linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	Jianpeng Ma <jianpeng.ma@intel.com>,
	Qiaowei Ren <qiaowei.ren@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/20] bcache: add initial data structures for nvm pages
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 11:58:23 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e2b05bd8-8129-73f1-2f17-00eb95ce5184@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <76adf7d2-821b-c7a5-426e-4d3963d36455@kernel.dk>

On 2/10/21 11:09 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 2/9/21 10:07 PM, Coly Li wrote:
>> +struct bch_nvm_pgalloc_recs {
>> +union {
>> +	struct {
>> +		struct bch_nvm_pages_owner_head	*owner;
>> +		struct bch_nvm_pgalloc_recs	*next;
>> +		__u8				magic[16];
>> +		__u8				owner_uuid[16];
>> +		__u32				size;
>> +		__u32				used;
>> +		__u64				_pad[4];
>> +		struct bch_pgalloc_rec		recs[];
>> +	};
>> +	__u8	pad[8192];
>> +};
>> +};
> 

Hi Jens,

> This doesn't look right in a user header, any user API should be 32-bit
> and 64-bit agnostic.

The above data structure is stored in NVDIMM as allocator's meta data.
It is designed to be directly accessed (in future update) as in-memory
object, but stored on non-volatiled memory like on-disk data structure.

To me, it is fine to use unsigned int/long/long long to define the
members, because nvdimm driver only works on 64bit platform. It is just
unclear to me which form/style I should use to define such data
structure. On one side they are stores as non-volatiled media, on other
side they are accessed directly as in-memory object...


> 
>> +struct bch_nvm_pages_owner_head {
>> +	__u8			uuid[16];
>> +	char			label[BCH_NVM_PAGES_LABEL_SIZE];
>> +	/* Per-namespace own lists */
>> +	struct bch_nvm_pgalloc_recs	*recs[BCH_NVM_PAGES_NAMESPACES_MAX];
>> +};
> 
> Same here.

For the above pointer, it is the same reason. In later version, such
object on NVDIMM will be referenced directly by an in-memory pointer
like we normally do for an in-memory object.

Therefore I do treat the data structure as in-memory object after the
DAX mapping accomplished. If not define it as an in-memory pointer, I
have to cast it into (void *) every time when I use it.


> 
>> +/* heads[0] is always for nvm_pages internal usage */
>> +struct bch_owner_list_head {
>> +union {
>> +	struct {
>> +		__u32				size;
>> +		__u32				used;
>> +		__u64				_pad[4];
>> +		struct bch_nvm_pages_owner_head	heads[];
>> +	};
>> +	__u8	pad[8192];
>> +};
>> +};
> 
> And here.
> 
>> +#define BCH_MAX_OWNER_LIST				\
>> +	((sizeof(struct bch_owner_list_head) -		\
>> +	 offsetof(struct bch_owner_list_head, heads)) /	\
>> +	 sizeof(struct bch_nvm_pages_owner_head))
>> +
>> +/* The on-media bit order is local CPU order */
>> +struct bch_nvm_pages_sb {
>> +	__u64			csum;
>> +	__u64			ns_start;
>> +	__u64			sb_offset;
>> +	__u64			version;
>> +	__u8			magic[16];
>> +	__u8			uuid[16];
>> +	__u32			page_size;
>> +	__u32			total_namespaces_nr;
>> +	__u32			this_namespace_nr;
>> +	union {
>> +		__u8		set_uuid[16];
>> +		__u64		set_magic;
>> +	};
> 
> This doesn't look like it packs right either.

This is my mimicry from bcache code, which uses the least significant 8
bytes from the randomly generated UUID as a magic number. It is solid
and not changed during the whole life cycle for the nvm pages set.


> 
>> +
>> +	__u64			flags;
>> +	__u64			seq;
>> +
>> +	__u64			feature_compat;
>> +	__u64			feature_incompat;
>> +	__u64			feature_ro_compat;
>> +
>> +	/* For allocable nvm pages from buddy systems */
>> +	__u64			pages_offset;
>> +	__u64			pages_total;
>> +
>> +	__u64			pad[8];
>> +
>> +	/* Only on the first name space */
>> +	struct bch_owner_list_head	*owner_list_head;
> 
> And here's another pointer...
> 

Same reason for I use it as an in-memory pointer.

The above definition is just using all the structures as in-memory
object, the difference is just they are non-volatiled after reboot.

Thanks.

Coly Li

  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-11  3:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-10  5:07 [PATCH 00/20] bcache patches for Linux v5.12 Coly Li
2021-02-10  5:07 ` [PATCH 01/20] bcache: consider the fragmentation when update the writeback rate Coly Li
2021-02-10  5:07 ` [PATCH 02/20] bcache: Fix register_device_aync typo Coly Li
2021-02-10  5:07 ` [PATCH 03/20] Revert "bcache: Kill btree_io_wq" Coly Li
2021-02-10  5:07 ` [PATCH 04/20] bcache: Give btree_io_wq correct semantics again Coly Li
2021-02-10  5:07 ` [PATCH 05/20] bcache: Move journal work to new flush wq Coly Li
2021-02-10  5:07 ` [PATCH 06/20] bcache: Avoid comma separated statements Coly Li
2021-02-10  5:07 ` [PATCH 07/20] bcache: add initial data structures for nvm pages Coly Li
2021-02-10 15:09   ` Jens Axboe
2021-02-11  3:58     ` Coly Li [this message]
2021-02-10  5:07 ` [PATCH 08/20] bcache: initialize the nvm pages allocator Coly Li
2021-02-10  5:07 ` [PATCH 09/20] bcache: initialization of the buddy Coly Li
2021-02-10  5:07 ` [PATCH 10/20] bcache: bch_nvm_alloc_pages() " Coly Li
2021-02-10  5:07 ` [PATCH 11/20] bcache: bch_nvm_free_pages() " Coly Li
2021-02-10  5:07 ` [PATCH 12/20] bcache: get allocated pages from specific owner Coly Li
2021-02-10  5:07 ` [PATCH 13/20] bcache: persist owner info when alloc/free pages Coly Li
2021-02-10  5:07 ` [PATCH 14/20] bcache: use bucket index for SET_GC_MARK() in bch_btree_gc_finish() Coly Li
2021-02-10  5:07 ` [PATCH 15/20] bcache: add BCH_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_NVDIMM_META into incompat feature set Coly Li
2021-02-10  5:07 ` [PATCH 16/20] bcache: initialize bcache journal for NVDIMM meta device Coly Li
2021-02-10  5:07 ` [PATCH 17/20] bcache: support storing bcache journal into " Coly Li
2021-02-18 21:21   ` Nix
2021-02-10  5:07 ` [PATCH 18/20] bcache: read jset from NVDIMM pages for journal replay Coly Li
2021-02-10  5:07 ` [PATCH 19/20] bcache: add sysfs interface register_nvdimm_meta to register NVDIMM meta device Coly Li
2021-02-10  5:07 ` [PATCH 20/20] bcache: only initialize nvm-pages allocator when CONFIG_BCACHE_NVM_PAGES configured Coly Li
2021-02-10 15:11 ` [PATCH 00/20] bcache patches for Linux v5.12 Jens Axboe
2021-02-12 16:09   ` Coly Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e2b05bd8-8129-73f1-2f17-00eb95ce5184@suse.de \
    --to=colyli@suse.de \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=jianpeng.ma@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=qiaowei.ren@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).