From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCAE2C4360C for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 15:19:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90E43207E0 for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 15:19:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cloud.ionos.com header.i=@cloud.ionos.com header.b="UipgyVpA" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726251AbfI0PTO (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Sep 2019 11:19:14 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f68.google.com ([209.85.221.68]:34001 "EHLO mail-wr1-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727076AbfI0PTN (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Sep 2019 11:19:13 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f68.google.com with SMTP id a11so3410832wrx.1 for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 08:19:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cloud.ionos.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=zxFwwjGIQvGB35tuuIBpdcKCYQ7m9hDDPTadLwgitXM=; b=UipgyVpAAVjAaGulHDsikn78p1M5NniK9+odIIu8PDOv9eSGdjW4otvsP2YLs9NrhW POgZ1NfThGboMaiM1lrK1KjHllzMgMvAysatWOhQf5zhawyvq+7OReAjMKy6u1rvWJSM Lmp4IHzN5I+PciEUDkWhGkhNJ7Wvq7Rb/1uSpBvQvzXmfJGqvZtHlX+N8HDLjM/zfHL6 Nb0ke4Nh3+8DVPiebqVWsYiMGDeGgWlOPPF1Fy65+9247nIEw+YhU2R3m0EKQDvuHfrw YmDt+zt5EFVpHt5yNbdW5xXVBzq4bzGTup2hQlVbkF5xymIxmwd1rrXFRHO856aCpvYf Jumw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=zxFwwjGIQvGB35tuuIBpdcKCYQ7m9hDDPTadLwgitXM=; b=WNGDU0YD8Ca3SOS41uLACJpByEwWccaNueDsBHL6lA/SM/BlLb3m1RNQWkdtWxJCLm 3odxa9WtJuq9rHDKgHDq2ORJmgCRzTy0scXhfivjLzFulWwoE2gaAvymkd/1cjpW8LTt elxAkCtj46WL+WRk7VNTq6Yz7Y8x7T7RvM6VH6M8xgZOz2SJDQV88Z4JrW2VSh4Dd4vc I/G5sanIvkJ/+wlrzR6oiqVNwp7dyfG1XGA9x1vaN9t+wcbIGJDX8sf1LC85tekJCnEH /7hss5ugaz3avl5z5miSJKT/BH4fW+ydvqUy5ubtuyAkW4YCPY8yStFDPSh9YJXx3VGe qnSw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUbVoUYn4jsSSvBDXCRMndFBsJ8BBd+zEVO9rVfvy4b3WnNl9Kx UZpTi2nuR7Zrff3p9sfzbTBDHwQ0V/xm4eBWvuLMNg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzJheU9PEnvAxin9mriP0YyxdX5qB3FgPupSBVknghMWrEyDf85Ash1qXk+9Fys9bWH4kAgH/HAKC4sepowMAs= X-Received: by 2002:adf:ea10:: with SMTP id q16mr3617247wrm.356.1569597551685; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 08:19:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190620150337.7847-1-jinpuwang@gmail.com> <20190620150337.7847-11-jinpuwang@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: From: Jinpu Wang Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 17:19:00 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 10/25] ibtrs: server: main functionality To: Bart Van Assche Cc: Jack Wang , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe , Christoph Hellwig , Sagi Grimberg , Jason Gunthorpe , Doug Ledford , Danil Kipnis , rpenyaev@suse.de, Roman Pen Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-block-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 5:11 PM Bart Van Assche wrote: > > On 9/27/19 8:03 AM, Jinpu Wang wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 1:49 AM Bart Van Assche wrote: > >> On 6/20/19 8:03 AM, Jack Wang wrote: > >>> +static char cq_affinity_list[256] = ""; > >> > >> No empty initializers for file-scope variables please. > > > > Is it guaranteed by the compiler, the file-scope variables will be > > empty initialized? > > That is guaranteed by the C standard. See also > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/3373108/why-are-static-variables-auto-initialized-to-zero. > > Bart. Thanks, will remove the initializer.