From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Cc: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>, Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com>, raven@themaw.net, Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>, keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-block <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>, LSM List <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>, linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>, Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/21] pipe: Keyrings, Block and USB notifications Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 15:32:08 -0700 [thread overview] Message-ID: <CAHk-=whfCy+WCZ5SXZGi4QEhxXm=EjZjj4R9+o4q-QR3saMyfg@mail.gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <157117606853.15019.15459271147790470307.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Aside from the two small comments, the pipe side looked reasonable, but I stopped looking when the patches moved on to the notificaiton part, and maybe I missed something in the earlier ones too. Which does bring me to the meat of this email: can we please keep the pipe cleanups and prepwork (and benchmarking) as a separate patch series? I'd like that to be done separately from the notification code, since it's re-organization and cleanup - while the eventual goal is to be able to add messages to the pipe atomically, I think the series makes sense (and should make sense) on its own. Linus
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-15 22:32 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2019-10-15 21:47 David Howells 2019-10-15 21:47 ` [RFC PATCH 01/21] pipe: Reduce #inclusion of pipe_fs_i.h David Howells 2019-10-15 21:48 ` [RFC PATCH 02/21] Add a prelocked wake-up David Howells 2019-10-15 22:14 ` Linus Torvalds 2019-10-16 17:02 ` Tim Chen 2019-10-15 22:33 ` David Howells 2019-10-16 14:26 ` David Howells 2019-10-16 15:31 ` Linus Torvalds 2019-10-15 21:48 ` [RFC PATCH 03/21] pipe: Use head and tail pointers for the ring, not cursor and length David Howells 2019-10-16 7:46 ` Rasmus Villemoes 2019-10-17 10:53 ` David Howells 2019-10-15 21:48 ` [RFC PATCH 04/21] pipe: Advance tail pointer inside of wait spinlock in pipe_read() David Howells 2019-10-15 21:48 ` [RFC PATCH 05/21] pipe: Conditionalise wakeup " David Howells 2019-10-15 21:48 ` [RFC PATCH 06/21] pipe: Rearrange sequence in pipe_write() to preallocate slot David Howells 2019-10-15 21:48 ` [RFC PATCH 07/21] pipe: Remove redundant wakeup from pipe_write() David Howells 2019-10-15 21:49 ` [RFC PATCH 08/21] pipe: Check for ring full inside of the spinlock in pipe_write() David Howells 2019-10-15 22:20 ` Linus Torvalds 2019-10-15 21:49 ` [RFC PATCH 09/21] uapi: General notification queue definitions David Howells 2019-10-15 21:49 ` [RFC PATCH 10/21] security: Add hooks to rule on setting a watch David Howells 2019-10-15 21:49 ` [RFC PATCH 11/21] security: Add a hook for the point of notification insertion David Howells 2019-10-15 21:49 ` [RFC PATCH 12/21] pipe: Add general notification queue support David Howells 2019-10-15 21:49 ` [RFC PATCH 13/21] keys: Add a notification facility David Howells 2019-10-15 21:49 ` [RFC PATCH 14/21] Add sample notification program David Howells 2019-10-15 21:50 ` [RFC PATCH 15/21] pipe: Allow buffers to be marked read-whole-or-error for notifications David Howells 2019-10-15 21:50 ` [RFC PATCH 16/21] pipe: Add notification lossage handling David Howells 2019-10-15 21:50 ` [RFC PATCH 17/21] Add a general, global device notification watch list David Howells 2019-10-15 21:50 ` [RFC PATCH 18/21] block: Add block layer notifications David Howells 2019-10-15 21:50 ` [RFC PATCH 19/21] usb: Add USB subsystem notifications David Howells 2019-10-15 21:50 ` [RFC PATCH 20/21] selinux: Implement the watch_key security hook David Howells 2019-10-15 21:50 ` [RFC PATCH 21/21] smack: Implement the watch_key and post_notification hooks David Howells 2019-10-15 22:11 ` [RFC PATCH 00/21] pipe: Keyrings, Block and USB notifications James Morris 2019-10-15 22:32 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to='CAHk-=whfCy+WCZ5SXZGi4QEhxXm=EjZjj4R9+o4q-QR3saMyfg@mail.gmail.com' \ --to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \ --cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \ --cc=christian@brauner.io \ --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \ --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \ --cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com \ --cc=raven@themaw.net \ --cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \ --subject='Re: [RFC PATCH 00/21] pipe: Keyrings, Block and USB notifications' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).