linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
To: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
	Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	Linux Block Layer Mailinglist <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux FSDEVEL Mailinglist <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] block: bio: kill BIO_SEG_VALID flag
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2019 06:40:21 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACVXFVOq1ngjpD62SreSZda5k_WJjxOZRHwpqt6si7bRv=O46Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190322131346.20169-2-jthumshirn@suse.de>

On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 9:14 PM Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de> wrote:
>
> From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
>
> Kill the BIO_SEG_VALID flag. We should just use ->bi_phys_segments to tell
> if it's valid or not.
>
> This patch uses -1 to signify it's not.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
> [ jth initialize pc bios with 1 phys segment and WARN if we're submitting
> bios with -1 segments ]
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
> ---
>  block/bio.c               | 15 +++++++++------
>  block/blk-core.c          |  1 +
>  block/blk-merge.c         | 13 ++++++-------
>  drivers/md/raid5.c        |  2 +-
>  include/linux/blk_types.h |  1 -
>  5 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/bio.c b/block/bio.c
> index 71a78d9fb8b7..a79b2bbcffd0 100644
> --- a/block/bio.c
> +++ b/block/bio.c
> @@ -280,6 +280,7 @@ void bio_init(struct bio *bio, struct bio_vec *table,
>               unsigned short max_vecs)
>  {
>         memset(bio, 0, sizeof(*bio));
> +       bio->bi_phys_segments = -1;
>         atomic_set(&bio->__bi_remaining, 1);
>         atomic_set(&bio->__bi_cnt, 1);
>
> @@ -305,6 +306,7 @@ void bio_reset(struct bio *bio)
>         bio_uninit(bio);
>
>         memset(bio, 0, BIO_RESET_BYTES);
> +       bio->bi_phys_segments = -1;
>         bio->bi_flags = flags;
>         atomic_set(&bio->__bi_remaining, 1);
>  }
> @@ -573,7 +575,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(bio_put);
>
>  int bio_phys_segments(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio)
>  {
> -       if (unlikely(!bio_flagged(bio, BIO_SEG_VALID)))
> +       if (unlikely(bio->bi_phys_segments == -1))
>                 blk_recount_segments(q, bio);
>
>         return bio->bi_phys_segments;
> @@ -712,7 +714,10 @@ int bio_add_pc_page(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio, struct page
>         bvec->bv_len = len;
>         bvec->bv_offset = offset;
>         bio->bi_vcnt++;
> -       bio->bi_phys_segments++;
> +       if (bio->bi_phys_segments == -1)
> +               bio->bi_phys_segments = 1;
> +       else
> +               bio->bi_phys_segments++;
>         bio->bi_iter.bi_size += len;
>
>         /*
> @@ -731,7 +736,7 @@ int bio_add_pc_page(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio, struct page
>
>         /* If we may be able to merge these biovecs, force a recount */
>         if (bio->bi_vcnt > 1 && biovec_phys_mergeable(q, bvec - 1, bvec))
> -               bio_clear_flag(bio, BIO_SEG_VALID);
> +               bio->bi_phys_segments = -1;
>
>   done:
>         return len;
> @@ -1913,10 +1918,8 @@ void bio_trim(struct bio *bio, int offset, int size)
>         if (offset == 0 && size == bio->bi_iter.bi_size)
>                 return;
>
> -       bio_clear_flag(bio, BIO_SEG_VALID);
> -
> +       bio->bi_phys_segments = -1;
>         bio_advance(bio, offset << 9);
> -
>         bio->bi_iter.bi_size = size;
>
>         if (bio_integrity(bio))
> diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
> index 4673ebe42255..53372a16dd7c 100644
> --- a/block/blk-core.c
> +++ b/block/blk-core.c
> @@ -1514,6 +1514,7 @@ void blk_rq_bio_prep(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq,
>         else if (bio_op(bio) == REQ_OP_DISCARD)
>                 rq->nr_phys_segments = 1;
>
> +       WARN_ON(rq->nr_phys_segments == -1);
>         rq->__data_len = bio->bi_iter.bi_size;
>         rq->bio = rq->biotail = bio;
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-merge.c b/block/blk-merge.c
> index 1c9d4f0f96ea..16c2ae69c46b 100644
> --- a/block/blk-merge.c
> +++ b/block/blk-merge.c
> @@ -343,7 +343,6 @@ void blk_queue_split(struct request_queue *q, struct bio **bio)
>         /* physical segments can be figured out during splitting */
>         res = split ? split : *bio;
>         res->bi_phys_segments = nsegs;
> -       bio_set_flag(res, BIO_SEG_VALID);
>
>         if (split) {
>                 /* there isn't chance to merge the splitted bio */
> @@ -440,8 +439,6 @@ void blk_recount_segments(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio)
>         bio->bi_next = NULL;
>         bio->bi_phys_segments = __blk_recalc_rq_segments(q, bio);
>         bio->bi_next = nxt;
> -
> -       bio_set_flag(bio, BIO_SEG_VALID);
>  }
>
>  static int blk_phys_contig_segment(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio,
> @@ -620,6 +617,8 @@ static inline int ll_new_hw_segment(struct request_queue *q,
>  {
>         int nr_phys_segs = bio_phys_segments(q, bio);
>
> +       if (WARN_ON(nr_phys_segs == -1))
> +               nr_phys_segs = 0;
>         if (req->nr_phys_segments + nr_phys_segs > queue_max_segments(q))
>                 goto no_merge;
>
> @@ -651,9 +650,9 @@ int ll_back_merge_fn(struct request_queue *q, struct request *req,
>                 req_set_nomerge(q, req);
>                 return 0;
>         }
> -       if (!bio_flagged(req->biotail, BIO_SEG_VALID))
> +       if (req->biotail->bi_phys_segments == -1)
>                 blk_recount_segments(q, req->biotail);
> -       if (!bio_flagged(bio, BIO_SEG_VALID))
> +       if (bio->bi_phys_segments == -1)
>                 blk_recount_segments(q, bio);
>
>         return ll_new_hw_segment(q, req, bio);
> @@ -673,9 +672,9 @@ int ll_front_merge_fn(struct request_queue *q, struct request *req,
>                 req_set_nomerge(q, req);
>                 return 0;
>         }
> -       if (!bio_flagged(bio, BIO_SEG_VALID))
> +       if (bio->bi_phys_segments == -1)
>                 blk_recount_segments(q, bio);
> -       if (!bio_flagged(req->bio, BIO_SEG_VALID))
> +       if (req->bio->bi_phys_segments == -1)
>                 blk_recount_segments(q, req->bio);
>
>         return ll_new_hw_segment(q, req, bio);
> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
> index c033bfcb209e..79eb54dcf0f9 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
> @@ -5247,7 +5247,7 @@ static int raid5_read_one_chunk(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *raid_bio)
>                 rcu_read_unlock();
>                 raid_bio->bi_next = (void*)rdev;
>                 bio_set_dev(align_bi, rdev->bdev);
> -               bio_clear_flag(align_bi, BIO_SEG_VALID);
> +               align_bi->bi_phys_segments = -1;
>
>                 if (is_badblock(rdev, align_bi->bi_iter.bi_sector,
>                                 bio_sectors(align_bi),
> diff --git a/include/linux/blk_types.h b/include/linux/blk_types.h
> index d66bf5f32610..472059e92071 100644
> --- a/include/linux/blk_types.h
> +++ b/include/linux/blk_types.h
> @@ -215,7 +215,6 @@ struct bio {
>  /*
>   * bio flags
>   */
> -#define BIO_SEG_VALID  1       /* bi_phys_segments valid */
>  #define BIO_CLONED     2       /* doesn't own data */
>  #define BIO_BOUNCED    3       /* bio is a bounce bio */
>  #define BIO_USER_MAPPED 4      /* contains user pages */

Some drivers set max segments as USHRT_MAX, will this patch break this
kind of driver?

Thanks,
Ming Lei

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-03-22 22:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-22 13:13 [PATCH v2 0/3] add flag for tracking bio allocation Johannes Thumshirn
2019-03-22 13:13 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] block: bio: kill BIO_SEG_VALID flag Johannes Thumshirn
2019-03-22 14:01   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-03-25  8:02     ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-03-22 14:06   ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-03-22 22:00   ` Jens Axboe
2019-03-23 19:31     ` Jens Axboe
2019-03-25 13:32       ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-03-22 22:40   ` Ming Lei [this message]
2019-03-22 13:13 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] block: bio: ensure newly added bio flags don't override BVEC_POOL_IDX Johannes Thumshirn
2019-03-22 14:01   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-03-22 14:07   ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-03-22 13:13 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] block: bio: introduce BIO_ALLOCED flag and check it in bio_free Johannes Thumshirn
2019-03-22 14:02   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-03-22 14:05     ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-03-22 21:30       ` Keith Busch
2019-03-22 23:04         ` Ming Lei
2019-03-22 14:10   ` Hannes Reinecke

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CACVXFVOq1ngjpD62SreSZda5k_WJjxOZRHwpqt6si7bRv=O46Q@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
    --cc=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jthumshirn@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).