linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
To: Yufen Yu <yuyufen@huawei.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers core: don't do anything in device_del() when device_add() fail
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2021 15:31:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0j1-AA2fWmB0Cr=pr6d+qt_J7Vxr=RPnbvVBfqQYY3KuQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210401130138.2164928-1-yuyufen@huawei.com>

On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 2:56 PM Yufen Yu <yuyufen@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> Recently, our syzbot test reported NULL pointer dereference in
> device_del() by injecting memory allocation fail in device_add().
>
> For now, callers of device_add(), such as add_disk(), may ignore
> device_add()'s fail and go on working. In unregister path, it will
> call device_del() from del_gendisk(). That can cause various NULL
> pointer dereference, including dev->p is NULL in kill_device(),
> 'name' is NULL in sysfs_remove_link(), kobj->sd is 'NULL' when call
> dpm_sysfs_remove(), and so on.
>
> To avoid these kernel panic, we call device_del() only when device_add()
> is success.

The patch looks reasonable to me, but the above is not what it does.

It causes device_del() to be a no-op for devices that have not been
successfully added.

> Signed-off-by: Yufen Yu <yuyufen@huawei.com>
> ---
>  drivers/base/core.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/core.c b/drivers/base/core.c
> index f29839382f81..a10ec5dbc577 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/core.c
> @@ -3380,6 +3380,9 @@ void device_del(struct device *dev)
>         struct class_interface *class_intf;
>         unsigned int noio_flag;
>
> +       if (!dev->p)
> +               return;
> +
>         device_lock(dev);
>         kill_device(dev);
>         device_unlock(dev);
> --

  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-01 18:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-01 13:01 [PATCH] drivers core: don't do anything in device_del() when device_add() fail Yufen Yu
2021-04-01 13:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2021-04-02 15:06 ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAJZ5v0j1-AA2fWmB0Cr=pr6d+qt_J7Vxr=RPnbvVBfqQYY3KuQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yuyufen@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).