linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] io_uring: remove wait loop spurious wakeups
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2019 15:22:43 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a1f8de23-fcad-7252-cbd4-8f5e617056cd@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <99bfb7aa-6980-fc14-32f7-a479dea63eb4@gmail.com>

On 10/8/19 2:58 PM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> On 08/10/2019 20:00, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 10/8/19 10:43 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>>> On 08/10/2019 06:16, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>>> On 10/7/19 5:18 PM, Pavel Begunkov (Silence) wrote:
>>>>> From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> Any changes interesting to tasks waiting in io_cqring_wait() are
>>>>> commited with io_cqring_ev_posted(). However, io_ring_drop_ctx_refs()
>>>>> also tries to do that but with no reason, that means spurious wakeups
>>>>> every io_free_req() and io_uring_enter().
>>>>>
>>>>> Just use percpu_ref_put() instead.
>>>>
>>>> Looks good, this is a leftover from when the ctx teardown used
>>>> the waitqueue as well.
>>>>
>>> BTW, is there a reason for ref-counting in struct io_kiocb? I understand
>>> the idea behind submission reference, but don't see any actual part
>>> needing it.
>>
>> In short, it's to prevent the completion running before we're done with
>> the iocb on the submission side.
> 
> Yep, that's what I expected. Perhaps I missed something, but what I've
> seen following code paths all the way down, it either
> 1. gets error / completes synchronously and then frees req locally
> 2. or passes it further (e.g. async list) and never accesses it after

As soon as the IO is passed on, it can complete. In fact, it can complete
even _before_ that call returns. That's the issue. Obviously this isn't
true for purely polled IO, but it is true for IRQ based IO.

-- 
Jens Axboe


  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-08 21:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-07 23:18 [PATCH] io_uring: remove wait loop spurious wakeups Pavel Begunkov (Silence)
2019-10-08  3:16 ` Jens Axboe
2019-10-08 16:43   ` Pavel Begunkov
2019-10-08 17:00     ` Jens Axboe
2019-10-08 20:58       ` Pavel Begunkov
2019-10-08 21:22         ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2019-10-08 22:05           ` Pavel Begunkov
2019-10-09  2:54             ` Jens Axboe
2019-10-09  9:19               ` Pavel Begunkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a1f8de23-fcad-7252-cbd4-8f5e617056cd@kernel.dk \
    --to=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).