From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9477C07E9A for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 14:25:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 987926117A for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 14:25:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231994AbhGNO2B (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jul 2021 10:28:01 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:25424 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231977AbhGNO2A (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jul 2021 10:28:00 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1626272708; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=/nNLg7RS2OdgpG2Q0vTdal+uwHMaNAnRrGcEAwkI6Yk=; b=XcJY/qIRIDjmd7IpQx+bCGPn1FS2dg/ML7GPcqdpo24uI2fAqGuPQh2fMNZDeWzpCJsc01 ZR8pUZj9YUzouvUAjN32WC/2vW6/4xWq7KeXX4ToCzFV3hJ6NUaVEHRttAuQgllp2GWrbp J+0tFWrm+PgM352MHb4Gd2KlvPZdS/Q= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-205-0Cks6rrQMmG7eyvVV8lXlg-1; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 10:25:07 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 0Cks6rrQMmG7eyvVV8lXlg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACD81106B7D6; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 14:25:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (ovpn-112-200.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.112.200]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AE761000324; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 14:25:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2021 15:25:04 +0100 From: Stefan Hajnoczi To: Cornelia Huck Cc: Enrico Granata , virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, hch@infradead.org Subject: Re: [virtio-dev] Fwd: [PATCH v2] Provide detailed specification of virtio-blk lifetime metrics Message-ID: References: <20210505193655.2414268-1-egranata@google.com> <87pmvlck3p.fsf@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="+Yv6eVjta5rSDZ4E" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87pmvlck3p.fsf@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org --+Yv6eVjta5rSDZ4E Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 11:36:58AM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Wed, Jul 14 2021, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: >=20 > > On Wed, May 05, 2021 at 12:37:26PM -0700, Enrico Granata wrote: > >> ---------- Forwarded message --------- > >> From: Enrico Granata > >> Date: Wed, May 5, 2021 at 1:37 PM > >> Subject: [PATCH v2] Provide detailed specification of virtio-blk > >> lifetime metrics > >> To: > >> Cc: , , , > >> , > >> > >>=20 > >>=20 > >> In the course of review, some concerns were surfaced about the > >> original virtio-blk lifetime proposal, as it depends on the eMMC > >> spec which is not open > >>=20 > >> Add a more detailed description of the meaning of the fields > >> added by that proposal to the virtio-blk specification, as to > >> make it feasible to understand and implement the new lifetime > >> metrics feature without needing to refer to JEDEC's specification > >>=20 > >> This patch does not change the meaning of those fields nor add > >> any new fields, but it is intended to provide an open and more > >> clear description of the meaning associated with those fields. > >>=20 > >> Signed-off-by: Enrico Granata > >> --- > >> Changes in v2: > >> - clarified JEDEC references; > >> - added VIRTIO_BLK prefix and cleaned up comment syntax; > >> - clarified reserved block references > >>=20 > >> content.tex | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- > >> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > > > Ping? > > > > Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi >=20 > [Enrico is currently on leave of absence] >=20 > Is there any outstanding feedback from the linux-block folks? I've lost > track of this, I'm afraid. (Your R-b is the only feedback I see on this > list...) >=20 > We can certainly put up a vote. This is one of the things I wanted to > see fixed for the next release of the standard. I have CCed Christoph, linux-block@, and virtualization@. Here is the link to the patch that we're discussing: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-block/patch/20210505193655.24142= 68-1-egranata@google.com/ Stefan --+Yv6eVjta5rSDZ4E Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEhpWov9P5fNqsNXdanKSrs4Grc8gFAmDu88AACgkQnKSrs4Gr c8hYVAgAtnPGTJOBrka0qF+k5pZMbaxQ0R+0x3XTXkLy9ps2CboeHmh7hrmLCskK eQ+v6hPvAygCGNArFIqg/0AEUuXgu7xAEhwdDtFZ1ahO8ULxxrCFCWnFhhqn0U0k JAalGCzyTHpnDtYGWvvIEPYoF8GBrpeEWTJLrff1KReSujxuDeetB4jpPiLYwqE2 hWNsEeQjlTNuCAGSAMAACG02JCs4thf8GNlAAkMZRD8K1O1iFkNQYmUCpebP9pl9 qkIyPeVhpFCIO0hfDGA5TLoqdRne7vLbBeRawMf6JEESq1plQIpCNP0ez6KVmC9k b5Wb+AaQyWJsP0Wdf/Qb+QbiyGQoeA== =oGMA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --+Yv6eVjta5rSDZ4E--