linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Khazhy Kumykov <khazhy@google.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
	Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>,
	John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>,
	"Shin'ichiro Kawasaki" <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] blk-mq: Fix a race between iterating over requests and freeing requests
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2021 20:37:30 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACGdZYKbV6QHaPJveUyf34iwgMRV2sDcSmrue23k=EfSWeLgjA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <229d08ec-7ae9-31f2-9f7c-ae340e372c56@acm.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2346 bytes --]

On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 8:26 PM Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> wrote:
>
> On 4/2/21 4:59 PM, Khazhy Kumykov wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 28, 2021 at 7:00 PM Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> wrote:
> >> @@ -209,7 +209,12 @@ static bool bt_iter(struct sbitmap *bitmap, unsigned int bitnr, void *data)
> >>
> >>         if (!reserved)
> >>                 bitnr += tags->nr_reserved_tags;
> >> -       rq = tags->rqs[bitnr];
> >> +       /*
> >> +        * See also the percpu_ref_tryget() and blk_queue_exit() calls in
> >> +        * blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter().
> >> +        */
> >> +       rq = rcu_dereference_check(tags->rqs[bitnr],
> >> +                       !percpu_ref_is_zero(&hctx->queue->q_usage_counter));
> >
> > do we need to worry about rq->q != hctx->queue here? i.e., could we
> > run into use-after-free on rq->q == hctx->queue check below, since
> > rq->q->q_usage_counter might not be raised? Once we verify rq->q ==
> > hctx->queue, i agree q_usage_counter is sufficient then
>
> That's a great question. I will change the second
> rcu_dereference_check() argument into 'true' and elaborate the comment
> above rcu_dereference_check().
>
> >> -static bool bt_tags_iter(struct sbitmap *bitmap, unsigned int bitnr, void *data)
> >> +static bool __bt_tags_iter(struct sbitmap *bitmap, unsigned int bitnr,
> >> +                          void *data)
> >>  {
> >>         struct bt_tags_iter_data *iter_data = data;
> >>         struct blk_mq_tags *tags = iter_data->tags;
> >> @@ -275,7 +286,7 @@ static bool bt_tags_iter(struct sbitmap *bitmap, unsigned int bitnr, void *data)
> >>         if (iter_data->flags & BT_TAG_ITER_STATIC_RQS)
> >>                 rq = tags->static_rqs[bitnr];
> >>         else
> >> -               rq = tags->rqs[bitnr];
> >> +               rq = rcu_dereference_check(tags->rqs[bitnr], true);
> >
> > lockdep_is_held(&tags->iter_rwsem) ?
>
> I will change the second rcu_dereference_check() argument into the
> following:
>
> rcu_read_lock_held() || lockdep_is_held(&tags->iter_rwsem)
rcu_dereference_check() already has a || rcu_read_lock_held(), fwiw
>
> >> +               /*
> >> +                * Freeing tags happens with the request queue frozen so the
> >> +                * srcu dereference below is protected by the request queue
> >
> > s/srcu/rcu
>
> Thanks, will fix.
>
> Bart.

[-- Attachment #2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 3996 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-03  3:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-29  2:00 [PATCH v4 0/3] blk-mq: Fix a race between iterating over requests and freeing requests Bart Van Assche
2021-03-29  2:00 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] blk-mq: Move the elevator_exit() definition Bart Van Assche
2021-03-29  2:00 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] blk-mq: Introduce atomic variants of the tag iteration functions Bart Van Assche
2021-03-29  2:00 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] blk-mq: Fix a race between iterating over requests and freeing requests Bart Van Assche
2021-04-02 23:59   ` Khazhy Kumykov
2021-04-03  3:25     ` Bart Van Assche
2021-04-03  3:37       ` Khazhy Kumykov [this message]
2021-04-04  1:11         ` Bart Van Assche
2021-03-30 22:30 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] " Bart Van Assche
2021-04-01  0:48 ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
2021-04-01  1:55 ` Martin K. Petersen
2021-04-02 10:00 ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CACGdZYKbV6QHaPJveUyf34iwgMRV2sDcSmrue23k=EfSWeLgjA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=khazhy@google.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com \
    --cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).