linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de>,
	Khazhismel Kumykov <khazhy@google.com>,
	Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>,
	"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
	Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>,
	John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/5] blk-mq: Fix races between iterating over requests and freeing requests
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 09:29:54 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d1d3c068-4446-145b-34c6-12fa1f30d4da@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YISzLal7Ur7jyuiy@T590>

On 4/24/21 5:09 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
> Terminating all pending commands can't avoid the issue wrt. request UAF,
> so far blk_mq_tagset_wait_completed_request() is used for making sure
> that all pending requests are really aborted.
> 
> However, blk_mq_wait_for_tag_iter() still may return before
> blk_mq_wait_for_tag_iter() is done because blk_mq_wait_for_tag_iter()
> supposes all request reference is just done inside bt_tags_iter(),
> especially .iter_rwsem and read rcu lock is added in bt_tags_iter().

Hi Ming,

I think that we agree that completing a request from inside a tag
iteration callback function may cause the request completion to happen
after tag iteration has finished. This can happen because
blk_mq_complete_request() may redirect completion processing to another
CPU via an IPI.

But can this mechanism trigger a use-after-free by itself? If request
completion is redirected to another CPU, the request is still considered
pending and request queue freezing won't complete. Request queue
freezing will only succeed after __blk_mq_free_request() has been called
because it is __blk_mq_free_request() that calls blk_queue_exit().

In other words, do we really need the new
blk_mq_complete_request_locally() function?

Did I perhaps miss something?

Thanks,

Bart.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-04-26 16:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-21  0:02 [PATCH v7 0/5] blk-mq: Fix a race between iterating over requests and freeing requests Bart Van Assche
2021-04-21  0:02 ` [PATCH v7 1/5] blk-mq: Move the elevator_exit() definition Bart Van Assche
2021-04-21  0:02 ` [PATCH v7 2/5] blk-mq: Introduce atomic variants of blk_mq_(all_tag|tagset_busy)_iter Bart Van Assche
2021-04-21  0:02 ` [PATCH v7 3/5] blk-mq: Fix races between iterating over requests and freeing requests Bart Van Assche
2021-04-22  2:25   ` Ming Lei
2021-04-22  4:01     ` Bart Van Assche
2021-04-22  7:23       ` Ming Lei
2021-04-22  3:15   ` Ming Lei
2021-04-22  3:54     ` Bart Van Assche
2021-04-22  7:13       ` Ming Lei
2021-04-22 15:51         ` Bart Van Assche
2021-04-23  3:52           ` Ming Lei
2021-04-23 17:52             ` Bart Van Assche
2021-04-25  0:09               ` Ming Lei
2021-04-25 21:01                 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-04-26  0:55                   ` Ming Lei
2021-04-26 16:29                 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2021-04-27  0:11                   ` Ming Lei
2021-04-21  0:02 ` [PATCH v7 4/5] blk-mq: Make it safe to use RCU to iterate over blk_mq_tag_set.tag_list Bart Van Assche
2021-04-21  0:02 ` [PATCH v7 5/5] blk-mq: Fix races between blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues() and iterating over tags Bart Van Assche
2021-04-21 14:40 ` [PATCH v7 0/5] blk-mq: Fix a race between iterating over requests and freeing requests Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d1d3c068-4446-145b-34c6-12fa1f30d4da@acm.org \
    --to=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=dwagner@suse.de \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com \
    --cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
    --cc=khazhy@google.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).