From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-23.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69B42C4338F for ; Fri, 6 Aug 2021 19:19:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CF1F6115C for ; Fri, 6 Aug 2021 19:19:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S243809AbhHFTUE (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Aug 2021 15:20:04 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39308 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S243805AbhHFTUE (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Aug 2021 15:20:04 -0400 Received: from mail-vs1-xe2a.google.com (mail-vs1-xe2a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e2a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CC68C0613CF for ; Fri, 6 Aug 2021 12:19:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-vs1-xe2a.google.com with SMTP id d20so3226582vso.8 for ; Fri, 06 Aug 2021 12:19:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=t6PYzLJt1arhIuX2nMuzTdwdGEkB8jgPEbuOXvTL9es=; b=IdpA7MlfC2ny1bDRy9UqmOWEJFZl2r3n1H8sd5gYnEZfZoKnsNSIUjwQ60adN0fs0r XJMEtWiKTwkQ9ntZBJdsKFkXpFEgZ8GhEXIl7EHHJ6VnDp1WC1ag5vDEPfKCbBWlbvoB f3Q8w9PK903ZqHXvatZ87jBG8S4hjCgPgcG8mu/dEFlPYXojNFb33GSpHK1+uRnsJBfh JlZR43J80eelL2ONFemLHPgb/+2faNzL37D1ED/FatFW6cMQPkEErZHio/lPWwspxqdi Gm/dkjvq8qTSGkSIeM4CYI1Lps4nUJxuV+bs7bdu5aoPeqTJRoUkH/ZvwBFuoxvuifFM d+2g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=t6PYzLJt1arhIuX2nMuzTdwdGEkB8jgPEbuOXvTL9es=; b=nWxIrE+vkRcDCpY4codFRqHxR6VPG8ql6XfZVtxXvhmE+rcgrvoMW2yIaNUH4HKhOu 9mBzMMOzJFxx3AR/UtFl7Vzw19/uwI3J4hB8poqdoNNffmr4rdmQphXVTg+RP/RK6Vy0 wCh61kY7tddDcrClM/64oMqzubZPKE9XlElR+EzcIDvoZ/3flCJZWIgiYXRVGvIM/e+J M6y+lTJOjl54qTEa5BR09lLUtH70jtqcyz6166l0qZMCTiXU0p3tjDUVCC3UMHj9kOdL xnr009ZhbGYCDIB9JNbtNoGZnRGusAUEvGEYAdOcxC4SeE5YXdbBYLEMLJ/U/Uebs3IQ nhcg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5300+Ri6//M+6hPDqZTnB7PvV1rjPzNTAlQMIQGT6QTG1gAOUzgf AIVy9wOR3A8M9rC3hn3zru4mj8PhueWEsPNcgl+LhA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxj3UOh4bMNktDpfSGlcv4DDEWQr7zCPXJuX6uYmGyJ0nBxO0c6Vg/cd0F7IXEOTcVLaBY2kAOoNyK++85Q4Cw= X-Received: by 2002:a67:2c44:: with SMTP id s65mr6485739vss.29.1628277586373; Fri, 06 Aug 2021 12:19:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210505193655.2414268-1-egranata@google.com> <87pmvlck3p.fsf@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: From: Enrico Granata Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2021 13:19:35 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [virtio-dev] Fwd: [PATCH v2] Provide detailed specification of virtio-blk lifetime metrics To: Stefan Hajnoczi Cc: Cornelia Huck , virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, hch@infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org Hi folks, I am back from my leave of absence, so thank you everyone for your patience This proposal has been outstanding for a while and didn't seem to receive pushback, especially compared to the initial proposal Would it be the right time to put this modification up for a vote? Thanks, - Enrico Thanks, - Enrico On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 8:25 AM Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 11:36:58AM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 14 2021, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > > > > > On Wed, May 05, 2021 at 12:37:26PM -0700, Enrico Granata wrote: > > >> ---------- Forwarded message --------- > > >> From: Enrico Granata > > >> Date: Wed, May 5, 2021 at 1:37 PM > > >> Subject: [PATCH v2] Provide detailed specification of virtio-blk > > >> lifetime metrics > > >> To: > > >> Cc: , , , > > >> , > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> In the course of review, some concerns were surfaced about the > > >> original virtio-blk lifetime proposal, as it depends on the eMMC > > >> spec which is not open > > >> > > >> Add a more detailed description of the meaning of the fields > > >> added by that proposal to the virtio-blk specification, as to > > >> make it feasible to understand and implement the new lifetime > > >> metrics feature without needing to refer to JEDEC's specification > > >> > > >> This patch does not change the meaning of those fields nor add > > >> any new fields, but it is intended to provide an open and more > > >> clear description of the meaning associated with those fields. > > >> > > >> Signed-off-by: Enrico Granata > > >> --- > > >> Changes in v2: > > >> - clarified JEDEC references; > > >> - added VIRTIO_BLK prefix and cleaned up comment syntax; > > >> - clarified reserved block references > > >> > > >> content.tex | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- > > >> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > > > > > Ping? > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi > > > > [Enrico is currently on leave of absence] > > > > Is there any outstanding feedback from the linux-block folks? I've lost > > track of this, I'm afraid. (Your R-b is the only feedback I see on this > > list...) > > > > We can certainly put up a vote. This is one of the things I wanted to > > see fixed for the next release of the standard. > > I have CCed Christoph, linux-block@, and virtualization@. Here is the > link to the patch that we're discussing: > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-block/patch/20210505193655.2414268-1-egranata@google.com/ > > Stefan