[PATCH v3 1/1] virtio-blk: avoid preallocating big SGL for data

[PATCH v3 1/1] virtio-blk: avoid preallocating big SGL for data

[Max Gurtovoy]

No need to pre-allocate a big buffer for the IO SGL anymore. If a device
has lots of deep queues, preallocation for the sg list can consume
substantial amounts of memory. For HW virtio-blk device, nr_hw_queues
can be 64 or 128 and each queue's depth might be 128. This means the
resulting preallocation for the data SGLs is big.

Switch to runtime allocation for SGL for lists longer than 2 entries.
This is the approach used by NVMe drivers so it should be reasonable for
virtio block as well. Runtime SGL allocation has always been the case
for the legacy I/O path so this is nothing new.

The preallocated small SGL depends on SG_CHAIN so if the ARCH doesn't
support SG_CHAIN, use only runtime allocation for the SGL.

Re-organize the setup of the IO request to fit the new sg chain
mechanism.

No performance degradation was seen (fio libaio engine with 16 jobs and
128 iodepth):

IO size      IOPs Rand Read (before/after)         IOPs Rand Write (before/after)
--------     ---------------------------------    ----------------------------------
512B          318K/316K                                    329K/325K

4KB           323K/321K                                    353K/349K

16KB          199K/208K                                    250K/275K

128KB         36K/36.1K                                    39.2K/41.7K

Signed-off-by: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Israel Rukshin <israelr@nvidia.com>
---

changes from V2:
 - initialize vbr->out_hdr.sector during virtblk_setup_cmd

changes from V1:
 - Kconfig update (from Christoph)
 - Re-order cmd setup (from Christoph)
 - use flexible sg pointer in the cmd (from Christoph)
 - added perf numbers to commit msg (from Feng Li)

---
 drivers/block/Kconfig      |   1 +
 drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 155 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 2 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/block/Kconfig b/drivers/block/Kconfig
index 63056cfd4b62..ca25a122b8ee 100644
--- a/drivers/block/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/block/Kconfig
@@ -395,6 +395,7 @@ config XEN_BLKDEV_BACKEND
 config VIRTIO_BLK
 	tristate "Virtio block driver"
 	depends on VIRTIO
+	select SG_POOL
 	help
 	  This is the virtual block driver for virtio.  It can be used with
           QEMU based VMMs (like KVM or Xen).  Say Y or M.
diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
index 9332fc4e9b31..bdd6d415bd20 100644
--- a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
+++ b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
@@ -24,6 +24,12 @@
 /* The maximum number of sg elements that fit into a virtqueue */
 #define VIRTIO_BLK_MAX_SG_ELEMS 32768
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_NO_SG_CHAIN
+#define VIRTIO_BLK_INLINE_SG_CNT	0
+#else
+#define VIRTIO_BLK_INLINE_SG_CNT	2
+#endif
+
 static int virtblk_queue_count_set(const char *val,
 		const struct kernel_param *kp)
 {
@@ -93,6 +99,7 @@ struct virtio_blk {
 struct virtblk_req {
 	struct virtio_blk_outhdr out_hdr;
 	u8 status;
+	struct sg_table sg_table;
 	struct scatterlist sg[];
 };
 
@@ -178,15 +185,94 @@ static int virtblk_setup_discard_write_zeroes(struct request *req, bool unmap)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static inline void virtblk_request_done(struct request *req)
+static void virtblk_unmap_data(struct request *req, struct virtblk_req *vbr)
 {
-	struct virtblk_req *vbr = blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(req);
+	if (blk_rq_nr_phys_segments(req))
+		sg_free_table_chained(&vbr->sg_table,
+				      VIRTIO_BLK_INLINE_SG_CNT);
+}
+
+static int virtblk_map_data(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, struct request *req,
+		struct virtblk_req *vbr)
+{
+	int err;
+
+	if (!blk_rq_nr_phys_segments(req))
+		return 0;
+
+	vbr->sg_table.sgl = vbr->sg;
+	err = sg_alloc_table_chained(&vbr->sg_table,
+				     blk_rq_nr_phys_segments(req),
+				     vbr->sg_table.sgl,
+				     VIRTIO_BLK_INLINE_SG_CNT);
+	if (unlikely(err))
+		return -ENOMEM;
 
+	return blk_rq_map_sg(hctx->queue, req, vbr->sg_table.sgl);
+}
+
+static void virtblk_cleanup_cmd(struct request *req)
+{
 	if (req->rq_flags & RQF_SPECIAL_PAYLOAD) {
 		kfree(page_address(req->special_vec.bv_page) +
 		      req->special_vec.bv_offset);
 	}
+}
+
+static int virtblk_setup_cmd(struct virtio_device *vdev, struct request *req,
+		struct virtblk_req *vbr)
+{
+	bool unmap = false;
+	u32 type;
+
+	vbr->out_hdr.sector = 0;
+
+	switch (req_op(req)) {
+	case REQ_OP_READ:
+		type = VIRTIO_BLK_T_IN;
+		vbr->out_hdr.sector = cpu_to_virtio64(vdev,
+						      blk_rq_pos(req));
+		break;
+	case REQ_OP_WRITE:
+		type = VIRTIO_BLK_T_OUT;
+		vbr->out_hdr.sector = cpu_to_virtio64(vdev,
+						      blk_rq_pos(req));
+		break;
+	case REQ_OP_FLUSH:
+		type = VIRTIO_BLK_T_FLUSH;
+		break;
+	case REQ_OP_DISCARD:
+		type = VIRTIO_BLK_T_DISCARD;
+		break;
+	case REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES:
+		type = VIRTIO_BLK_T_WRITE_ZEROES;
+		unmap = !(req->cmd_flags & REQ_NOUNMAP);
+		break;
+	case REQ_OP_DRV_IN:
+		type = VIRTIO_BLK_T_GET_ID;
+		break;
+	default:
+		WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
+		return BLK_STS_IOERR;
+	}
 
+	vbr->out_hdr.type = cpu_to_virtio32(vdev, type);
+	vbr->out_hdr.ioprio = cpu_to_virtio32(vdev, req_get_ioprio(req));
+
+	if (type == VIRTIO_BLK_T_DISCARD || type == VIRTIO_BLK_T_WRITE_ZEROES) {
+		if (virtblk_setup_discard_write_zeroes(req, unmap))
+			return BLK_STS_RESOURCE;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static inline void virtblk_request_done(struct request *req)
+{
+	struct virtblk_req *vbr = blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(req);
+
+	virtblk_unmap_data(req, vbr);
+	virtblk_cleanup_cmd(req);
 	blk_mq_end_request(req, virtblk_result(vbr));
 }
 
@@ -244,57 +330,23 @@ static blk_status_t virtio_queue_rq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
 	int qid = hctx->queue_num;
 	int err;
 	bool notify = false;
-	bool unmap = false;
-	u32 type;
 
 	BUG_ON(req->nr_phys_segments + 2 > vblk->sg_elems);
 
-	switch (req_op(req)) {
-	case REQ_OP_READ:
-	case REQ_OP_WRITE:
-		type = 0;
-		break;
-	case REQ_OP_FLUSH:
-		type = VIRTIO_BLK_T_FLUSH;
-		break;
-	case REQ_OP_DISCARD:
-		type = VIRTIO_BLK_T_DISCARD;
-		break;
-	case REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES:
-		type = VIRTIO_BLK_T_WRITE_ZEROES;
-		unmap = !(req->cmd_flags & REQ_NOUNMAP);
-		break;
-	case REQ_OP_DRV_IN:
-		type = VIRTIO_BLK_T_GET_ID;
-		break;
-	default:
-		WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
-		return BLK_STS_IOERR;
-	}
-
-	vbr->out_hdr.type = cpu_to_virtio32(vblk->vdev, type);
-	vbr->out_hdr.sector = type ?
-		0 : cpu_to_virtio64(vblk->vdev, blk_rq_pos(req));
-	vbr->out_hdr.ioprio = cpu_to_virtio32(vblk->vdev, req_get_ioprio(req));
+	err = virtblk_setup_cmd(vblk->vdev, req, vbr);
+	if (unlikely(err))
+		return err;
 
 	blk_mq_start_request(req);
 
-	if (type == VIRTIO_BLK_T_DISCARD || type == VIRTIO_BLK_T_WRITE_ZEROES) {
-		err = virtblk_setup_discard_write_zeroes(req, unmap);
-		if (err)
-			return BLK_STS_RESOURCE;
-	}
-
-	num = blk_rq_map_sg(hctx->queue, req, vbr->sg);
-	if (num) {
-		if (rq_data_dir(req) == WRITE)
-			vbr->out_hdr.type |= cpu_to_virtio32(vblk->vdev, VIRTIO_BLK_T_OUT);
-		else
-			vbr->out_hdr.type |= cpu_to_virtio32(vblk->vdev, VIRTIO_BLK_T_IN);
+	num = virtblk_map_data(hctx, req, vbr);
+	if (unlikely(num < 0)) {
+		virtblk_cleanup_cmd(req);
+		return BLK_STS_RESOURCE;
 	}
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&vblk->vqs[qid].lock, flags);
-	err = virtblk_add_req(vblk->vqs[qid].vq, vbr, vbr->sg, num);
+	err = virtblk_add_req(vblk->vqs[qid].vq, vbr, vbr->sg_table.sgl, num);
 	if (err) {
 		virtqueue_kick(vblk->vqs[qid].vq);
 		/* Don't stop the queue if -ENOMEM: we may have failed to
@@ -303,6 +355,8 @@ static blk_status_t virtio_queue_rq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
 		if (err == -ENOSPC)
 			blk_mq_stop_hw_queue(hctx);
 		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vblk->vqs[qid].lock, flags);
+		virtblk_unmap_data(req, vbr);
+		virtblk_cleanup_cmd(req);
 		switch (err) {
 		case -ENOSPC:
 			return BLK_STS_DEV_RESOURCE;
@@ -681,16 +735,6 @@ static const struct attribute_group *virtblk_attr_groups[] = {
 	NULL,
 };
 
-static int virtblk_init_request(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set, struct request *rq,
-		unsigned int hctx_idx, unsigned int numa_node)
-{
-	struct virtio_blk *vblk = set->driver_data;
-	struct virtblk_req *vbr = blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(rq);
-
-	sg_init_table(vbr->sg, vblk->sg_elems);
-	return 0;
-}
-
 static int virtblk_map_queues(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set)
 {
 	struct virtio_blk *vblk = set->driver_data;
@@ -703,7 +747,6 @@ static const struct blk_mq_ops virtio_mq_ops = {
 	.queue_rq	= virtio_queue_rq,
 	.commit_rqs	= virtio_commit_rqs,
 	.complete	= virtblk_request_done,
-	.init_request	= virtblk_init_request,
 	.map_queues	= virtblk_map_queues,
 };
 
@@ -783,7 +826,7 @@ static int virtblk_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
 	vblk->tag_set.flags = BLK_MQ_F_SHOULD_MERGE;
 	vblk->tag_set.cmd_size =
 		sizeof(struct virtblk_req) +
-		sizeof(struct scatterlist) * sg_elems;
+		sizeof(struct scatterlist) * VIRTIO_BLK_INLINE_SG_CNT;
 	vblk->tag_set.driver_data = vblk;
 	vblk->tag_set.nr_hw_queues = vblk->num_vqs;
 
-- 
2.18.1

Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] virtio-blk: avoid preallocating big SGL for data

[Michael S. Tsirkin]

On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 04:14:34PM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
> No need to pre-allocate a big buffer for the IO SGL anymore. If a device
> has lots of deep queues, preallocation for the sg list can consume
> substantial amounts of memory. For HW virtio-blk device, nr_hw_queues
> can be 64 or 128 and each queue's depth might be 128. This means the
> resulting preallocation for the data SGLs is big.
> 
> Switch to runtime allocation for SGL for lists longer than 2 entries.
> This is the approach used by NVMe drivers so it should be reasonable for
> virtio block as well. Runtime SGL allocation has always been the case
> for the legacy I/O path so this is nothing new.
> 
> The preallocated small SGL depends on SG_CHAIN so if the ARCH doesn't
> support SG_CHAIN, use only runtime allocation for the SGL.
> 
> Re-organize the setup of the IO request to fit the new sg chain
> mechanism.
> 
> No performance degradation was seen (fio libaio engine with 16 jobs and
> 128 iodepth):
> 
> IO size      IOPs Rand Read (before/after)         IOPs Rand Write (before/after)
> --------     ---------------------------------    ----------------------------------
> 512B          318K/316K                                    329K/325K
> 
> 4KB           323K/321K                                    353K/349K
> 
> 16KB          199K/208K                                    250K/275K
> 
> 128KB         36K/36.1K                                    39.2K/41.7K
> 
> Signed-off-by: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Israel Rukshin <israelr@nvidia.com>

Could you use something to give confidence intervals maybe?
As it is it looks like a 1-2% regression for 512B and 4KB.



> ---
> 
> changes from V2:
>  - initialize vbr->out_hdr.sector during virtblk_setup_cmd
> 
> changes from V1:
>  - Kconfig update (from Christoph)
>  - Re-order cmd setup (from Christoph)
>  - use flexible sg pointer in the cmd (from Christoph)
>  - added perf numbers to commit msg (from Feng Li)
> 
> ---
>  drivers/block/Kconfig      |   1 +
>  drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 155 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>  2 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/block/Kconfig b/drivers/block/Kconfig
> index 63056cfd4b62..ca25a122b8ee 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/block/Kconfig
> @@ -395,6 +395,7 @@ config XEN_BLKDEV_BACKEND
>  config VIRTIO_BLK
>  	tristate "Virtio block driver"
>  	depends on VIRTIO
> +	select SG_POOL
>  	help
>  	  This is the virtual block driver for virtio.  It can be used with
>            QEMU based VMMs (like KVM or Xen).  Say Y or M.
> diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
> index 9332fc4e9b31..bdd6d415bd20 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
> @@ -24,6 +24,12 @@
>  /* The maximum number of sg elements that fit into a virtqueue */
>  #define VIRTIO_BLK_MAX_SG_ELEMS 32768
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_NO_SG_CHAIN
> +#define VIRTIO_BLK_INLINE_SG_CNT	0
> +#else
> +#define VIRTIO_BLK_INLINE_SG_CNT	2
> +#endif
> +
>  static int virtblk_queue_count_set(const char *val,
>  		const struct kernel_param *kp)
>  {
> @@ -93,6 +99,7 @@ struct virtio_blk {
>  struct virtblk_req {
>  	struct virtio_blk_outhdr out_hdr;
>  	u8 status;
> +	struct sg_table sg_table;
>  	struct scatterlist sg[];
>  };
>  
> @@ -178,15 +185,94 @@ static int virtblk_setup_discard_write_zeroes(struct request *req, bool unmap)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static inline void virtblk_request_done(struct request *req)
> +static void virtblk_unmap_data(struct request *req, struct virtblk_req *vbr)
>  {
> -	struct virtblk_req *vbr = blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(req);
> +	if (blk_rq_nr_phys_segments(req))
> +		sg_free_table_chained(&vbr->sg_table,
> +				      VIRTIO_BLK_INLINE_SG_CNT);
> +}
> +
> +static int virtblk_map_data(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, struct request *req,
> +		struct virtblk_req *vbr)
> +{
> +	int err;
> +
> +	if (!blk_rq_nr_phys_segments(req))
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	vbr->sg_table.sgl = vbr->sg;
> +	err = sg_alloc_table_chained(&vbr->sg_table,
> +				     blk_rq_nr_phys_segments(req),
> +				     vbr->sg_table.sgl,
> +				     VIRTIO_BLK_INLINE_SG_CNT);
> +	if (unlikely(err))
> +		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> +	return blk_rq_map_sg(hctx->queue, req, vbr->sg_table.sgl);
> +}
> +
> +static void virtblk_cleanup_cmd(struct request *req)
> +{
>  	if (req->rq_flags & RQF_SPECIAL_PAYLOAD) {
>  		kfree(page_address(req->special_vec.bv_page) +
>  		      req->special_vec.bv_offset);
>  	}
> +}
> +
> +static int virtblk_setup_cmd(struct virtio_device *vdev, struct request *req,
> +		struct virtblk_req *vbr)
> +{
> +	bool unmap = false;
> +	u32 type;
> +
> +	vbr->out_hdr.sector = 0;
> +
> +	switch (req_op(req)) {
> +	case REQ_OP_READ:
> +		type = VIRTIO_BLK_T_IN;
> +		vbr->out_hdr.sector = cpu_to_virtio64(vdev,
> +						      blk_rq_pos(req));
> +		break;
> +	case REQ_OP_WRITE:
> +		type = VIRTIO_BLK_T_OUT;
> +		vbr->out_hdr.sector = cpu_to_virtio64(vdev,
> +						      blk_rq_pos(req));
> +		break;
> +	case REQ_OP_FLUSH:
> +		type = VIRTIO_BLK_T_FLUSH;
> +		break;
> +	case REQ_OP_DISCARD:
> +		type = VIRTIO_BLK_T_DISCARD;
> +		break;
> +	case REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES:
> +		type = VIRTIO_BLK_T_WRITE_ZEROES;
> +		unmap = !(req->cmd_flags & REQ_NOUNMAP);
> +		break;
> +	case REQ_OP_DRV_IN:
> +		type = VIRTIO_BLK_T_GET_ID;
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
> +		return BLK_STS_IOERR;
> +	}
>  
> +	vbr->out_hdr.type = cpu_to_virtio32(vdev, type);
> +	vbr->out_hdr.ioprio = cpu_to_virtio32(vdev, req_get_ioprio(req));
> +
> +	if (type == VIRTIO_BLK_T_DISCARD || type == VIRTIO_BLK_T_WRITE_ZEROES) {
> +		if (virtblk_setup_discard_write_zeroes(req, unmap))
> +			return BLK_STS_RESOURCE;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void virtblk_request_done(struct request *req)
> +{
> +	struct virtblk_req *vbr = blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(req);
> +
> +	virtblk_unmap_data(req, vbr);
> +	virtblk_cleanup_cmd(req);
>  	blk_mq_end_request(req, virtblk_result(vbr));
>  }
>  
> @@ -244,57 +330,23 @@ static blk_status_t virtio_queue_rq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
>  	int qid = hctx->queue_num;
>  	int err;
>  	bool notify = false;
> -	bool unmap = false;
> -	u32 type;
>  
>  	BUG_ON(req->nr_phys_segments + 2 > vblk->sg_elems);
>  
> -	switch (req_op(req)) {
> -	case REQ_OP_READ:
> -	case REQ_OP_WRITE:
> -		type = 0;
> -		break;
> -	case REQ_OP_FLUSH:
> -		type = VIRTIO_BLK_T_FLUSH;
> -		break;
> -	case REQ_OP_DISCARD:
> -		type = VIRTIO_BLK_T_DISCARD;
> -		break;
> -	case REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES:
> -		type = VIRTIO_BLK_T_WRITE_ZEROES;
> -		unmap = !(req->cmd_flags & REQ_NOUNMAP);
> -		break;
> -	case REQ_OP_DRV_IN:
> -		type = VIRTIO_BLK_T_GET_ID;
> -		break;
> -	default:
> -		WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
> -		return BLK_STS_IOERR;
> -	}
> -
> -	vbr->out_hdr.type = cpu_to_virtio32(vblk->vdev, type);
> -	vbr->out_hdr.sector = type ?
> -		0 : cpu_to_virtio64(vblk->vdev, blk_rq_pos(req));
> -	vbr->out_hdr.ioprio = cpu_to_virtio32(vblk->vdev, req_get_ioprio(req));
> +	err = virtblk_setup_cmd(vblk->vdev, req, vbr);
> +	if (unlikely(err))
> +		return err;
>  
>  	blk_mq_start_request(req);
>  
> -	if (type == VIRTIO_BLK_T_DISCARD || type == VIRTIO_BLK_T_WRITE_ZEROES) {
> -		err = virtblk_setup_discard_write_zeroes(req, unmap);
> -		if (err)
> -			return BLK_STS_RESOURCE;
> -	}
> -
> -	num = blk_rq_map_sg(hctx->queue, req, vbr->sg);
> -	if (num) {
> -		if (rq_data_dir(req) == WRITE)
> -			vbr->out_hdr.type |= cpu_to_virtio32(vblk->vdev, VIRTIO_BLK_T_OUT);
> -		else
> -			vbr->out_hdr.type |= cpu_to_virtio32(vblk->vdev, VIRTIO_BLK_T_IN);
> +	num = virtblk_map_data(hctx, req, vbr);
> +	if (unlikely(num < 0)) {
> +		virtblk_cleanup_cmd(req);
> +		return BLK_STS_RESOURCE;
>  	}
>  
>  	spin_lock_irqsave(&vblk->vqs[qid].lock, flags);
> -	err = virtblk_add_req(vblk->vqs[qid].vq, vbr, vbr->sg, num);
> +	err = virtblk_add_req(vblk->vqs[qid].vq, vbr, vbr->sg_table.sgl, num);
>  	if (err) {
>  		virtqueue_kick(vblk->vqs[qid].vq);
>  		/* Don't stop the queue if -ENOMEM: we may have failed to
> @@ -303,6 +355,8 @@ static blk_status_t virtio_queue_rq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
>  		if (err == -ENOSPC)
>  			blk_mq_stop_hw_queue(hctx);
>  		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vblk->vqs[qid].lock, flags);
> +		virtblk_unmap_data(req, vbr);
> +		virtblk_cleanup_cmd(req);
>  		switch (err) {
>  		case -ENOSPC:
>  			return BLK_STS_DEV_RESOURCE;
> @@ -681,16 +735,6 @@ static const struct attribute_group *virtblk_attr_groups[] = {
>  	NULL,
>  };
>  
> -static int virtblk_init_request(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set, struct request *rq,
> -		unsigned int hctx_idx, unsigned int numa_node)
> -{
> -	struct virtio_blk *vblk = set->driver_data;
> -	struct virtblk_req *vbr = blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(rq);
> -
> -	sg_init_table(vbr->sg, vblk->sg_elems);
> -	return 0;
> -}
> -
>  static int virtblk_map_queues(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set)
>  {
>  	struct virtio_blk *vblk = set->driver_data;
> @@ -703,7 +747,6 @@ static const struct blk_mq_ops virtio_mq_ops = {
>  	.queue_rq	= virtio_queue_rq,
>  	.commit_rqs	= virtio_commit_rqs,
>  	.complete	= virtblk_request_done,
> -	.init_request	= virtblk_init_request,
>  	.map_queues	= virtblk_map_queues,
>  };
>  
> @@ -783,7 +826,7 @@ static int virtblk_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
>  	vblk->tag_set.flags = BLK_MQ_F_SHOULD_MERGE;
>  	vblk->tag_set.cmd_size =
>  		sizeof(struct virtblk_req) +
> -		sizeof(struct scatterlist) * sg_elems;
> +		sizeof(struct scatterlist) * VIRTIO_BLK_INLINE_SG_CNT;
>  	vblk->tag_set.driver_data = vblk;
>  	vblk->tag_set.nr_hw_queues = vblk->num_vqs;
>  
> -- 
> 2.18.1

Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] virtio-blk: avoid preallocating big SGL for data

[Max Gurtovoy]

On 9/1/2021 5:50 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 04:14:34PM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
>> No need to pre-allocate a big buffer for the IO SGL anymore. If a device
>> has lots of deep queues, preallocation for the sg list can consume
>> substantial amounts of memory. For HW virtio-blk device, nr_hw_queues
>> can be 64 or 128 and each queue's depth might be 128. This means the
>> resulting preallocation for the data SGLs is big.
>>
>> Switch to runtime allocation for SGL for lists longer than 2 entries.
>> This is the approach used by NVMe drivers so it should be reasonable for
>> virtio block as well. Runtime SGL allocation has always been the case
>> for the legacy I/O path so this is nothing new.
>>
>> The preallocated small SGL depends on SG_CHAIN so if the ARCH doesn't
>> support SG_CHAIN, use only runtime allocation for the SGL.
>>
>> Re-organize the setup of the IO request to fit the new sg chain
>> mechanism.
>>
>> No performance degradation was seen (fio libaio engine with 16 jobs and
>> 128 iodepth):
>>
>> IO size      IOPs Rand Read (before/after)         IOPs Rand Write (before/after)
>> --------     ---------------------------------    ----------------------------------
>> 512B          318K/316K                                    329K/325K
>>
>> 4KB           323K/321K                                    353K/349K
>>
>> 16KB          199K/208K                                    250K/275K
>>
>> 128KB         36K/36.1K                                    39.2K/41.7K
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Israel Rukshin <israelr@nvidia.com>
> Could you use something to give confidence intervals maybe?
> As it is it looks like a 1-2% regression for 512B and 4KB.

1%-2% is not a regression. It's a device/env/test variance.

This is just one test results. I run it many times and got difference by 
+/- 2%-3% in each run for each sides.

Even if I run same driver without changes I get 2%-3% difference between 
runs.

If you have a perf test suite for virtio-blk it will be great if you can 
run it, or maybe Feng Li has.

>
>
>
>> ---
>>
>> changes from V2:
>>   - initialize vbr->out_hdr.sector during virtblk_setup_cmd
>>
>> changes from V1:
>>   - Kconfig update (from Christoph)
>>   - Re-order cmd setup (from Christoph)
>>   - use flexible sg pointer in the cmd (from Christoph)
>>   - added perf numbers to commit msg (from Feng Li)
>>
>> ---
>>   drivers/block/Kconfig      |   1 +
>>   drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 155 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>>   2 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/block/Kconfig b/drivers/block/Kconfig
>> index 63056cfd4b62..ca25a122b8ee 100644
>> --- a/drivers/block/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/block/Kconfig
>> @@ -395,6 +395,7 @@ config XEN_BLKDEV_BACKEND
>>   config VIRTIO_BLK
>>   	tristate "Virtio block driver"
>>   	depends on VIRTIO
>> +	select SG_POOL
>>   	help
>>   	  This is the virtual block driver for virtio.  It can be used with
>>             QEMU based VMMs (like KVM or Xen).  Say Y or M.
>> diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
>> index 9332fc4e9b31..bdd6d415bd20 100644
>> --- a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
>> +++ b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
>> @@ -24,6 +24,12 @@
>>   /* The maximum number of sg elements that fit into a virtqueue */
>>   #define VIRTIO_BLK_MAX_SG_ELEMS 32768
>>   
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_NO_SG_CHAIN
>> +#define VIRTIO_BLK_INLINE_SG_CNT	0
>> +#else
>> +#define VIRTIO_BLK_INLINE_SG_CNT	2
>> +#endif
>> +
>>   static int virtblk_queue_count_set(const char *val,
>>   		const struct kernel_param *kp)
>>   {
>> @@ -93,6 +99,7 @@ struct virtio_blk {
>>   struct virtblk_req {
>>   	struct virtio_blk_outhdr out_hdr;
>>   	u8 status;
>> +	struct sg_table sg_table;
>>   	struct scatterlist sg[];
>>   };
>>   
>> @@ -178,15 +185,94 @@ static int virtblk_setup_discard_write_zeroes(struct request *req, bool unmap)
>>   	return 0;
>>   }
>>   
>> -static inline void virtblk_request_done(struct request *req)
>> +static void virtblk_unmap_data(struct request *req, struct virtblk_req *vbr)
>>   {
>> -	struct virtblk_req *vbr = blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(req);
>> +	if (blk_rq_nr_phys_segments(req))
>> +		sg_free_table_chained(&vbr->sg_table,
>> +				      VIRTIO_BLK_INLINE_SG_CNT);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int virtblk_map_data(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, struct request *req,
>> +		struct virtblk_req *vbr)
>> +{
>> +	int err;
>> +
>> +	if (!blk_rq_nr_phys_segments(req))
>> +		return 0;
>> +
>> +	vbr->sg_table.sgl = vbr->sg;
>> +	err = sg_alloc_table_chained(&vbr->sg_table,
>> +				     blk_rq_nr_phys_segments(req),
>> +				     vbr->sg_table.sgl,
>> +				     VIRTIO_BLK_INLINE_SG_CNT);
>> +	if (unlikely(err))
>> +		return -ENOMEM;
>>   
>> +	return blk_rq_map_sg(hctx->queue, req, vbr->sg_table.sgl);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void virtblk_cleanup_cmd(struct request *req)
>> +{
>>   	if (req->rq_flags & RQF_SPECIAL_PAYLOAD) {
>>   		kfree(page_address(req->special_vec.bv_page) +
>>   		      req->special_vec.bv_offset);
>>   	}
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int virtblk_setup_cmd(struct virtio_device *vdev, struct request *req,
>> +		struct virtblk_req *vbr)
>> +{
>> +	bool unmap = false;
>> +	u32 type;
>> +
>> +	vbr->out_hdr.sector = 0;
>> +
>> +	switch (req_op(req)) {
>> +	case REQ_OP_READ:
>> +		type = VIRTIO_BLK_T_IN;
>> +		vbr->out_hdr.sector = cpu_to_virtio64(vdev,
>> +						      blk_rq_pos(req));
>> +		break;
>> +	case REQ_OP_WRITE:
>> +		type = VIRTIO_BLK_T_OUT;
>> +		vbr->out_hdr.sector = cpu_to_virtio64(vdev,
>> +						      blk_rq_pos(req));
>> +		break;
>> +	case REQ_OP_FLUSH:
>> +		type = VIRTIO_BLK_T_FLUSH;
>> +		break;
>> +	case REQ_OP_DISCARD:
>> +		type = VIRTIO_BLK_T_DISCARD;
>> +		break;
>> +	case REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES:
>> +		type = VIRTIO_BLK_T_WRITE_ZEROES;
>> +		unmap = !(req->cmd_flags & REQ_NOUNMAP);
>> +		break;
>> +	case REQ_OP_DRV_IN:
>> +		type = VIRTIO_BLK_T_GET_ID;
>> +		break;
>> +	default:
>> +		WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
>> +		return BLK_STS_IOERR;
>> +	}
>>   
>> +	vbr->out_hdr.type = cpu_to_virtio32(vdev, type);
>> +	vbr->out_hdr.ioprio = cpu_to_virtio32(vdev, req_get_ioprio(req));
>> +
>> +	if (type == VIRTIO_BLK_T_DISCARD || type == VIRTIO_BLK_T_WRITE_ZEROES) {
>> +		if (virtblk_setup_discard_write_zeroes(req, unmap))
>> +			return BLK_STS_RESOURCE;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline void virtblk_request_done(struct request *req)
>> +{
>> +	struct virtblk_req *vbr = blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(req);
>> +
>> +	virtblk_unmap_data(req, vbr);
>> +	virtblk_cleanup_cmd(req);
>>   	blk_mq_end_request(req, virtblk_result(vbr));
>>   }
>>   
>> @@ -244,57 +330,23 @@ static blk_status_t virtio_queue_rq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
>>   	int qid = hctx->queue_num;
>>   	int err;
>>   	bool notify = false;
>> -	bool unmap = false;
>> -	u32 type;
>>   
>>   	BUG_ON(req->nr_phys_segments + 2 > vblk->sg_elems);
>>   
>> -	switch (req_op(req)) {
>> -	case REQ_OP_READ:
>> -	case REQ_OP_WRITE:
>> -		type = 0;
>> -		break;
>> -	case REQ_OP_FLUSH:
>> -		type = VIRTIO_BLK_T_FLUSH;
>> -		break;
>> -	case REQ_OP_DISCARD:
>> -		type = VIRTIO_BLK_T_DISCARD;
>> -		break;
>> -	case REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES:
>> -		type = VIRTIO_BLK_T_WRITE_ZEROES;
>> -		unmap = !(req->cmd_flags & REQ_NOUNMAP);
>> -		break;
>> -	case REQ_OP_DRV_IN:
>> -		type = VIRTIO_BLK_T_GET_ID;
>> -		break;
>> -	default:
>> -		WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
>> -		return BLK_STS_IOERR;
>> -	}
>> -
>> -	vbr->out_hdr.type = cpu_to_virtio32(vblk->vdev, type);
>> -	vbr->out_hdr.sector = type ?
>> -		0 : cpu_to_virtio64(vblk->vdev, blk_rq_pos(req));
>> -	vbr->out_hdr.ioprio = cpu_to_virtio32(vblk->vdev, req_get_ioprio(req));
>> +	err = virtblk_setup_cmd(vblk->vdev, req, vbr);
>> +	if (unlikely(err))
>> +		return err;
>>   
>>   	blk_mq_start_request(req);
>>   
>> -	if (type == VIRTIO_BLK_T_DISCARD || type == VIRTIO_BLK_T_WRITE_ZEROES) {
>> -		err = virtblk_setup_discard_write_zeroes(req, unmap);
>> -		if (err)
>> -			return BLK_STS_RESOURCE;
>> -	}
>> -
>> -	num = blk_rq_map_sg(hctx->queue, req, vbr->sg);
>> -	if (num) {
>> -		if (rq_data_dir(req) == WRITE)
>> -			vbr->out_hdr.type |= cpu_to_virtio32(vblk->vdev, VIRTIO_BLK_T_OUT);
>> -		else
>> -			vbr->out_hdr.type |= cpu_to_virtio32(vblk->vdev, VIRTIO_BLK_T_IN);
>> +	num = virtblk_map_data(hctx, req, vbr);
>> +	if (unlikely(num < 0)) {
>> +		virtblk_cleanup_cmd(req);
>> +		return BLK_STS_RESOURCE;
>>   	}
>>   
>>   	spin_lock_irqsave(&vblk->vqs[qid].lock, flags);
>> -	err = virtblk_add_req(vblk->vqs[qid].vq, vbr, vbr->sg, num);
>> +	err = virtblk_add_req(vblk->vqs[qid].vq, vbr, vbr->sg_table.sgl, num);
>>   	if (err) {
>>   		virtqueue_kick(vblk->vqs[qid].vq);
>>   		/* Don't stop the queue if -ENOMEM: we may have failed to
>> @@ -303,6 +355,8 @@ static blk_status_t virtio_queue_rq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
>>   		if (err == -ENOSPC)
>>   			blk_mq_stop_hw_queue(hctx);
>>   		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vblk->vqs[qid].lock, flags);
>> +		virtblk_unmap_data(req, vbr);
>> +		virtblk_cleanup_cmd(req);
>>   		switch (err) {
>>   		case -ENOSPC:
>>   			return BLK_STS_DEV_RESOURCE;
>> @@ -681,16 +735,6 @@ static const struct attribute_group *virtblk_attr_groups[] = {
>>   	NULL,
>>   };
>>   
>> -static int virtblk_init_request(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set, struct request *rq,
>> -		unsigned int hctx_idx, unsigned int numa_node)
>> -{
>> -	struct virtio_blk *vblk = set->driver_data;
>> -	struct virtblk_req *vbr = blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(rq);
>> -
>> -	sg_init_table(vbr->sg, vblk->sg_elems);
>> -	return 0;
>> -}
>> -
>>   static int virtblk_map_queues(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set)
>>   {
>>   	struct virtio_blk *vblk = set->driver_data;
>> @@ -703,7 +747,6 @@ static const struct blk_mq_ops virtio_mq_ops = {
>>   	.queue_rq	= virtio_queue_rq,
>>   	.commit_rqs	= virtio_commit_rqs,
>>   	.complete	= virtblk_request_done,
>> -	.init_request	= virtblk_init_request,
>>   	.map_queues	= virtblk_map_queues,
>>   };
>>   
>> @@ -783,7 +826,7 @@ static int virtblk_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
>>   	vblk->tag_set.flags = BLK_MQ_F_SHOULD_MERGE;
>>   	vblk->tag_set.cmd_size =
>>   		sizeof(struct virtblk_req) +
>> -		sizeof(struct scatterlist) * sg_elems;
>> +		sizeof(struct scatterlist) * VIRTIO_BLK_INLINE_SG_CNT;
>>   	vblk->tag_set.driver_data = vblk;
>>   	vblk->tag_set.nr_hw_queues = vblk->num_vqs;
>>   
>> -- 
>> 2.18.1

Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] virtio-blk: avoid preallocating big SGL for data

[Jens Axboe]

On 9/1/21 8:58 AM, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
> 
> On 9/1/2021 5:50 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 04:14:34PM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
>>> No need to pre-allocate a big buffer for the IO SGL anymore. If a device
>>> has lots of deep queues, preallocation for the sg list can consume
>>> substantial amounts of memory. For HW virtio-blk device, nr_hw_queues
>>> can be 64 or 128 and each queue's depth might be 128. This means the
>>> resulting preallocation for the data SGLs is big.
>>>
>>> Switch to runtime allocation for SGL for lists longer than 2 entries.
>>> This is the approach used by NVMe drivers so it should be reasonable for
>>> virtio block as well. Runtime SGL allocation has always been the case
>>> for the legacy I/O path so this is nothing new.
>>>
>>> The preallocated small SGL depends on SG_CHAIN so if the ARCH doesn't
>>> support SG_CHAIN, use only runtime allocation for the SGL.
>>>
>>> Re-organize the setup of the IO request to fit the new sg chain
>>> mechanism.
>>>
>>> No performance degradation was seen (fio libaio engine with 16 jobs and
>>> 128 iodepth):
>>>
>>> IO size      IOPs Rand Read (before/after)         IOPs Rand Write (before/after)
>>> --------     ---------------------------------    ----------------------------------
>>> 512B          318K/316K                                    329K/325K
>>>
>>> 4KB           323K/321K                                    353K/349K
>>>
>>> 16KB          199K/208K                                    250K/275K
>>>
>>> 128KB         36K/36.1K                                    39.2K/41.7K
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Israel Rukshin <israelr@nvidia.com>
>> Could you use something to give confidence intervals maybe?
>> As it is it looks like a 1-2% regression for 512B and 4KB.
> 
> 1%-2% is not a regression. It's a device/env/test variance.
> 
> This is just one test results. I run it many times and got difference by 
> +/- 2%-3% in each run for each sides.
> 
> Even if I run same driver without changes I get 2%-3% difference between 
> runs.
> 
> If you have a perf test suite for virtio-blk it will be great if you can 
> run it, or maybe Feng Li has.

You're adding an allocation to the hot path, and a free to the
completion hot path. It's not unreasonable to expect that there could be
performance implications associated with that. Which would be
particularly evident with 1 segment requests, as the results would seem
to indicate as well.

Probably needs better testing. A profile of a peak run before and after
and a diff of the two might also be interesting.

The common idiom for situations like this is to have an inline part that
holds 1-2 segments, and then only punt to alloc if you need more than
that. As the number of segments grows, the cost per request matters
less.

-- 
Jens Axboe

Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] virtio-blk: avoid preallocating big SGL for data

[Max Gurtovoy]

On 9/1/2021 6:27 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 9/1/21 8:58 AM, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
>> On 9/1/2021 5:50 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 04:14:34PM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
>>>> No need to pre-allocate a big buffer for the IO SGL anymore. If a device
>>>> has lots of deep queues, preallocation for the sg list can consume
>>>> substantial amounts of memory. For HW virtio-blk device, nr_hw_queues
>>>> can be 64 or 128 and each queue's depth might be 128. This means the
>>>> resulting preallocation for the data SGLs is big.
>>>>
>>>> Switch to runtime allocation for SGL for lists longer than 2 entries.
>>>> This is the approach used by NVMe drivers so it should be reasonable for
>>>> virtio block as well. Runtime SGL allocation has always been the case
>>>> for the legacy I/O path so this is nothing new.
>>>>
>>>> The preallocated small SGL depends on SG_CHAIN so if the ARCH doesn't
>>>> support SG_CHAIN, use only runtime allocation for the SGL.
>>>>
>>>> Re-organize the setup of the IO request to fit the new sg chain
>>>> mechanism.
>>>>
>>>> No performance degradation was seen (fio libaio engine with 16 jobs and
>>>> 128 iodepth):
>>>>
>>>> IO size      IOPs Rand Read (before/after)         IOPs Rand Write (before/after)
>>>> --------     ---------------------------------    ----------------------------------
>>>> 512B          318K/316K                                    329K/325K
>>>>
>>>> 4KB           323K/321K                                    353K/349K
>>>>
>>>> 16KB          199K/208K                                    250K/275K
>>>>
>>>> 128KB         36K/36.1K                                    39.2K/41.7K
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Israel Rukshin <israelr@nvidia.com>
>>> Could you use something to give confidence intervals maybe?
>>> As it is it looks like a 1-2% regression for 512B and 4KB.
>> 1%-2% is not a regression. It's a device/env/test variance.
>>
>> This is just one test results. I run it many times and got difference by
>> +/- 2%-3% in each run for each sides.
>>
>> Even if I run same driver without changes I get 2%-3% difference between
>> runs.
>>
>> If you have a perf test suite for virtio-blk it will be great if you can
>> run it, or maybe Feng Li has.
> You're adding an allocation to the hot path, and a free to the
> completion hot path. It's not unreasonable to expect that there could be
> performance implications associated with that. Which would be
> particularly evident with 1 segment requests, as the results would seem
> to indicate as well.

but for sg_nents <= 2 there is no dynamic allocation also in this patch 
exactly as we do in nvmf RDMA and FC for example.


>
> Probably needs better testing. A profile of a peak run before and after
> and a diff of the two might also be interesting.

I'll run ezfio test suite with stronger virtio-blk device that reach > 
800KIOPs


>
> The common idiom for situations like this is to have an inline part that
> holds 1-2 segments, and then only punt to alloc if you need more than
> that. As the number of segments grows, the cost per request matters
> less.

isn't this the case here ? or am I missing something ?

Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] virtio-blk: avoid preallocating big SGL for data

[Jens Axboe]

On 9/1/21 4:25 PM, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
> 
> On 9/1/2021 6:27 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 9/1/21 8:58 AM, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
>>> On 9/1/2021 5:50 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 04:14:34PM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
>>>>> No need to pre-allocate a big buffer for the IO SGL anymore. If a device
>>>>> has lots of deep queues, preallocation for the sg list can consume
>>>>> substantial amounts of memory. For HW virtio-blk device, nr_hw_queues
>>>>> can be 64 or 128 and each queue's depth might be 128. This means the
>>>>> resulting preallocation for the data SGLs is big.
>>>>>
>>>>> Switch to runtime allocation for SGL for lists longer than 2 entries.
>>>>> This is the approach used by NVMe drivers so it should be reasonable for
>>>>> virtio block as well. Runtime SGL allocation has always been the case
>>>>> for the legacy I/O path so this is nothing new.
>>>>>
>>>>> The preallocated small SGL depends on SG_CHAIN so if the ARCH doesn't
>>>>> support SG_CHAIN, use only runtime allocation for the SGL.
>>>>>
>>>>> Re-organize the setup of the IO request to fit the new sg chain
>>>>> mechanism.
>>>>>
>>>>> No performance degradation was seen (fio libaio engine with 16 jobs and
>>>>> 128 iodepth):
>>>>>
>>>>> IO size      IOPs Rand Read (before/after)         IOPs Rand Write (before/after)
>>>>> --------     ---------------------------------    ----------------------------------
>>>>> 512B          318K/316K                                    329K/325K
>>>>>
>>>>> 4KB           323K/321K                                    353K/349K
>>>>>
>>>>> 16KB          199K/208K                                    250K/275K
>>>>>
>>>>> 128KB         36K/36.1K                                    39.2K/41.7K
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com>
>>>>> Reviewed-by: Israel Rukshin <israelr@nvidia.com>
>>>> Could you use something to give confidence intervals maybe?
>>>> As it is it looks like a 1-2% regression for 512B and 4KB.
>>> 1%-2% is not a regression. It's a device/env/test variance.
>>>
>>> This is just one test results. I run it many times and got difference by
>>> +/- 2%-3% in each run for each sides.
>>>
>>> Even if I run same driver without changes I get 2%-3% difference between
>>> runs.
>>>
>>> If you have a perf test suite for virtio-blk it will be great if you can
>>> run it, or maybe Feng Li has.
>> You're adding an allocation to the hot path, and a free to the
>> completion hot path. It's not unreasonable to expect that there could be
>> performance implications associated with that. Which would be
>> particularly evident with 1 segment requests, as the results would seem
>> to indicate as well.
> 
> but for sg_nents <= 2 there is no dynamic allocation also in this patch 
> exactly as we do in nvmf RDMA and FC for example.

My quick read missed that, which is why you're using chaining. Then it
looks very reasonable to me.

>> Probably needs better testing. A profile of a peak run before and after
>> and a diff of the two might also be interesting.
> 
> I'll run ezfio test suite with stronger virtio-blk device that reach > 
> 800KIOPs

That'd be better, and preferably a test with pinning etc so that you can
show more consistent results. Just reading your table does indeed look
like there's a performance degradation, even if you preface it by saying
there is none. It would need better explaining, but preferably better
testing.

>> The common idiom for situations like this is to have an inline part that
>> holds 1-2 segments, and then only punt to alloc if you need more than
>> that. As the number of segments grows, the cost per request matters
>> less.
> 
> isn't this the case here ? or am I missing something ?

it totally is, I was the one missing that.

-- 
Jens Axboe

Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] virtio-blk: avoid preallocating big SGL for data

[Stefan Hajnoczi]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2254 bytes --]

On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 04:14:34PM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
> No need to pre-allocate a big buffer for the IO SGL anymore. If a device
> has lots of deep queues, preallocation for the sg list can consume
> substantial amounts of memory. For HW virtio-blk device, nr_hw_queues
> can be 64 or 128 and each queue's depth might be 128. This means the
> resulting preallocation for the data SGLs is big.
> 
> Switch to runtime allocation for SGL for lists longer than 2 entries.
> This is the approach used by NVMe drivers so it should be reasonable for
> virtio block as well. Runtime SGL allocation has always been the case
> for the legacy I/O path so this is nothing new.
> 
> The preallocated small SGL depends on SG_CHAIN so if the ARCH doesn't
> support SG_CHAIN, use only runtime allocation for the SGL.
> 
> Re-organize the setup of the IO request to fit the new sg chain
> mechanism.
> 
> No performance degradation was seen (fio libaio engine with 16 jobs and
> 128 iodepth):
> 
> IO size      IOPs Rand Read (before/after)         IOPs Rand Write (before/after)
> --------     ---------------------------------    ----------------------------------
> 512B          318K/316K                                    329K/325K
> 
> 4KB           323K/321K                                    353K/349K
> 
> 16KB          199K/208K                                    250K/275K
> 
> 128KB         36K/36.1K                                    39.2K/41.7K
> 
> Signed-off-by: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Israel Rukshin <israelr@nvidia.com>
> ---
> 
> changes from V2:
>  - initialize vbr->out_hdr.sector during virtblk_setup_cmd
> 
> changes from V1:
>  - Kconfig update (from Christoph)
>  - Re-order cmd setup (from Christoph)
>  - use flexible sg pointer in the cmd (from Christoph)
>  - added perf numbers to commit msg (from Feng Li)
> 
> ---
>  drivers/block/Kconfig      |   1 +
>  drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 155 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>  2 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)

Hi Max,
I can run benchmark to give everyone more confidence about this change.
Should I test this version or are you still planning to make code
changes?

Stefan

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] virtio-blk: avoid preallocating big SGL for data

[Max Gurtovoy]

On 9/2/2021 3:21 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 04:14:34PM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
>> No need to pre-allocate a big buffer for the IO SGL anymore. If a device
>> has lots of deep queues, preallocation for the sg list can consume
>> substantial amounts of memory. For HW virtio-blk device, nr_hw_queues
>> can be 64 or 128 and each queue's depth might be 128. This means the
>> resulting preallocation for the data SGLs is big.
>>
>> Switch to runtime allocation for SGL for lists longer than 2 entries.
>> This is the approach used by NVMe drivers so it should be reasonable for
>> virtio block as well. Runtime SGL allocation has always been the case
>> for the legacy I/O path so this is nothing new.
>>
>> The preallocated small SGL depends on SG_CHAIN so if the ARCH doesn't
>> support SG_CHAIN, use only runtime allocation for the SGL.
>>
>> Re-organize the setup of the IO request to fit the new sg chain
>> mechanism.
>>
>> No performance degradation was seen (fio libaio engine with 16 jobs and
>> 128 iodepth):
>>
>> IO size      IOPs Rand Read (before/after)         IOPs Rand Write (before/after)
>> --------     ---------------------------------    ----------------------------------
>> 512B          318K/316K                                    329K/325K
>>
>> 4KB           323K/321K                                    353K/349K
>>
>> 16KB          199K/208K                                    250K/275K
>>
>> 128KB         36K/36.1K                                    39.2K/41.7K
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Israel Rukshin <israelr@nvidia.com>
>> ---
>>
>> changes from V2:
>>   - initialize vbr->out_hdr.sector during virtblk_setup_cmd
>>
>> changes from V1:
>>   - Kconfig update (from Christoph)
>>   - Re-order cmd setup (from Christoph)
>>   - use flexible sg pointer in the cmd (from Christoph)
>>   - added perf numbers to commit msg (from Feng Li)
>>
>> ---
>>   drivers/block/Kconfig      |   1 +
>>   drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 155 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>>   2 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)
> Hi Max,
> I can run benchmark to give everyone more confidence about this change.
> Should I test this version or are you still planning to make code
> changes?

Yes you can test v3.

Thanks,

Max.

>
> Stefan

Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] virtio-blk: avoid preallocating big SGL for data

[Stefan Hajnoczi]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2325 bytes --]

On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 04:14:34PM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
> No need to pre-allocate a big buffer for the IO SGL anymore. If a device
> has lots of deep queues, preallocation for the sg list can consume
> substantial amounts of memory. For HW virtio-blk device, nr_hw_queues
> can be 64 or 128 and each queue's depth might be 128. This means the
> resulting preallocation for the data SGLs is big.
> 
> Switch to runtime allocation for SGL for lists longer than 2 entries.
> This is the approach used by NVMe drivers so it should be reasonable for
> virtio block as well. Runtime SGL allocation has always been the case
> for the legacy I/O path so this is nothing new.
> 
> The preallocated small SGL depends on SG_CHAIN so if the ARCH doesn't
> support SG_CHAIN, use only runtime allocation for the SGL.
> 
> Re-organize the setup of the IO request to fit the new sg chain
> mechanism.
> 
> No performance degradation was seen (fio libaio engine with 16 jobs and
> 128 iodepth):
> 
> IO size      IOPs Rand Read (before/after)         IOPs Rand Write (before/after)
> --------     ---------------------------------    ----------------------------------
> 512B          318K/316K                                    329K/325K
> 
> 4KB           323K/321K                                    353K/349K
> 
> 16KB          199K/208K                                    250K/275K
> 
> 128KB         36K/36.1K                                    39.2K/41.7K

I ran fio randread benchmarks with 4k, 16k, 64k, and 128k at iodepth 1,
8, and 64 on two vCPUs. The results look fine, there is no significant
regression.

iodepth=1 and iodepth=64 are very consistent. For some reason the
iodepth=8 has significant variance but I don't think it's the fault of
this patch.

Fio results and the Jupyter notebook export are available here (check
out benchmark.html to see the graphs):

https://gitlab.com/stefanha/virt-playbooks/-/tree/virtio-blk-sgl-allocation-benchmark/notebook

Guest:
- Fedora 34
- Linux v5.14
- 2 vCPUs (pinned), 4 GB RAM (single host NUMA node)
- 1 IOThread (pinned)
- virtio-blk aio=native,cache=none,format=raw
- QEMU 6.1.0

Host:
- RHEL 8.3
- Linux 4.18.0-240.22.1.el8_3.x86_64
- Intel(R) Xeon(R) Silver 4214 CPU @ 2.20GHz
- Intel Optane DC P4800X

Stefan

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] virtio-blk: avoid preallocating big SGL for data

[Feng Li]

On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 11:39 PM Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 04:14:34PM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
> > No need to pre-allocate a big buffer for the IO SGL anymore. If a device
> > has lots of deep queues, preallocation for the sg list can consume
> > substantial amounts of memory. For HW virtio-blk device, nr_hw_queues
> > can be 64 or 128 and each queue's depth might be 128. This means the
> > resulting preallocation for the data SGLs is big.
> >
> > Switch to runtime allocation for SGL for lists longer than 2 entries.
> > This is the approach used by NVMe drivers so it should be reasonable for
> > virtio block as well. Runtime SGL allocation has always been the case
> > for the legacy I/O path so this is nothing new.
> >
> > The preallocated small SGL depends on SG_CHAIN so if the ARCH doesn't
> > support SG_CHAIN, use only runtime allocation for the SGL.
> >
> > Re-organize the setup of the IO request to fit the new sg chain
> > mechanism.
> >
> > No performance degradation was seen (fio libaio engine with 16 jobs and
> > 128 iodepth):
> >
> > IO size      IOPs Rand Read (before/after)         IOPs Rand Write (before/after)
> > --------     ---------------------------------    ----------------------------------
> > 512B          318K/316K                                    329K/325K
> >
> > 4KB           323K/321K                                    353K/349K
> >
> > 16KB          199K/208K                                    250K/275K
> >
> > 128KB         36K/36.1K                                    39.2K/41.7K
>
> I ran fio randread benchmarks with 4k, 16k, 64k, and 128k at iodepth 1,
> 8, and 64 on two vCPUs. The results look fine, there is no significant
> regression.
>
> iodepth=1 and iodepth=64 are very consistent. For some reason the
> iodepth=8 has significant variance but I don't think it's the fault of
> this patch.
>
> Fio results and the Jupyter notebook export are available here (check
> out benchmark.html to see the graphs):
>
> https://gitlab.com/stefanha/virt-playbooks/-/tree/virtio-blk-sgl-allocation-benchmark/notebook
>
> Guest:
> - Fedora 34
> - Linux v5.14
> - 2 vCPUs (pinned), 4 GB RAM (single host NUMA node)
> - 1 IOThread (pinned)
> - virtio-blk aio=native,cache=none,format=raw
> - QEMU 6.1.0
>
> Host:
> - RHEL 8.3
> - Linux 4.18.0-240.22.1.el8_3.x86_64
> - Intel(R) Xeon(R) Silver 4214 CPU @ 2.20GHz
> - Intel Optane DC P4800X
>
> Stefan

Reviewed-by: Feng Li <lifeng1519@gmail.com>

Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] virtio-blk: avoid preallocating big SGL for data

[Max Gurtovoy]

On 9/6/2021 6:09 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 04:14:34PM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
>> No need to pre-allocate a big buffer for the IO SGL anymore. If a device
>> has lots of deep queues, preallocation for the sg list can consume
>> substantial amounts of memory. For HW virtio-blk device, nr_hw_queues
>> can be 64 or 128 and each queue's depth might be 128. This means the
>> resulting preallocation for the data SGLs is big.
>>
>> Switch to runtime allocation for SGL for lists longer than 2 entries.
>> This is the approach used by NVMe drivers so it should be reasonable for
>> virtio block as well. Runtime SGL allocation has always been the case
>> for the legacy I/O path so this is nothing new.
>>
>> The preallocated small SGL depends on SG_CHAIN so if the ARCH doesn't
>> support SG_CHAIN, use only runtime allocation for the SGL.
>>
>> Re-organize the setup of the IO request to fit the new sg chain
>> mechanism.
>>
>> No performance degradation was seen (fio libaio engine with 16 jobs and
>> 128 iodepth):
>>
>> IO size      IOPs Rand Read (before/after)         IOPs Rand Write (before/after)
>> --------     ---------------------------------    ----------------------------------
>> 512B          318K/316K                                    329K/325K
>>
>> 4KB           323K/321K                                    353K/349K
>>
>> 16KB          199K/208K                                    250K/275K
>>
>> 128KB         36K/36.1K                                    39.2K/41.7K
> I ran fio randread benchmarks with 4k, 16k, 64k, and 128k at iodepth 1,
> 8, and 64 on two vCPUs. The results look fine, there is no significant
> regression.
>
> iodepth=1 and iodepth=64 are very consistent. For some reason the
> iodepth=8 has significant variance but I don't think it's the fault of
> this patch.
>
> Fio results and the Jupyter notebook export are available here (check
> out benchmark.html to see the graphs):
>
> https://gitlab.com/stefanha/virt-playbooks/-/tree/virtio-blk-sgl-allocation-benchmark/notebook
>
> Guest:
> - Fedora 34
> - Linux v5.14
> - 2 vCPUs (pinned), 4 GB RAM (single host NUMA node)
> - 1 IOThread (pinned)
> - virtio-blk aio=native,cache=none,format=raw
> - QEMU 6.1.0
>
> Host:
> - RHEL 8.3
> - Linux 4.18.0-240.22.1.el8_3.x86_64
> - Intel(R) Xeon(R) Silver 4214 CPU @ 2.20GHz
> - Intel Optane DC P4800X
>
> Stefan

Thanks, Stefan.

Would you like me to add some of the results in my commit msg ? or 
Tested-By sign ?

Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] virtio-blk: avoid preallocating big SGL for data

[Stefan Hajnoczi]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2951 bytes --]

On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 05:50:21PM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
> 
> On 9/6/2021 6:09 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 04:14:34PM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
> > > No need to pre-allocate a big buffer for the IO SGL anymore. If a device
> > > has lots of deep queues, preallocation for the sg list can consume
> > > substantial amounts of memory. For HW virtio-blk device, nr_hw_queues
> > > can be 64 or 128 and each queue's depth might be 128. This means the
> > > resulting preallocation for the data SGLs is big.
> > > 
> > > Switch to runtime allocation for SGL for lists longer than 2 entries.
> > > This is the approach used by NVMe drivers so it should be reasonable for
> > > virtio block as well. Runtime SGL allocation has always been the case
> > > for the legacy I/O path so this is nothing new.
> > > 
> > > The preallocated small SGL depends on SG_CHAIN so if the ARCH doesn't
> > > support SG_CHAIN, use only runtime allocation for the SGL.
> > > 
> > > Re-organize the setup of the IO request to fit the new sg chain
> > > mechanism.
> > > 
> > > No performance degradation was seen (fio libaio engine with 16 jobs and
> > > 128 iodepth):
> > > 
> > > IO size      IOPs Rand Read (before/after)         IOPs Rand Write (before/after)
> > > --------     ---------------------------------    ----------------------------------
> > > 512B          318K/316K                                    329K/325K
> > > 
> > > 4KB           323K/321K                                    353K/349K
> > > 
> > > 16KB          199K/208K                                    250K/275K
> > > 
> > > 128KB         36K/36.1K                                    39.2K/41.7K
> > I ran fio randread benchmarks with 4k, 16k, 64k, and 128k at iodepth 1,
> > 8, and 64 on two vCPUs. The results look fine, there is no significant
> > regression.
> > 
> > iodepth=1 and iodepth=64 are very consistent. For some reason the
> > iodepth=8 has significant variance but I don't think it's the fault of
> > this patch.
> > 
> > Fio results and the Jupyter notebook export are available here (check
> > out benchmark.html to see the graphs):
> > 
> > https://gitlab.com/stefanha/virt-playbooks/-/tree/virtio-blk-sgl-allocation-benchmark/notebook
> > 
> > Guest:
> > - Fedora 34
> > - Linux v5.14
> > - 2 vCPUs (pinned), 4 GB RAM (single host NUMA node)
> > - 1 IOThread (pinned)
> > - virtio-blk aio=native,cache=none,format=raw
> > - QEMU 6.1.0
> > 
> > Host:
> > - RHEL 8.3
> > - Linux 4.18.0-240.22.1.el8_3.x86_64
> > - Intel(R) Xeon(R) Silver 4214 CPU @ 2.20GHz
> > - Intel Optane DC P4800X
> > 
> > Stefan
> 
> Thanks, Stefan.
> 
> Would you like me to add some of the results in my commit msg ? or Tested-By
> sign ?

Thanks, there's no need to change the commit description.

Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] virtio-blk: avoid preallocating big SGL for data

[Max Gurtovoy]

Hi MST/Jens,

Do we need more review here or are we ok with the code and the test matrix ?

If we're ok, we need to decide if this goes through virtio PR or block PR.

Cheers,

-Max.

On 9/14/2021 3:22 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 05:50:21PM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
>> On 9/6/2021 6:09 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 04:14:34PM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
>>>> No need to pre-allocate a big buffer for the IO SGL anymore. If a device
>>>> has lots of deep queues, preallocation for the sg list can consume
>>>> substantial amounts of memory. For HW virtio-blk device, nr_hw_queues
>>>> can be 64 or 128 and each queue's depth might be 128. This means the
>>>> resulting preallocation for the data SGLs is big.
>>>>
>>>> Switch to runtime allocation for SGL for lists longer than 2 entries.
>>>> This is the approach used by NVMe drivers so it should be reasonable for
>>>> virtio block as well. Runtime SGL allocation has always been the case
>>>> for the legacy I/O path so this is nothing new.
>>>>
>>>> The preallocated small SGL depends on SG_CHAIN so if the ARCH doesn't
>>>> support SG_CHAIN, use only runtime allocation for the SGL.
>>>>
>>>> Re-organize the setup of the IO request to fit the new sg chain
>>>> mechanism.
>>>>
>>>> No performance degradation was seen (fio libaio engine with 16 jobs and
>>>> 128 iodepth):
>>>>
>>>> IO size      IOPs Rand Read (before/after)         IOPs Rand Write (before/after)
>>>> --------     ---------------------------------    ----------------------------------
>>>> 512B          318K/316K                                    329K/325K
>>>>
>>>> 4KB           323K/321K                                    353K/349K
>>>>
>>>> 16KB          199K/208K                                    250K/275K
>>>>
>>>> 128KB         36K/36.1K                                    39.2K/41.7K
>>> I ran fio randread benchmarks with 4k, 16k, 64k, and 128k at iodepth 1,
>>> 8, and 64 on two vCPUs. The results look fine, there is no significant
>>> regression.
>>>
>>> iodepth=1 and iodepth=64 are very consistent. For some reason the
>>> iodepth=8 has significant variance but I don't think it's the fault of
>>> this patch.
>>>
>>> Fio results and the Jupyter notebook export are available here (check
>>> out benchmark.html to see the graphs):
>>>
>>> https://gitlab.com/stefanha/virt-playbooks/-/tree/virtio-blk-sgl-allocation-benchmark/notebook
>>>
>>> Guest:
>>> - Fedora 34
>>> - Linux v5.14
>>> - 2 vCPUs (pinned), 4 GB RAM (single host NUMA node)
>>> - 1 IOThread (pinned)
>>> - virtio-blk aio=native,cache=none,format=raw
>>> - QEMU 6.1.0
>>>
>>> Host:
>>> - RHEL 8.3
>>> - Linux 4.18.0-240.22.1.el8_3.x86_64
>>> - Intel(R) Xeon(R) Silver 4214 CPU @ 2.20GHz
>>> - Intel Optane DC P4800X
>>>
>>> Stefan
>> Thanks, Stefan.
>>
>> Would you like me to add some of the results in my commit msg ? or Tested-By
>> sign ?
> Thanks, there's no need to change the commit description.
>
> Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
> Tested-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>

Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] virtio-blk: avoid preallocating big SGL for data

[Michael S. Tsirkin]

OK by me.
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

I will queue it for the next kernel.
Thanks!


On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 04:40:56PM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
> Hi MST/Jens,
> 
> Do we need more review here or are we ok with the code and the test matrix ?
> 
> If we're ok, we need to decide if this goes through virtio PR or block PR.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> -Max.
> 
> On 9/14/2021 3:22 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 05:50:21PM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
> > > On 9/6/2021 6:09 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 04:14:34PM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
> > > > > No need to pre-allocate a big buffer for the IO SGL anymore. If a device
> > > > > has lots of deep queues, preallocation for the sg list can consume
> > > > > substantial amounts of memory. For HW virtio-blk device, nr_hw_queues
> > > > > can be 64 or 128 and each queue's depth might be 128. This means the
> > > > > resulting preallocation for the data SGLs is big.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Switch to runtime allocation for SGL for lists longer than 2 entries.
> > > > > This is the approach used by NVMe drivers so it should be reasonable for
> > > > > virtio block as well. Runtime SGL allocation has always been the case
> > > > > for the legacy I/O path so this is nothing new.
> > > > > 
> > > > > The preallocated small SGL depends on SG_CHAIN so if the ARCH doesn't
> > > > > support SG_CHAIN, use only runtime allocation for the SGL.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Re-organize the setup of the IO request to fit the new sg chain
> > > > > mechanism.
> > > > > 
> > > > > No performance degradation was seen (fio libaio engine with 16 jobs and
> > > > > 128 iodepth):
> > > > > 
> > > > > IO size      IOPs Rand Read (before/after)         IOPs Rand Write (before/after)
> > > > > --------     ---------------------------------    ----------------------------------
> > > > > 512B          318K/316K                                    329K/325K
> > > > > 
> > > > > 4KB           323K/321K                                    353K/349K
> > > > > 
> > > > > 16KB          199K/208K                                    250K/275K
> > > > > 
> > > > > 128KB         36K/36.1K                                    39.2K/41.7K
> > > > I ran fio randread benchmarks with 4k, 16k, 64k, and 128k at iodepth 1,
> > > > 8, and 64 on two vCPUs. The results look fine, there is no significant
> > > > regression.
> > > > 
> > > > iodepth=1 and iodepth=64 are very consistent. For some reason the
> > > > iodepth=8 has significant variance but I don't think it's the fault of
> > > > this patch.
> > > > 
> > > > Fio results and the Jupyter notebook export are available here (check
> > > > out benchmark.html to see the graphs):
> > > > 
> > > > https://gitlab.com/stefanha/virt-playbooks/-/tree/virtio-blk-sgl-allocation-benchmark/notebook
> > > > 
> > > > Guest:
> > > > - Fedora 34
> > > > - Linux v5.14
> > > > - 2 vCPUs (pinned), 4 GB RAM (single host NUMA node)
> > > > - 1 IOThread (pinned)
> > > > - virtio-blk aio=native,cache=none,format=raw
> > > > - QEMU 6.1.0
> > > > 
> > > > Host:
> > > > - RHEL 8.3
> > > > - Linux 4.18.0-240.22.1.el8_3.x86_64
> > > > - Intel(R) Xeon(R) Silver 4214 CPU @ 2.20GHz
> > > > - Intel Optane DC P4800X
> > > > 
> > > > Stefan
> > > Thanks, Stefan.
> > > 
> > > Would you like me to add some of the results in my commit msg ? or Tested-By
> > > sign ?
> > Thanks, there's no need to change the commit description.
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
> > Tested-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>

Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] virtio-blk: avoid preallocating big SGL for data

[Michael S. Tsirkin]

My tree is ok.
Looks like your patch was developed on top of some other tree,
not plan upstream linux, so git am fails. I applied it using
patch and some manual tweaking, and it seems to work for
me but please do test it in linux-next and confirm -
will push to a linux-next branch in my tree soon.

On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 04:40:56PM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
> Hi MST/Jens,
> 
> Do we need more review here or are we ok with the code and the test matrix ?
> 
> If we're ok, we need to decide if this goes through virtio PR or block PR.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> -Max.
> 
> On 9/14/2021 3:22 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 05:50:21PM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
> > > On 9/6/2021 6:09 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 04:14:34PM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
> > > > > No need to pre-allocate a big buffer for the IO SGL anymore. If a device
> > > > > has lots of deep queues, preallocation for the sg list can consume
> > > > > substantial amounts of memory. For HW virtio-blk device, nr_hw_queues
> > > > > can be 64 or 128 and each queue's depth might be 128. This means the
> > > > > resulting preallocation for the data SGLs is big.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Switch to runtime allocation for SGL for lists longer than 2 entries.
> > > > > This is the approach used by NVMe drivers so it should be reasonable for
> > > > > virtio block as well. Runtime SGL allocation has always been the case
> > > > > for the legacy I/O path so this is nothing new.
> > > > > 
> > > > > The preallocated small SGL depends on SG_CHAIN so if the ARCH doesn't
> > > > > support SG_CHAIN, use only runtime allocation for the SGL.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Re-organize the setup of the IO request to fit the new sg chain
> > > > > mechanism.
> > > > > 
> > > > > No performance degradation was seen (fio libaio engine with 16 jobs and
> > > > > 128 iodepth):
> > > > > 
> > > > > IO size      IOPs Rand Read (before/after)         IOPs Rand Write (before/after)
> > > > > --------     ---------------------------------    ----------------------------------
> > > > > 512B          318K/316K                                    329K/325K
> > > > > 
> > > > > 4KB           323K/321K                                    353K/349K
> > > > > 
> > > > > 16KB          199K/208K                                    250K/275K
> > > > > 
> > > > > 128KB         36K/36.1K                                    39.2K/41.7K
> > > > I ran fio randread benchmarks with 4k, 16k, 64k, and 128k at iodepth 1,
> > > > 8, and 64 on two vCPUs. The results look fine, there is no significant
> > > > regression.
> > > > 
> > > > iodepth=1 and iodepth=64 are very consistent. For some reason the
> > > > iodepth=8 has significant variance but I don't think it's the fault of
> > > > this patch.
> > > > 
> > > > Fio results and the Jupyter notebook export are available here (check
> > > > out benchmark.html to see the graphs):
> > > > 
> > > > https://gitlab.com/stefanha/virt-playbooks/-/tree/virtio-blk-sgl-allocation-benchmark/notebook
> > > > 
> > > > Guest:
> > > > - Fedora 34
> > > > - Linux v5.14
> > > > - 2 vCPUs (pinned), 4 GB RAM (single host NUMA node)
> > > > - 1 IOThread (pinned)
> > > > - virtio-blk aio=native,cache=none,format=raw
> > > > - QEMU 6.1.0
> > > > 
> > > > Host:
> > > > - RHEL 8.3
> > > > - Linux 4.18.0-240.22.1.el8_3.x86_64
> > > > - Intel(R) Xeon(R) Silver 4214 CPU @ 2.20GHz
> > > > - Intel Optane DC P4800X
> > > > 
> > > > Stefan
> > > Thanks, Stefan.
> > > 
> > > Would you like me to add some of the results in my commit msg ? or Tested-By
> > > sign ?
> > Thanks, there's no need to change the commit description.
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
> > Tested-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>

Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] virtio-blk: avoid preallocating big SGL for data

[Max Gurtovoy]

On 10/22/2021 12:15 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> My tree is ok.
> Looks like your patch was developed on top of some other tree,
> not plan upstream linux, so git am fails. I applied it using
> patch and some manual tweaking, and it seems to work for
> me but please do test it in linux-next and confirm -
> will push to a linux-next branch in my tree soon.

I've tested. looks fine.


>
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 04:40:56PM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
>> Hi MST/Jens,
>>
>> Do we need more review here or are we ok with the code and the test matrix ?
>>
>> If we're ok, we need to decide if this goes through virtio PR or block PR.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> -Max.
>>
>> On 9/14/2021 3:22 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>>> On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 05:50:21PM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
>>>> On 9/6/2021 6:09 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 04:14:34PM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
>>>>>> No need to pre-allocate a big buffer for the IO SGL anymore. If a device
>>>>>> has lots of deep queues, preallocation for the sg list can consume
>>>>>> substantial amounts of memory. For HW virtio-blk device, nr_hw_queues
>>>>>> can be 64 or 128 and each queue's depth might be 128. This means the
>>>>>> resulting preallocation for the data SGLs is big.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Switch to runtime allocation for SGL for lists longer than 2 entries.
>>>>>> This is the approach used by NVMe drivers so it should be reasonable for
>>>>>> virtio block as well. Runtime SGL allocation has always been the case
>>>>>> for the legacy I/O path so this is nothing new.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The preallocated small SGL depends on SG_CHAIN so if the ARCH doesn't
>>>>>> support SG_CHAIN, use only runtime allocation for the SGL.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Re-organize the setup of the IO request to fit the new sg chain
>>>>>> mechanism.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No performance degradation was seen (fio libaio engine with 16 jobs and
>>>>>> 128 iodepth):
>>>>>>
>>>>>> IO size      IOPs Rand Read (before/after)         IOPs Rand Write (before/after)
>>>>>> --------     ---------------------------------    ----------------------------------
>>>>>> 512B          318K/316K                                    329K/325K
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 4KB           323K/321K                                    353K/349K
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 16KB          199K/208K                                    250K/275K
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 128KB         36K/36.1K                                    39.2K/41.7K
>>>>> I ran fio randread benchmarks with 4k, 16k, 64k, and 128k at iodepth 1,
>>>>> 8, and 64 on two vCPUs. The results look fine, there is no significant
>>>>> regression.
>>>>>
>>>>> iodepth=1 and iodepth=64 are very consistent. For some reason the
>>>>> iodepth=8 has significant variance but I don't think it's the fault of
>>>>> this patch.
>>>>>
>>>>> Fio results and the Jupyter notebook export are available here (check
>>>>> out benchmark.html to see the graphs):
>>>>>
>>>>> https://gitlab.com/stefanha/virt-playbooks/-/tree/virtio-blk-sgl-allocation-benchmark/notebook
>>>>>
>>>>> Guest:
>>>>> - Fedora 34
>>>>> - Linux v5.14
>>>>> - 2 vCPUs (pinned), 4 GB RAM (single host NUMA node)
>>>>> - 1 IOThread (pinned)
>>>>> - virtio-blk aio=native,cache=none,format=raw
>>>>> - QEMU 6.1.0
>>>>>
>>>>> Host:
>>>>> - RHEL 8.3
>>>>> - Linux 4.18.0-240.22.1.el8_3.x86_64
>>>>> - Intel(R) Xeon(R) Silver 4214 CPU @ 2.20GHz
>>>>> - Intel Optane DC P4800X
>>>>>
>>>>> Stefan
>>>> Thanks, Stefan.
>>>>
>>>> Would you like me to add some of the results in my commit msg ? or Tested-By
>>>> sign ?
>>> Thanks, there's no need to change the commit description.
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
>>> Tested-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>

Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] virtio-blk: avoid preallocating big SGL for data

[Christoph Hellwig]

Looks good,

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>