-25 12:49 ` Weiping Zhang
2020-03-25 14:12 ` Tejun Heo
2020-03-25 16:45 ` Weiping Zhang
2020-03-26 15:08 ` Weiping Zhang
2020-03-26 16:14 ` Tejun Heo
2020-03-26 16:27 ` Weiping Zhang [this message]
2020-03-31 14:19 ` Tejun Heo
2020-03-27 6:27 ` [RFC PATCH v2 " Weiping Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAA70yB66fBdAOnv+8rXauwbuPu+UY+gr9ZKeSsQNgq+ZHhJn3Q@mail.gmail.com \
--to=zwp10758@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).