From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] nvme: introduce FAILUP handling for REQ_FAILFAST_TRANSPORT
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2021 18:23:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d5a4867d-5dda-a5b7-2375-658da9630d63@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210416150301.GC16047@redhat.com>
On 4/16/21 5:03 PM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 16 2021 at 10:07am -0400,
> Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> wrote:
>
>> On 4/16/21 1:15 AM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
>>> If REQ_FAILFAST_TRANSPORT is set it means the driver should not retry
>>> IO that completed with transport errors. REQ_FAILFAST_TRANSPORT is
>>> set by multipathing software (e.g. dm-multipath) before it issues IO.
>>>
>>> Update NVMe to allow failover of requests marked with either
>>> REQ_NVME_MPATH or REQ_FAILFAST_TRANSPORT. This allows such requests
>>> to be given a disposition of either FAILOVER or FAILUP respectively.
>>> FAILUP handling ensures a retryable error is returned up from NVMe.
>>>
>>> Introduce nvme_failup_req() for use in nvme_complete_rq() if
>>> nvme_decide_disposition() returns FAILUP. nvme_failup_req() ensures
>>> the request is completed with a retryable IO error when appropriate.
>>> __nvme_end_req() was factored out for use by both nvme_end_req() and
>>> nvme_failup_req().
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/nvme/host/core.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>>> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
>>> index 4134cf3c7e48..10375197dd53 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
>>> @@ -299,6 +299,7 @@ enum nvme_disposition {
>>> COMPLETE,
>>> RETRY,
>>> FAILOVER,
>>> + FAILUP,
>>> };
>>>
>>> static inline enum nvme_disposition nvme_decide_disposition(struct request *req)
>>> @@ -318,10 +319,11 @@ static inline enum nvme_disposition nvme_decide_disposition(struct request *req)
>>> nvme_req(req)->retries >= nvme_max_retries)
>>> return COMPLETE;
>>>
>>> - if (req->cmd_flags & REQ_NVME_MPATH) {
>>> + if (req->cmd_flags & (REQ_NVME_MPATH | REQ_FAILFAST_TRANSPORT)) {
>>> if (nvme_is_path_error(nvme_req(req)->status) ||
>>> blk_queue_dying(req->q))
>>> - return FAILOVER;
>>> + return (req->cmd_flags & REQ_NVME_MPATH) ?
>>> + FAILOVER : FAILUP;
>>> } else {
>>> if (blk_queue_dying(req->q))
>>> return COMPLETE;
>>> @@ -330,10 +332,8 @@ static inline enum nvme_disposition nvme_decide_disposition(struct request *req)
>>> return RETRY;
>>> }
>>>
>>> -static inline void nvme_end_req(struct request *req)
>>> +static inline void __nvme_end_req(struct request *req, blk_status_t status)
>>> {
>>> - blk_status_t status = nvme_error_status(nvme_req(req)->status);
>>> -
>>> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ZONED) &&
>>> req_op(req) == REQ_OP_ZONE_APPEND)
>>> req->__sector = nvme_lba_to_sect(req->q->queuedata,
>>> @@ -343,6 +343,24 @@ static inline void nvme_end_req(struct request *req)
>>> blk_mq_end_request(req, status);
>>> }
>>>
>>> +static inline void nvme_end_req(struct request *req)
>>> +{
>>> + __nvme_end_req(req, nvme_error_status(nvme_req(req)->status));
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static void nvme_failup_req(struct request *req)
>>> +{
>>> + blk_status_t status = nvme_error_status(nvme_req(req)->status);
>>> +
>>> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!blk_path_error(status))) {
>>> + pr_debug("Request meant for failover but blk_status_t (errno=%d) was not retryable.\n",
>>> + blk_status_to_errno(status));
>>> + status = BLK_STS_IOERR;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + __nvme_end_req(req, status);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> void nvme_complete_rq(struct request *req)
>>> {
>>> trace_nvme_complete_rq(req);
>>> @@ -361,6 +379,9 @@ void nvme_complete_rq(struct request *req)
>>> case FAILOVER:
>>> nvme_failover_req(req);
>>> return;
>>> + case FAILUP:
>>> + nvme_failup_req(req);
>>> + return;
>>> }
>>> }
>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nvme_complete_rq);
>>>
>>
>> Hmm. Quite convoluted, methinks.
>
> Maybe you didn't read the header or patch?
>
> I'm cool with critical review when it is clear the reviewer fully
> understands the patch but... ;)
>
>> Shouldn't this achieve the same thing?
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
>> index e89ec2522ca6..8c36a2196b66 100644
>> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
>> @@ -303,8 +303,10 @@ static inline enum nvme_disposition
>> nvme_decide_disposition(struct request *req)
>> if (likely(nvme_req(req)->status == 0))
>> return COMPLETE;
>>
>> - if (blk_noretry_request(req) ||
>> - (nvme_req(req)->status & NVME_SC_DNR) ||
>> + if (blk_noretry_request(req))
>> + nvme_req(req)->status |= NVME_SC_DNR;
>> +
>> + if ((nvme_req(req)->status & NVME_SC_DNR) ||
>> nvme_req(req)->retries >= nvme_max_retries)
>> return COMPLETE;
>
> Definitely won't achieve the same. And especially not with patch 1/4
> ("nvme: return BLK_STS_DO_NOT_RETRY if the DNR bit is set") that you
> gave your Reviewed-by to earlier.
>
Ah. Right. Sorry.
> Instead of "FAILUP", I thought about using "FAILUP_AND_OVER" to convey
> that this is a variant of failover. Meaning it takes the same patch as
> nvme "FAILOVER" until the very end; where it does REQ_FAILFAST_TRANSPORT
> specific work detailed in nvme_failup_req().
>
All very intricate; will need to check the patches in their combined
version.
Not deliberately stalling, mind you, just wanting to figure out what the
net result will be.
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke Kernel Storage Architect
hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: F. Imendörffer, HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-16 16:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-15 23:15 [PATCH v2 0/4] nvme: improve error handling and ana_state to work well with dm-multipath Mike Snitzer
2021-04-15 23:15 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] nvme: return BLK_STS_DO_NOT_RETRY if the DNR bit is set Mike Snitzer
2021-04-15 23:48 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2021-04-16 13:51 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-04-15 23:15 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] nvme: allow local retry for requests with REQ_FAILFAST_TRANSPORT set Mike Snitzer
2021-04-16 14:01 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-04-16 14:53 ` Mike Snitzer
2021-04-16 15:20 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-04-16 15:32 ` Mike Snitzer
2021-04-15 23:15 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] nvme: introduce FAILUP handling for REQ_FAILFAST_TRANSPORT Mike Snitzer
2021-04-16 14:07 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-04-16 15:03 ` Mike Snitzer
2021-04-16 16:23 ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2021-04-16 20:03 ` [dm-devel] " Ewan D. Milne
2021-04-16 20:52 ` Ewan D. Milne
2021-04-16 21:44 ` Mike Snitzer
2021-04-15 23:15 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] nvme: decouple basic ANA log page re-read support from native multipathing Mike Snitzer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d5a4867d-5dda-a5b7-2375-658da9630d63@suse.de \
--to=hare@suse.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).