From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CABB3C433DF for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 20:43:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A85392075B for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 20:43:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1591303428; bh=v7d0ty4zgWvBTr+3hwbL3wZMvdeMKI1Lx6Mt6skwufE=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=s2RWc5nGjya1KtFkitz7YA6pbie+HVLria1tsdps2QblGGtx1ylD515/U+nZu2/ih I2faTc8rhDilItDX80FEQtxAveEaLtDgUeUCbt0xbSmGz0BcC1ktjQ3dBqFEJIPrC7 nKPaAITNidi3PAj5DwB3rTFCgL02ZWu4WsBINNFI= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730022AbgFDUns (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Jun 2020 16:43:48 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:40116 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729816AbgFDUnr (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Jun 2020 16:43:47 -0400 Received: from pali.im (pali.im [31.31.79.79]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 649CD206E6; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 20:43:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1591303426; bh=v7d0ty4zgWvBTr+3hwbL3wZMvdeMKI1Lx6Mt6skwufE=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=k1jmYxvvTYfv8jmdayh4Ysmz9PpN8sXxR68CK+xzhiay3x+fkJhum4YPIphkG0ksq tfPZtQiT2uy6x0ajUsl2DDXa7qTHoTbY7wmqVfy2eTmqPBQh1MreXLmwtfkQ31JOEG Q6qP2/A9s4AqjzubBUFxt9lXP3TFpRIW1ZHygbMg= Received: by pali.im (Postfix) id 191E9F88; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 22:43:44 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2020 22:43:43 +0200 From: Pali =?utf-8?B?Um9ow6Fy?= To: Luiz Augusto von Dentz , Ujjwal Sharma , Andrew Fuller , Aleksandar Kostadinov , David Heidelberg , Marcel Holtmann , Johan Hedberg , "linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org" , Pavel Machek , usharma@chromium.org Subject: Re: Bluetooth: Allow to use configure SCO socket codec parameters Message-ID: <20200604204343.eor47oe3fbzf6rbv@pali> References: <20200419234937.4zozkqgpt557m3o6@pali> <177c5794-1cd7-8f76-b66f-e9473ed37a31@redhat.com> <20200516075340.3z37ejs3fuhctunl@pali> <20200518165011.jfarrp5mtqoy3mqz@pali> <6da08b42-34d5-9d20-bfc1-161cc8d0f2ea@igalia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 Sender: linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 27 May 2020 21:54:18 Ujjwal Sharma wrote: > Hi Luiz! > > Thanks for your response. > > On 5/27/20 9:18 PM, Luiz Augusto von Dentz wrote: > > Hi Ujjwal, > > ... > > Testing is one thing but for production we would need a qualifyable > > solution, that said I wouldn't oppose to have the socket option behind > > a module options (runtime) or Kconfig (build-time) so people willing > > to run this code can do on their own. > > 1. What do you think is lacking in this solution that would make it > qualifyable for production? I believe there are multiple people in this > thread including Pali who are willing to put in the extra effort. > > 2. I'd be happy with a runtime option which would allow me to test this > as well. Have I missed something? setsockopt() solution which I described in <20200419234937.4zozkqgpt557m3o6@pali> email is already runtime option.