From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
To: Jason Yan <yanaijie@huawei.com>
Cc: <axboe@kernel.dk>, <ming.lei@redhat.com>, <hch@lst.de>,
<keescook@chromium.org>, <kbusch@kernel.org>,
<linux-block@vger.kernel.org>, <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
<jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] scsi: check the whole result for reading write protect flag
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 22:50:07 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <yq1a6qskl3j.fsf@ca-mkp.ca.oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210319030128.1345061-2-yanaijie@huawei.com> (Jason Yan's message of "Fri, 19 Mar 2021 11:01:26 +0800")
Hi Jason!
> @@ -55,6 +55,19 @@ static inline int scsi_status_is_good(int status)
> (status == SAM_STAT_COMMAND_TERMINATED));
> }
>
> +/** scsi_result_is_good - check the result return.
> + *
> + * @result: the result passed up from the driver (including host and
> + * driver components)
> + *
> + * Drivers may only set other bytes but not status byte.
> + * This checks both the status byte and other bytes.
> + */
> +static inline int scsi_result_is_good(int result)
> +{
> + return scsi_status_is_good(result) && (result & ~0xff) == 0;
> +}
> +
>
> /*
> * standard mode-select header prepended to all mode-select commands
Instead of introducing a "don't be broken" variant of
scsi_status_is_good(), I'd prefer you to fix the latter to do the right
thing wrt. offline devices.
There aren't a ton of scsi_result_is_good() call sites to check. And I
suspect that most of them wouldn't actually consider the DID_NO_CONNECT
scenario to be "good".
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-25 2:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-19 3:01 [PATCH 0/3] scsi: check the whole result in some places Jason Yan
2021-03-19 3:01 ` [PATCH 1/3] scsi: check the whole result for reading write protect flag Jason Yan
2021-03-19 7:55 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-03-25 2:50 ` Martin K. Petersen [this message]
2021-03-27 6:57 ` Jason Yan
2021-03-19 3:01 ` [PATCH 2/3] scsi: only copy data to user when the whole result is good Jason Yan
2021-03-19 7:56 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-03-19 8:22 ` Jason Yan
2021-03-19 3:01 ` [PATCH 3/3] scsi: switch to use scsi_result_is_good() in scsi_result_to_blk_status() Jason Yan
2021-03-19 7:56 ` Hannes Reinecke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=yq1a6qskl3j.fsf@ca-mkp.ca.oracle.com \
--to=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=yanaijie@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).