From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Laurence Oberman <loberman@redhat.com>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
James Bottomley <james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
Don Brace <don.brace@microsemi.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
"linux-block\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
"linux-scsi\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>, Arun Easi <arun.easi@cavium.com>,
Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@broadcom.com>,
Peter Rivera <peter.rivera@broadcom.com>,
Meelis Roos <mroos@linux.ee>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/8] scsi: hpsa: fix selection of reply queue
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2018 14:24:25 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <yq1efkxqa6u.fsf@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180305020706.GC27111@ming.t460p> (Ming Lei's message of "Mon, 5 Mar 2018 10:07:07 +0800")
Ming,
> Given both Don and Laurence have verified that patch 1 and patch 2
> does fix IO hang, could you consider to merge the two first?
Oh, and I would still need a formal Acked-by: from Don and Tested-by:
from Laurence.
Also, for 4.16/scsi-fixes I would prefer verification to be done with
just patch 1/8 and none of the subsequent changes in place. Just to make
sure we're testing the right thing.
Thanks!
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-06 19:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-27 10:07 [PATCH V3 0/8] blk-mq & scsi: fix reply queue selection and improve host wide tagset Ming Lei
2018-02-27 10:07 ` [PATCH V3 1/8] scsi: hpsa: fix selection of reply queue Ming Lei
2018-03-01 16:18 ` Don Brace
2018-03-01 19:01 ` Laurence Oberman
2018-03-01 21:19 ` Laurence Oberman
2018-03-02 2:16 ` Ming Lei
2018-03-02 14:09 ` Laurence Oberman
2018-03-02 15:03 ` Don Brace
2018-03-02 21:53 ` Laurence Oberman
2018-03-05 2:07 ` Ming Lei
2018-03-06 17:55 ` Martin K. Petersen
2018-03-06 19:24 ` Martin K. Petersen [this message]
2018-03-07 0:00 ` Ming Lei
2018-03-07 3:14 ` Martin K. Petersen
2018-03-07 14:11 ` Laurence Oberman
2018-03-08 13:42 ` Ming Lei
2018-03-08 20:56 ` Laurence Oberman
2018-03-05 7:23 ` Kashyap Desai
2018-03-05 14:35 ` Don Brace
2018-03-05 15:19 ` Mike Snitzer
2018-03-02 0:47 ` Ming Lei
2018-03-08 7:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-03-08 8:15 ` Ming Lei
2018-03-08 8:41 ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-03-08 9:19 ` Ming Lei
2018-03-08 15:31 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-02-27 10:07 ` [PATCH V3 2/8] scsi: megaraid_sas: " Ming Lei
2018-02-27 10:07 ` [PATCH V3 3/8] blk-mq: introduce 'start_tag' field to 'struct blk_mq_tags' Ming Lei
2018-03-08 7:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-02-27 10:07 ` [PATCH V3 4/8] blk-mq: introduce BLK_MQ_F_HOST_TAGS Ming Lei
2018-03-08 7:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-03-08 9:35 ` Ming Lei
2018-02-27 10:07 ` [PATCH V3 5/8] scsi: Add template flag 'host_tagset' Ming Lei
2018-02-27 10:07 ` [PATCH V3 6/8] block: null_blk: introduce module parameter of 'g_host_tags' Ming Lei
2018-02-27 10:07 ` [PATCH V3 7/8] scsi: hpsa: improve scsi_mq performance via .host_tagset Ming Lei
2018-03-08 7:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-03-08 10:59 ` Ming Lei
2018-02-27 10:07 ` [PATCH V3 8/8] scsi: megaraid: " Ming Lei
2018-02-28 14:58 ` Kashyap Desai
2018-02-28 15:21 ` Ming Lei
2018-02-28 16:22 ` Laurence Oberman
2018-03-01 5:24 ` Kashyap Desai
2018-03-01 7:58 ` Ming Lei
2018-03-07 5:27 ` Ming Lei
2018-03-07 15:01 ` Kashyap Desai
2018-03-07 16:05 ` Ming Lei
2018-03-07 17:28 ` Kashyap Desai
2018-03-08 1:15 ` Ming Lei
2018-03-08 10:04 ` Kashyap Desai
2018-03-08 11:06 ` Ming Lei
2018-03-08 11:23 ` Ming Lei
2018-03-09 6:56 ` Kashyap Desai
2018-03-09 8:13 ` Ming Lei
2018-03-01 21:46 ` [PATCH V3 0/8] blk-mq & scsi: fix reply queue selection and improve host wide tagset Laurence Oberman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=yq1efkxqa6u.fsf@oracle.com \
--to=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=arun.easi@cavium.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=don.brace@microsemi.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=kashyap.desai@broadcom.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=loberman@redhat.com \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=mroos@linux.ee \
--cc=osandov@fb.com \
--cc=peter.rivera@broadcom.com \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).