linux-bluetooth.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Sönke Huster" <soenke.huster@eknoes.de>
To: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>,
	Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@gmail.com>,
	Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@gmail.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Bluetooth: hci_event: Ignore multiple conn complete events
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2022 19:22:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4f3d6dcf-c142-9a99-df97-6190c8f2abc9@eknoes.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220121173622.192744-1-soenke.huster@eknoes.de>

I just noticed that just checking for handle does not work, as obviously 0x0 could also be a handle value and therefore it can't be distinguished, whether it is not set yet or it is 0x0.

On 21.01.22 18:36, Soenke Huster wrote:
> When a HCI_CONNECTION_COMPLETE event is received multiple times
> for the same handle, the device is registered multiple times which leads
> to memory corruptions. Therefore, consequent events for a single
> connection are ignored.
> 
> The conn->state can hold different values so conn->handle is
> checked to detect whether a connection is already set up.
> 
> Buglink: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215497
> Signed-off-by: Soenke Huster <soenke.huster@eknoes.de>
> ---
> This fixes the referenced bug and several use-after-free issues I discovered.
> I tagged it as RFC, as I am not 100% sure if checking the existence of the
> handle is the correct approach, but to the best of my knowledge it must be
> set for the first time in this function for valid connections of this event,
> therefore it should be fine.
> 
> net/bluetooth/hci_event.c | 11 +++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
> index 681c623aa380..71ccb12c928d 100644
> --- a/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
> +++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
> @@ -3106,6 +3106,17 @@ static void hci_conn_complete_evt(struct hci_dev *hdev, void *data,
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> +	/* The HCI_Connection_Complete event is only sent once per connection.
> +	 * Processing it more than once per connection can corrupt kernel memory.
> +	 *
> +	 * As the connection handle is set here for the first time, it indicates
> +	 * whether the connection is already set up.
> +	 */
> +	if (conn->handle) {
> +		bt_dev_err(hdev, "Ignoring HCI_Connection_Complete for existing connection");
> +		goto unlock;
> +	}
> +
>  	if (!ev->status) {
>  		conn->handle = __le16_to_cpu(ev->handle);
>  

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-01-21 18:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-21 17:36 [RFC PATCH] Bluetooth: hci_event: Ignore multiple conn complete events Soenke Huster
2022-01-21 18:04 ` [RFC] " bluez.test.bot
2022-01-21 18:22 ` Sönke Huster [this message]
2022-01-21 21:31   ` [RFC PATCH] " Luiz Augusto von Dentz
2022-01-21 23:18     ` Sönke Huster
2022-01-21 23:32       ` Luiz Augusto von Dentz
2022-01-21 23:52         ` Sönke Huster
2022-01-22  0:06           ` Luiz Augusto von Dentz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4f3d6dcf-c142-9a99-df97-6190c8f2abc9@eknoes.de \
    --to=soenke.huster@eknoes.de \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=johan.hedberg@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luiz.dentz@gmail.com \
    --cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).