From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8820EC3B188 for ; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 02:46:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F58624677 for ; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 02:46:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729528AbgBMCqk (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Feb 2020 21:46:40 -0500 Received: from szxga05-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.191]:9727 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729527AbgBMCqk (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Feb 2020 21:46:40 -0500 Received: from DGGEMS408-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.59]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 150E3A4D3ED86482C0CF; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 10:46:39 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.173.220.74] (10.173.220.74) by DGGEMS408-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.208) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.439.0; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 10:46:34 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH] bdi: fix use-after-free for bdi device To: Tejun Heo CC: , , , References: <20200211140038.146629-1-yuyufen@huawei.com> <20200212213344.GE80993@mtj.thefacebook.com> From: Yufen Yu Message-ID: Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 10:46:34 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.3.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200212213344.GE80993@mtj.thefacebook.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.173.220.74] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-block-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org Hi, On 2020/2/13 5:33, Tejun Heo wrote: > So, I don't see why bdi->dev should be freed before bdi itself does. > Would something like the following work? > > bdi_unregister() > { > ... > if (bdi->dev) { > ... > device_get(bdi->dev); // to be put on release > device_unregister(bdi->dev); > } > ... > } > > release_bdi() > { > ... > if (bdi->dev) { > // warn if dev is still registered > device_put(bdi->dev); > } > ... > } For each time of register, bdi_register() will try to create a new 'dev'. bdi_register bdi_register_va if (bdi->dev) // if bdi->dev is not NULL, return directly return 0; dev = device_create_vargs()... So, I think freeing bdi->dev until bdi itself does may be a problem for drivers that supported re-registration bdi, such as: commit b6f8fec4448aa52a8c36a392aa1ca2ea99acd460 Author: Jan Kara Date: Wed Mar 8 17:48:31 2017 +0100 block: Allow bdi re-registration SCSI can call device_add_disk() several times for one request queue when a device in unbound and bound, creating new gendisk each time. This will lead to bdi being repeatedly registered and unregistered.