From: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
To: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: jack@suse.cz, axboe@kernel.dk, osandov@fb.com,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
yukuai3@huawei.com, yi.zhang@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sbitmap: fix possible io hung due to lost wakeup
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2022 15:27:51 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yxe7V3yfBcADoYLE@kbusch-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220803121504.212071-1-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>
On Wed, Aug 03, 2022 at 08:15:04PM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote:
> wait_cnt = atomic_dec_return(&ws->wait_cnt);
> - if (wait_cnt <= 0) {
> - int ret;
> + /*
> + * For concurrent callers of this, callers should call this function
> + * again to wakeup a new batch on a different 'ws'.
> + */
> + if (wait_cnt < 0 || !waitqueue_active(&ws->wait))
> + return true;
If wait_cnt is '0', but the waitqueue_active happens to be false due to racing
with add_wait_queue(), this returns true so the caller will retry. The next
atomic_dec will set the current waitstate wait_cnt < 0, which also forces an
early return true. When does the wake up happen, or wait_cnt and wait_index get
updated in that case?
> - wake_batch = READ_ONCE(sbq->wake_batch);
> + if (wait_cnt > 0)
> + return false;
>
> - /*
> - * Pairs with the memory barrier in sbitmap_queue_resize() to
> - * ensure that we see the batch size update before the wait
> - * count is reset.
> - */
> - smp_mb__before_atomic();
> + wake_batch = READ_ONCE(sbq->wake_batch);
>
> - /*
> - * For concurrent callers of this, the one that failed the
> - * atomic_cmpxhcg() race should call this function again
> - * to wakeup a new batch on a different 'ws'.
> - */
> - ret = atomic_cmpxchg(&ws->wait_cnt, wait_cnt, wake_batch);
> - if (ret == wait_cnt) {
> - sbq_index_atomic_inc(&sbq->wake_index);
> - wake_up_nr(&ws->wait, wake_batch);
> - return false;
> - }
> + /*
> + * Wake up first in case that concurrent callers decrease wait_cnt
> + * while waitqueue is empty.
> + */
> + wake_up_nr(&ws->wait, wake_batch);
>
> - return true;
> - }
> + /*
> + * Pairs with the memory barrier in sbitmap_queue_resize() to
> + * ensure that we see the batch size update before the wait
> + * count is reset.
> + *
> + * Also pairs with the implicit barrier between decrementing wait_cnt
> + * and checking for waitqueue_active() to make sure waitqueue_active()
> + * sees result of the wakeup if atomic_dec_return() has seen the result
> + * of atomic_set().
> + */
> + smp_mb__before_atomic();
> +
> + /*
> + * Increase wake_index before updating wait_cnt, otherwise concurrent
> + * callers can see valid wait_cnt in old waitqueue, which can cause
> + * invalid wakeup on the old waitqueue.
> + */
> + sbq_index_atomic_inc(&sbq->wake_index);
> + atomic_set(&ws->wait_cnt, wake_batch);
>
> return false;
> }
> --
> 2.31.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-06 21:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-03 12:15 [PATCH] sbitmap: fix possible io hung due to lost wakeup Yu Kuai
2022-08-13 5:58 ` Yu Kuai
2022-08-23 13:37 ` Jens Axboe
2022-09-06 21:27 ` Keith Busch [this message]
2022-09-07 1:12 ` Yu Kuai
2022-09-07 10:23 ` Jan Kara
2022-09-07 14:13 ` Keith Busch
2022-09-07 16:41 ` Jan Kara
2022-09-07 18:20 ` Keith Busch
2022-09-08 9:33 ` Jan Kara
2022-09-08 9:45 ` Yu Kuai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yxe7V3yfBcADoYLE@kbusch-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com \
--to=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=osandov@fb.com \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
--cc=yukuai1@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).