[PATCH] net: bluetooth: hci_sock: Fix a possible null-pointer dereference in hci_mgmt_cmd()

[PATCH] net: bluetooth: hci_sock: Fix a possible null-pointer dereference in hci_mgmt_cmd()

[Jia-Ju Bai]

In hci_mgmt_cmd(), there is an if statement on line 1570 to check
whether hdev is NULL:
    if (hdev && chan->hdev_init)

When hdev is NULL, it is used on line 1575:
    err = handler->func(sk, hdev, cp, len);

Some called functions of handler->func use hdev, such as:
set_appearance(), add_device() and remove_device() in mgmt.c.

Thus, a possible null-pointer dereference may occur.

To fix this bug, hdev is checked before calling handler->func().

This bug is found by a static analysis tool STCheck written by us.

Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
---
 net/bluetooth/hci_sock.c | 11 ++++++-----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_sock.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_sock.c
index d32077b28433..18ea1e47ea48 100644
--- a/net/bluetooth/hci_sock.c
+++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_sock.c
@@ -1570,11 +1570,12 @@ static int hci_mgmt_cmd(struct hci_mgmt_chan *chan, struct sock *sk,
 	if (hdev && chan->hdev_init)
 		chan->hdev_init(sk, hdev);
 
-	cp = buf + sizeof(*hdr);
-
-	err = handler->func(sk, hdev, cp, len);
-	if (err < 0)
-		goto done;
+	if (hdev) {
+		cp = buf + sizeof(*hdr);
+		err = handler->func(sk, hdev, cp, len);
+		if (err < 0)
+			goto done;
+	}
 
 	err = msglen;
 
-- 
2.17.0

Re: [PATCH] net: bluetooth: hci_sock: Fix a possible null-pointer dereference in hci_mgmt_cmd()

[Marcel Holtmann]

Hi Jia-Ju,

> In hci_mgmt_cmd(), there is an if statement on line 1570 to check
> whether hdev is NULL:
>    if (hdev && chan->hdev_init)
> 
> When hdev is NULL, it is used on line 1575:
>    err = handler->func(sk, hdev, cp, len);
> 
> Some called functions of handler->func use hdev, such as:
> set_appearance(), add_device() and remove_device() in mgmt.c.
> 
> Thus, a possible null-pointer dereference may occur.
> 
> To fix this bug, hdev is checked before calling handler->func().
> 
> This bug is found by a static analysis tool STCheck written by us.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
> ---
> net/bluetooth/hci_sock.c | 11 ++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_sock.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_sock.c
> index d32077b28433..18ea1e47ea48 100644
> --- a/net/bluetooth/hci_sock.c
> +++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_sock.c
> @@ -1570,11 +1570,12 @@ static int hci_mgmt_cmd(struct hci_mgmt_chan *chan, struct sock *sk,
> 	if (hdev && chan->hdev_init)
> 		chan->hdev_init(sk, hdev);
> 
> -	cp = buf + sizeof(*hdr);
> -
> -	err = handler->func(sk, hdev, cp, len);
> -	if (err < 0)
> -		goto done;
> +	if (hdev) {
> +		cp = buf + sizeof(*hdr);
> +		err = handler->func(sk, hdev, cp, len);
> +		if (err < 0)
> +			goto done;
> +	}
> 
> 	err = msglen;

have you evaluated the statement above:

        no_hdev = (handler->flags & HCI_MGMT_NO_HDEV);                           
        if (no_hdev != !hdev) {                                                  
                err = mgmt_cmd_status(sk, index, opcode,                         
                                      MGMT_STATUS_INVALID_INDEX);                
                goto done;                                                       
        }

I think that code is just overly complex and can be simplified, but I doubt you get to the situation where hdev is NULL for any function that requires it. Only the handler->func marked with HCI_MGMT_NO_HDEV will get hdev == NULL and these are not using it.

So we might can make this easier code to really check the index != MGMT_INDEX_NONE check above to cover all cases to ensure that hdev is either valid or set to NULL before proceeding any further.

And since we have a full set of unit tests in tools/mgmt-tester, I assume we would have had a chance to catch an issue like this. But we can add a test case to it to explicitly call the functions with either MGMT_INDEX_NONE used or not.

Regards

Marcel