This is automated email and please do not reply to this email!

Dear submitter,

Thank you for submitting the patches to the linux bluetooth mailing list.
This is a CI test results with your patch series:
PW Link:https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bluetooth/list/?series=651579

---Test result---

Test Summary:
CheckPatch                    FAIL      15.85 seconds
GitLint                       PASS      8.46 seconds
Prep - Setup ELL              PASS      54.02 seconds
Build - Prep                  PASS      0.89 seconds
Build - Configure             PASS      10.59 seconds
Build - Make                  PASS      1819.04 seconds
Make Check                    PASS      12.78 seconds
Make Check w/Valgrind         PASS      557.04 seconds
Make Distcheck                PASS      294.41 seconds
Build w/ext ELL - Configure   PASS      10.74 seconds
Build w/ext ELL - Make        PASS      1814.82 seconds
Incremental Build with patchesPASS      14733.34 seconds

Details
##############################
Test: CheckPatch - FAIL
Desc: Run checkpatch.pl script with rule in .checkpatch.conf
Output:
[BlueZ,v6,7/8] tools: Add isotest tool
WARNING:PREFER_FALLTHROUGH: Prefer 'fallthrough;' over fallthrough comment
#1222: FILE: tools/isotest.c:1106:
+		/* fall through */

/github/workspace/src/12886070.patch total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 1219 lines checked

NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to
      mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace.

/github/workspace/src/12886070.patch has style problems, please review.

NOTE: Ignored message types: COMMIT_MESSAGE COMPLEX_MACRO CONST_STRUCT FILE_PATH_CHANGES MISSING_SIGN_OFF PREFER_PACKED SPDX_LICENSE_TAG SPLIT_STRING SSCANF_TO_KSTRTO

NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report
      them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.




---
Regards,
Linux Bluetooth