From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 634BBC43387 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 09:40:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8EC42054F for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 09:40:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=fjfi.cvut.cz header.i=@fjfi.cvut.cz header.b="V/t4hTHE" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727487AbfAQJky (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jan 2019 04:40:54 -0500 Received: from mailgw1.fjfi.cvut.cz ([147.32.9.3]:51454 "EHLO mailgw1.fjfi.cvut.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726171AbfAQJkx (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jan 2019 04:40:53 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailgw1.fjfi.cvut.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D9B6ABB85; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 10:40:52 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fjfi.cvut.cz; s=20151024; t=1547718052; i=@fjfi.cvut.cz; bh=G7+rdDuA/inGcCz3PtDtqAQ3Ba6G1gLeDOe0nzC9sPw=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=V/t4hTHEHZJD8mKh9Kt8vaL4O5KBG/ythVzRz7jxE7BzHRecx8gnNWDAqqSWZhYc7 R6YQKXKpMjHMhFCYoJquceKNI+Uf0Uh3DnfxFhhd8qpsDfDH11DTv6txnHJroyr2IA DNMzE55Ma4gQ2UjtqaFNE/D9SWmqpN/DXwqlDZOI= X-CTU-FNSPE-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at fjfi.cvut.cz Received: from mailgw1.fjfi.cvut.cz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mailgw1.fjfi.cvut.cz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10022) with ESMTP id QiiHQJmMOFno; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 10:40:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from linux.fjfi.cvut.cz (linux.fjfi.cvut.cz [147.32.5.111]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailgw1.fjfi.cvut.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B48EFABB7D; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 10:40:49 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mailgw1.fjfi.cvut.cz B48EFABB7D Received: by linux.fjfi.cvut.cz (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 729C86004E; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 10:40:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by linux.fjfi.cvut.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 625476002A; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 10:40:49 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 10:40:49 +0100 (CET) From: David Kozub To: Christoph Hellwig cc: Jens Axboe , Scott Bauer , Jonathan Derrick , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jonas Rabenstein Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] block: sed-opal: support shadow MBR done flag and write In-Reply-To: <20190117085727.GA14092@infradead.org> Message-ID: References: <20190116225533.BD1396004E@linux.fjfi.cvut.cz> <20190117085727.GA14092@infradead.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (LRH 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-block-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 17 Jan 2019, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > the way the series appear looks odd, because it wasn't threaded or > even ordered, and the patches from Jonas seem to have been sent out > by you under his name. Can you resend them carefully threaded, all > mails from you with the additional from header for resends? Ouch. I'm sorry about the ordering/threading. I (wrongly) assumed that if I just send the mails in order, that suffices. I'll try to fix that in v2. W.r.t. "from": Most of the patches were originally created by Jonas. I touched some in order to apply review suggestions or make some small fixes. But some stayed identical to Jonas' version and I didn't want to strip him of authorship. I used git format-patch to produce the mails and the commit author was propagated to the from header. What is the proper way when I am not the author? Best regards, David