linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: "hare@suse.de" <hare@suse.de>,
	"axboe@kernel.dk" <axboe@kernel.dk>, "hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de>,
	"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"pragalla@codeaurora.org" <pragalla@codeaurora.org>,
	"kashyap.desai@broadcom.com" <kashyap.desai@broadcom.com>,
	yuyufen <yuyufen@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 2/3] blk-mq: Freeze and quiesce all queues for tagset in elevator_exit()
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 10:00:02 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fff92b15-d483-ad6a-bb01-ef61117b7cbd@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4ffaba53-100a-43a5-8746-b753d4153be5@huawei.com>

On 3/16/21 9:15 AM, John Garry wrote:
> I'll have a look at this ASAP -  a bit busy.
> 
> But a quick scan and I notice this:
> 
>  > @@ -226,6 +226,7 @@ static inline void __blk_mq_put_driver_tag(struct 
> blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
>  >                          struct request *rq)
>  >   {
>  >       blk_mq_put_tag(hctx->tags, rq->mq_ctx, rq->tag);
>  > +    rcu_assign_pointer(hctx->tags->rqs[rq->tag], NULL);
> 
> Wasn't a requirement to not touch the fastpath at all, including even if 
> only NULLifying a pointer?
> 
> IIRC, Kashyap some time ago had a patch like above (but without RCU 
> usage), but the request from Jens was to not touch the fastpath.
> 
> Maybe I'm mistaken - I will try to dig up the thread.

Hi John,

I agree that Jens asked at the end of 2018 not to touch the fast path to 
fix this use-after-free (maybe that request has been repeated more 
recently). If Jens or anyone else feels strongly about not clearing 
hctx->tags->rqs[rq->tag] from the fast path then I will make that 
change. My motivation for clearing these pointers from the fast path is 
as follows:
- This results in code that is easier to read and easier to maintain.
- Every modern CPU pipelines store instructions so the performance 
impact of adding an additional store should be small.
- Since the block layer has a tendency to reuse tags that have been 
freed recently, it is likely that hctx->tags->rqs[rq->tag] will be used 
for a next request and hence that it will have to be loaded into the CPU 
cache anyway.

Bart.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-16 17:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-05 15:14 [RFC PATCH v3 0/3] blk-mq: Avoid use-after-free for accessing old requests John Garry
2021-03-05 15:14 ` [RFC PATCH v3 1/3] blk-mq: Clean up references to old requests when freeing rqs John Garry
2021-03-06  2:52   ` Khazhy Kumykov
2021-03-08 11:18     ` John Garry
2021-03-06 18:13   ` Bart Van Assche
2021-03-08 10:37     ` John Garry
2021-03-05 15:14 ` [RFC PATCH v3 2/3] blk-mq: Freeze and quiesce all queues for tagset in elevator_exit() John Garry
2021-03-06  4:32   ` Bart Van Assche
2021-03-08 10:50     ` John Garry
2021-03-08 19:35       ` Bart Van Assche
2021-03-10 15:57   ` Bart Van Assche
2021-03-11  0:58   ` Ming Lei
2021-03-11  8:21     ` John Garry
2021-03-12 23:05       ` Bart Van Assche
2021-03-16 16:15         ` John Garry
2021-03-16 17:00           ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2021-03-16 17:43             ` John Garry
2021-03-16 19:59               ` Bart Van Assche
2021-03-19 18:19                 ` John Garry
2021-03-19 18:32                   ` Bart Van Assche
2021-03-05 15:14 ` [RFC PATCH v3 3/3] blk-mq: Lockout tagset iterator when exiting elevator John Garry
2021-03-06  4:43   ` Bart Van Assche
2021-03-08 11:17     ` John Garry
2021-03-08 19:59       ` Bart Van Assche
2021-03-09 17:47         ` John Garry
2021-03-09 19:21           ` Bart Van Assche
2021-03-10  8:52             ` John Garry
2021-03-10 16:00               ` Bart Van Assche
2021-03-10 17:26                 ` John Garry
2021-03-18 10:26 ` [RFC PATCH v3 0/3] blk-mq: Avoid use-after-free for accessing old requests Shinichiro Kawasaki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fff92b15-d483-ad6a-bb01-ef61117b7cbd@acm.org \
    --to=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
    --cc=kashyap.desai@broadcom.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=pragalla@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=yuyufen@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).