From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BED6BC49EA6 for ; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 00:48:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1198610C7 for ; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 00:48:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232300AbhFYAuT (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jun 2021 20:50:19 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43070 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229521AbhFYAuT (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jun 2021 20:50:19 -0400 Received: from mail-io1-xd29.google.com (mail-io1-xd29.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d29]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5285FC061574 for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 17:47:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-io1-xd29.google.com with SMTP id g22so10676543iom.1 for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 17:47:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8nSJpWYHGCpkuNBOhQkSMR2oaoPzxAOpHnbMVy+0cK8=; b=P3alooKh/efB4RQG5GaJALO3lY9ThVgtLlrwm1wUUa9sxoaJjMGm1q5OR4IK1l/j2I rvNQbylzYx/oU9pNqkCTv68GhHmhJKYqwglwzPy55q/b+XmUlhKjN2CSq1OySvbhlSnV W/PuxSUrURMJPWwE7JqEaqhE7Vio1h1hI42BfJ7eQmLLUEzo1x31X7oeardi2s2oJF1n y6YeuQLY3yFm/bukZo562ue/ALj4MfIFxIaMbh8R42KUokh5LXfdLYC2fL5GZxuzK09n lCjKW5EYjWY7NudHpzUSRaxWY5QCynetbGaJ8QfPRRVIk81inNQqc5+z2lo4VAf9gxMj 3dkw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=8nSJpWYHGCpkuNBOhQkSMR2oaoPzxAOpHnbMVy+0cK8=; b=NjWV1m1f2rgSAOvxRPNkDRiCeWElxPm+lhoExZapurBr3EyjeoP1CjL6WLGxfbR0Y9 +CzjdGYedp9Ymy4BE6iesqr57ZibL7MpcJFyUjIcw0KLZqlyAfYQl0P7/IexVow0WjqX 3P22wn5uyLPadZERuOmNV/YNZKRt4F7mJt896qPiLuoL1xievQMhx8Ll0jKZamUCThmz 98WeJEoJLAlpHvCUx8u5R+dqTmSbCwoSYslvbzWSGJznNc2SHX0paPmBQOnvx6VCgRqD y3FlKJm9VglSfRZRfLcOz2Tzc2eNVoDKInlI1ZIs+o71MnWki1LjPBVf+d+ZTe9YgWZo FFfQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532itAMgB+x7B++ZJpaJVms+Tjc56D4Q58XKH00EqaN+3/OlLtBs gW7ZjfK3+rAPVZjMVuyn8Qq4mQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxpcWjhp/ELSXOF9gQiJ26hj0rLvrj8oktAvPr07ek67h2zv74inkQ2etInABitPqQWi31raA== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:8a07:: with SMTP id w7mr6338421iod.154.1624582078752; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 17:47:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.134] ([198.8.77.61]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m7sm2661303ild.49.2021.06.24.17.47.57 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 24 Jun 2021 17:47:58 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 0/4] block and nvme passthrough error handling To: Keith Busch , linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, sagi@grimberg.me, hch@lst.de, linux-block@vger.kernel.org Cc: Yuanyuan Zhong , Casey Chen , Ming Lei References: <20210610214437.641245-1-kbusch@kernel.org> <20210622145718.GA11584@redsun51.ssa.fujisawa.hgst.com> From: Jens Axboe Message-ID: Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 18:47:56 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210622145718.GA11584@redsun51.ssa.fujisawa.hgst.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org On 6/22/21 8:57 AM, Keith Busch wrote: > Jens, > > Do you have any thoughts on this series? I think it's good to go and > have received reviews, and just want to check if you are okay to take > this through block. Looks fine to me, I have applied it for 5.14. Thanks. -- Jens Axboe