From: Chaitanya Kulkarni <Chaitanya.Kulkarni@wdc.com>
To: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 02/18] blktrace: add more definitions for BLK_TC_ACT
Date: Thu, 2 May 2019 03:48:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <SN6PR04MB4527EAAA4A15EA59EB8134D786340@SN6PR04MB4527.namprd04.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: x49sgtyxrhv.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com
Thanks for the reply Jeff.
On 5/1/19 5:56 AM, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> writes:
>
>> On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 09:28:15PM -0700, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote:
>>> @@ -104,7 +120,12 @@ struct blk_io_trace {
>>> __u64 time; /* in nanoseconds */
>>> __u64 sector; /* disk offset */
>>> __u32 bytes; /* transfer length */
>>> +
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_BLKTRACE_EXT
>>> + __u64 action; /* what happened */
>>> +#else
>>> __u32 action; /* what happened */
>>> +#endif /* CONFIG_BLKTRACE_EXT */
>>
>> You can't use CONFIG_ symbols in UAPI headers, as userspace
>> applications won't set it. You also can't ever change the layout of an
>> existing structure in UAPI headers in not backward compatible way.
>
> Right. The blk_io_trace->magic has the lower 8 bits reserved for a
> version number which is checked by userspace. There's no way to
> negotiate a supported version between userspace and the kernel,
> unfortunately. The version number is checked for each trace event.
>
> What you *could* do is to add another trace event with a higher version
> number that includes only the extra data. So each event would be split
> into two: the original event with original content and the new event
> that only contains the new fields. That way the old userspace would
> continue to work, as it would discard the trace events it doesn't
> recognize. Newer userspace could handle both types of events, and merge
> them back together.
>
> There would be a ton of warnings spewed on stderr, unfortunately, but it
> would at least work. I don't see a lot of value in the kernel config
> option, no matter which way we go with this.
>
As you have mentioned this approach will have a lot of stderr, I was
trying to avoid this scenario. If everyone is okay with this will make
this change and resend the series.
> -Jeff
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-02 3:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-01 4:28 [RFC PATCH 00/18] blktrace: add blktrace extension support Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-05-01 4:28 ` [RFC PATCH 01/18] blktrace: increase the size of action mask Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-05-01 15:48 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-05-02 3:43 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-05-02 15:12 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-05-01 4:28 ` [RFC PATCH 02/18] blktrace: add more definitions for BLK_TC_ACT Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-05-01 12:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-01 12:56 ` Jeff Moyer
2019-05-02 3:48 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni [this message]
2019-05-02 3:49 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-05-01 4:28 ` [RFC PATCH 03/18] blktrace: update trace to track more actions Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-05-01 4:28 ` [RFC PATCH 04/18] kernel/trace: add KConfig to enable blktrace_ext Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-05-01 4:28 ` [RFC PATCH 05/18] blktrace: add iopriority mask Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-05-01 4:28 ` [RFC PATCH 06/18] " Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-05-01 4:28 ` [RFC PATCH 07/18] blktrace: allow user to track iopriority Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-05-01 4:28 ` [RFC PATCH 08/18] blktrace: add sysfs ioprio mask Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-05-01 4:28 ` [RFC PATCH 09/18] blktrace: add debug support for extension Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-05-01 4:28 ` [RFC PATCH 10/18] block: set ioprio for write-zeroes, discard etc Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-05-01 4:28 ` [RFC PATCH 11/18] block: set ioprio for zone-reset Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-05-01 4:28 ` [RFC PATCH 12/18] block: set ioprio for flush bio Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-05-01 4:28 ` [RFC PATCH 13/18] drivers: set bio iopriority field Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-05-01 6:23 ` Javier González
2019-05-01 4:28 ` [RFC PATCH 14/18] fs: " Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-05-01 4:28 ` [RFC PATCH 15/18] power/swap: " Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-05-01 4:28 ` [RFC PATCH 16/18] mm: " Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-05-01 4:28 ` [RFC PATCH 17/18] null_blk: add write-zeroes flag to nullb_device Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-05-01 4:28 ` [RFC PATCH 18/18] null_blk: add module param discard/write-zeroes Chaitanya Kulkarni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=SN6PR04MB4527EAAA4A15EA59EB8134D786340@SN6PR04MB4527.namprd04.prod.outlook.com \
--to=chaitanya.kulkarni@wdc.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).