From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lf0-f68.google.com ([209.85.215.68]:37351 "EHLO mail-lf0-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753444AbdK3Qu6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Nov 2017 11:50:58 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20171129232356.28296-1-mcgrof@kernel.org> From: Yu Chen Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2017 00:50:55 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] fs: use freeze_fs on suspend/hibernate To: Jiri Kosina Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" , viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, bart.vanassche@wdc.com, ming.lei@redhat.com, tytso@mit.edu, darrick.wong@oracle.com, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Pavel Machek , Len Brown , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, jgross@suse.com, todd.e.brandt@linux.intel.com, nborisov@suse.com, jack@suse.cz, martin.petersen@oracle.com, ONeukum@suse.com, oleksandr@natalenko.name, oleg.b.antonyan@gmail.com, Dan Williams , Linux PM list , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Zhang Rui Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-block-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-block@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 12:41 AM, Jiri Kosina wrote: > On Fri, 1 Dec 2017, Yu Chen wrote: > >> BTW, is nfs able to be included in this set? I also encountered a >> freeze() failure due to nfs access during that stage recently. > > The freezer usage in NFS is magnitudes more complicated, so it makes sense > to first go after the lower hanging fruit to figure out the viability of > the whole aproach in practice. Ok, thanks!