From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55103C4320A for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 12:25:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39B6260C3F for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 12:25:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234328AbhG2MY6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jul 2021 08:24:58 -0400 Received: from smtp-relay-canonical-1.canonical.com ([185.125.188.121]:54412 "EHLO smtp-relay-canonical-1.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231674AbhG2MYz (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jul 2021 08:24:55 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.18] (unknown [222.129.38.241]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-relay-canonical-1.canonical.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BC0953F079; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 12:24:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=canonical.com; s=20210705; t=1627561490; bh=+FXY2wcHq76jBObAXyKLbqyvrnML5nfK/kXk9WmeV+k=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=HwSvs3V5bC+WQ7a8ZWzSd+PslPpPWSroGLKnRIG3gLKc/SB4Itx0x7pnDIn3VuXn/ tOJXGuqEryoPuS8j8ei5gK1HuIiGsztRDsShM6Y1ucWoRJij5ywNJLVEHpOK/rvI9y OuGIzHV92dj2uLW2/qcd03wWmgEE0NF+tTRFSGeRSdrssXKW2KKBfimzTHN9Js7Cyl jmqm1z/dzZdxQPkhVVzuKyTa0/tjJWNOaHt14FXiQfL+Teol/5Hcw9dlCIdxl2Am3m nOwZ+nMG9ZxH5SMjkCcrWNFIrjkGn6zCJlR+SsG0TGl651m81+SJhJJ7qpKBilxpiN Vu/D1RZ7VuF6A== Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Bluetooth: btusb: Add support for Foxconn Mediatek Chip To: Marcel Holtmann Cc: Johan Hedberg , Luiz Augusto von Dentz , matthias.bgg@gmail.com, linux-bluetooth , open list , linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org References: <20210722171718.134034-1-aaron.ma@canonical.com> <117CE889-33B8-4D1D-A81F-AC2AC9A0371D@holtmann.org> From: Aaron Ma Message-ID: <333d6607-a364-8f3d-be6b-1bb12c64815c@canonical.com> Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 20:24:34 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <117CE889-33B8-4D1D-A81F-AC2AC9A0371D@holtmann.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org Hi Marcel: On 7/29/21 7:48 PM, Marcel Holtmann wrote: > I can’t apply this cleanly to bluetooth-next tree. Please rebase it. > You have already applied in bluetooth-next branch master. Aaron > Regards > > Marcel >