From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
alim.akhtar@samsung.com, avri.altman@wdc.com,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: mark HPB support as BROKEN
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 11:35:40 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <yq135om1p3i.fsf@ca-mkp.ca.oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3f43feaa-5c3a-9e4c-ebc1-c982b0723e7e@kernel.dk> (Jens Axboe's message of "Wed, 27 Oct 2021 09:06:05 -0600")
Jens,
> But yes, reuse of the existing request is probably another potentially
> viable approach. My worry there is that inevitably you end up needing
> to stash a lot of data to restore the original, and we're certainly
> not adding anything to struct request for that.
Yeah, I much prefer the reserved tag approach. That was my original
recommendation.
SCSI error handling does command hijacking and it is absolutely
dreadful.
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-27 15:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-26 7:12 [PATCH] scsi: ufs: mark HPB support as BROKEN Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-26 7:18 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-10-26 7:24 ` Damien Le Moal
2021-10-26 13:04 ` James Bottomley
2021-10-26 16:36 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-10-26 17:19 ` James Bottomley
2021-10-26 17:25 ` Jens Axboe
2021-10-26 18:05 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-10-26 18:10 ` Jens Axboe
2021-10-26 18:18 ` James Bottomley
2021-10-26 18:27 ` Martin K. Petersen
2021-10-26 20:10 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-10-27 5:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-27 12:20 ` James Bottomley
2021-10-28 20:21 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-10-28 20:33 ` James Bottomley
2021-10-28 20:53 ` Bart Van Assche
[not found] ` <CGME20211028205342epcas2p40838e84438572adf052d106dc82e35ff@epcms2p6>
2021-10-28 21:14 ` Daejun Park
2021-10-27 13:16 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-10-27 14:12 ` Keith Busch
2021-10-27 14:38 ` Jens Axboe
2021-10-27 14:43 ` James Bottomley
2021-10-27 15:03 ` Ming Lei
2021-10-27 15:06 ` Jens Axboe
2021-10-27 15:16 ` Ming Lei
2021-10-27 15:44 ` Martin K. Petersen
2021-10-27 15:58 ` Ming Lei
2021-10-27 16:16 ` Keith Busch
2021-10-27 16:19 ` Jens Axboe
2021-10-28 0:42 ` Ming Lei
[not found] ` <CGME20211028004244epcas2p1f2212bf94ef861dfa6cd082c3cbb1803@epcms2p1>
2021-10-28 1:10 ` Daejun Park
2021-10-28 2:07 ` Ming Lei
2021-10-27 16:59 ` Martin K. Petersen
2021-10-27 15:35 ` Martin K. Petersen [this message]
2021-10-27 15:40 ` Jens Axboe
2021-10-27 16:16 ` Martin K. Petersen
2021-10-27 17:01 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-10-28 1:32 ` Ming Lei
[not found] ` <CGME20211026201057epcas2p4174ba542fd5abe7ec8f4469f8c60303a@epcms2p7>
2021-10-26 22:22 ` Daejun Park
2021-10-29 10:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-29 11:39 ` James Bottomley
2021-10-29 13:35 ` Avri Altman
2021-10-29 13:44 ` James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=yq135om1p3i.fsf@ca-mkp.ca.oracle.com \
--to=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=avri.altman@wdc.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).