From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com>,
raven@themaw.net, Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>,
keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
linux-block <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
LSM List <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/21] pipe: Keyrings, Block and USB notifications
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 15:32:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=whfCy+WCZ5SXZGi4QEhxXm=EjZjj4R9+o4q-QR3saMyfg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <157117606853.15019.15459271147790470307.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Aside from the two small comments, the pipe side looked reasonable,
but I stopped looking when the patches moved on to the notificaiton
part, and maybe I missed something in the earlier ones too.
Which does bring me to the meat of this email: can we please keep the
pipe cleanups and prepwork (and benchmarking) as a separate patch
series? I'd like that to be done separately from the notification
code, since it's re-organization and cleanup - while the eventual goal
is to be able to add messages to the pipe atomically, I think the
series makes sense (and should make sense) on its own.
Linus
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-15 22:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-15 21:47 [RFC PATCH 00/21] pipe: Keyrings, Block and USB notifications David Howells
2019-10-15 21:47 ` [RFC PATCH 01/21] pipe: Reduce #inclusion of pipe_fs_i.h David Howells
2019-10-15 21:48 ` [RFC PATCH 02/21] Add a prelocked wake-up David Howells
2019-10-15 22:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-10-16 17:02 ` Tim Chen
2019-10-15 22:33 ` David Howells
2019-10-16 14:26 ` David Howells
2019-10-16 15:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-10-15 21:48 ` [RFC PATCH 03/21] pipe: Use head and tail pointers for the ring, not cursor and length David Howells
2019-10-16 7:46 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-10-17 10:53 ` David Howells
2019-10-15 21:48 ` [RFC PATCH 04/21] pipe: Advance tail pointer inside of wait spinlock in pipe_read() David Howells
2019-10-15 21:48 ` [RFC PATCH 05/21] pipe: Conditionalise wakeup " David Howells
2019-10-15 21:48 ` [RFC PATCH 06/21] pipe: Rearrange sequence in pipe_write() to preallocate slot David Howells
2019-10-15 21:48 ` [RFC PATCH 07/21] pipe: Remove redundant wakeup from pipe_write() David Howells
2019-10-15 21:49 ` [RFC PATCH 08/21] pipe: Check for ring full inside of the spinlock in pipe_write() David Howells
2019-10-15 22:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-10-15 21:49 ` [RFC PATCH 09/21] uapi: General notification queue definitions David Howells
2019-10-15 21:49 ` [RFC PATCH 10/21] security: Add hooks to rule on setting a watch David Howells
2019-10-15 21:49 ` [RFC PATCH 11/21] security: Add a hook for the point of notification insertion David Howells
2019-10-15 21:49 ` [RFC PATCH 12/21] pipe: Add general notification queue support David Howells
2019-10-15 21:49 ` [RFC PATCH 13/21] keys: Add a notification facility David Howells
2019-10-15 21:49 ` [RFC PATCH 14/21] Add sample notification program David Howells
2019-10-15 21:50 ` [RFC PATCH 15/21] pipe: Allow buffers to be marked read-whole-or-error for notifications David Howells
2019-10-15 21:50 ` [RFC PATCH 16/21] pipe: Add notification lossage handling David Howells
2019-10-15 21:50 ` [RFC PATCH 17/21] Add a general, global device notification watch list David Howells
2019-10-15 21:50 ` [RFC PATCH 18/21] block: Add block layer notifications David Howells
2019-10-15 21:50 ` [RFC PATCH 19/21] usb: Add USB subsystem notifications David Howells
2019-10-15 21:50 ` [RFC PATCH 20/21] selinux: Implement the watch_key security hook David Howells
2019-10-15 21:50 ` [RFC PATCH 21/21] smack: Implement the watch_key and post_notification hooks David Howells
2019-10-15 22:11 ` [RFC PATCH 00/21] pipe: Keyrings, Block and USB notifications James Morris
2019-10-15 22:32 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAHk-=whfCy+WCZ5SXZGi4QEhxXm=EjZjj4R9+o4q-QR3saMyfg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=christian@brauner.io \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com \
--cc=raven@themaw.net \
--cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).