From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>,
Sumit Saxena <sumit.saxena@broadcom.com>,
Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@broadcom.com>,
Shivasharan Srikanteshwara
<shivasharan.srikanteshwara@broadcom.com>
Subject: Re: [patch V5 4/8] nvme-pci: Simplify interrupt allocation
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 10:54:32 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1902151053520.1646@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1902151051470.1646@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
On Fri, 15 Feb 2019, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Feb 2019, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > > + */
> > > + if (nrirqs == 1)
> > > + nr_read_queues = 0;
> > > + else if (write_queues >= nrirqs)
> > > + nr_read_queues = nrirqs - 1;
> >
> > ... while this seem to ensure that we carve out one write queue out of
> > the irq set. It looks like a departure from the original code, which
> > would set nr_read_queues to 1 in that particular case.
>
> Bah. right you are.
That needs to be:
nr_read_queues = 1;
obviously.
/me blushes.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-15 9:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-14 20:47 [patch V5 0/8] genirq/affinity: Overhaul the multiple interrupt sets support Thomas Gleixner
2019-02-14 20:47 ` [patch V5 1/8] genirq/affinity: Code consolidation Thomas Gleixner
2019-02-14 20:47 ` [patch V5 2/8] genirq/affinity: Store interrupt sets size in struct irq_affinity Thomas Gleixner
2019-02-14 20:47 ` [patch V5 3/8] genirq/affinity: Add new callback for (re)calculating interrupt sets Thomas Gleixner
2019-02-14 20:47 ` [patch V5 4/8] nvme-pci: Simplify interrupt allocation Thomas Gleixner
2019-02-14 22:41 ` Ming Lei
2019-02-14 23:55 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-02-15 23:00 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-02-15 9:24 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-02-15 9:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-02-15 9:54 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2019-02-14 20:48 ` [patch V5 5/8] genirq/affinity: Remove the leftovers of the original set support Thomas Gleixner
2019-02-14 20:48 ` [patch V5 6/8] PCI/MSI: Remove obsolete sanity checks for multiple interrupt sets Thomas Gleixner
2019-02-14 20:48 ` [patch V5 7/8] genirq/affinity: Set is_managed in the spreading function Thomas Gleixner
2019-02-14 20:48 ` [patch V5 8/8] genirq/affinity: Add support for non-managed affinity sets Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.21.1902151053520.1646@nanos.tec.linutronix.de \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=kashyap.desai@broadcom.com \
--cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=shivasharan.srikanteshwara@broadcom.com \
--cc=sumit.saxena@broadcom.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).