Hi,

On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 09:01:11AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Sebastian Reichel <sre@kernel.org> [191020 20:34]:
> > On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 07:31:16AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > * Sebastian Reichel <sre@kernel.org> [191003 06:42]:
> > > > This moves the remaining users of btwilink to the "new" serdev based hci_ll
> > > > driver and drops the btwilink driver afterwards. The patches were only compile
> > > > tested by me, but Enric tested the IGEP platform and Adam will test the LogicPD
> > > > platform.
> > > > 
> > > > I kept the TI_ST driver for now, since I plan to send a second patchset for the
> > > > FM radio driver. Once the FM driver has been converted to also use hci_ll, we
> > > > can remove TI_ST completly.
> > > > 
> > > > My suggestion is for the patch handling is, that everything simply goes through
> > > > Tony's tree.
> > > 
> > > Sounds good to me, good to see kim gone with patch 3/4 :)
> > > 
> > > Marcel, care to ack the old driver removal patch?
> > 
> > Looks like Marcel missed the extra messages and merged the 4th
> > patch, so I guess you can just merge patches 1-3. Technically that
> > might lead to temporarily missing BT support on those two devices
> > when the BT tree is merged before ARM tree during the merge window.
> > Not a big issue I guess.
> 
> Sure no problem. Applying dts changes into omap-for-v5.5/dt
> and the pdata quirk removal to omap-for-v5.5/soc.

Thanks.

> I guess ti_wilink_st.h will need some follow-up patch to
> remove unused platform data, but best to wait on that.

The header will receive a cleanup in the patchset moving the FM
driver from TI_ST to serdev based bluetooth driver. After that
patchset most of the ti_wilink_st.h content can be removed.

-- Sebastian