From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 883ECC2B9F4 for ; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 20:33:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5172861969 for ; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 20:33:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229776AbhFYUf6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jun 2021 16:35:58 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53976 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229629AbhFYUf5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jun 2021 16:35:57 -0400 Received: from mail-yb1-xb2b.google.com (mail-yb1-xb2b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b2b]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68DEEC061574 for ; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 13:33:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-yb1-xb2b.google.com with SMTP id t8so6547937ybt.10 for ; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 13:33:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=/fGkK1JlKkNHp7k8PKQamfzB/GU60+BlwTdAJV/LyG8=; b=q4VsIRAODc/7c56XT8lDWgVi7f0nUX2LGSIrzlVmb/Do5YZ9jnNCHWK3aQkN2akXFQ uF/7ChUtugdwhSDUUr31EieKutZpDk2KmCkdg6umaBSC8IKztOggeCmlGv+GdBFySoPr eVZK25EBsCiNuKUqQH4CpIJzfADXRVUR7JNY2MqOjw5rblIM3kqXKR/QhY2PJU/6kl9t HXjLLGWcLzHG/T8rbh94d2ROSKk555nNgnY0jlx/figTiyji5BBesF+eTo+CYQAfKHOP ADacxKYOOJ4/+N2/+/XhAUSVdj3lGVA+jYX16bHdoXc21n3f+qI2tmayXCjS8vyNVhaH apOg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=/fGkK1JlKkNHp7k8PKQamfzB/GU60+BlwTdAJV/LyG8=; b=r0fl6/eDxJIy/gU/PyZtSLAVIUhH4xKzHl6XpmmZH2dNp3MYqzOPw7ZRsS9/v/Ho4U FT1FD4hgJSw9EjbEPSJTqd0k8+1jWkjH2o/xf0399LMThkvCVeausPznJSaUlrIzyrUg J8pDuLmcuTIeNmIaPaoQcbq2n6oVLrbUQh8vMCFwMcyk1uyfzXlZNjik1ysuUaogLsWl Rx24xibMuj/q4FquzNTME6H3CbhRNrUAVBtr5oGWDP4I1tsY66lSyLc+JWi1pB5CFFL5 ZmCEt1ogmRFtyTTykdOSaC0upTh3LK4RbSo4JcplPr439YlnC/36v53DJAMLvmFZ8zH0 Fmuw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530I6XU7OX5w2lqHydg7rDyvgREWp7/XD3d8AiiSjC9mq3tg8H25 cmL4jx9QUdowhka7fQNNJ7sEgwblk0MnNTB+JpM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyTPPh9/XQA5nwDEMLSyMuxEbXTDv2omXzLR7dubQa7daJf26q50SlnH16yYJbTWEKtv5CyWGg0p7IxvSpLwOI= X-Received: by 2002:a25:acdf:: with SMTP id x31mr15468114ybd.222.1624653213943; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 13:33:33 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <60d60196.1c69fb81.dc5c5.0cf5@mx.google.com> <20210625195924.GM1983@kadam> In-Reply-To: <20210625195924.GM1983@kadam> From: Luiz Augusto von Dentz Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2021 13:33:23 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Bluetooth: sco: prevent information leak in sco_conn_defer_accept() To: Dan Carpenter Cc: "linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org" , "An, Tedd" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org Hi Dan, On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 1:02 PM Dan Carpenter wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 09:17:26AM -0700, bluez.test.bot@gmail.com wrote: > > ############################## > > Test: CheckPatch - FAIL - 0.59 seconds > > Run checkpatch.pl script with rule in .checkpatch.conf > > Bluetooth: sco: prevent information leak in sco_conn_defer_accept() > > WARNING: Unknown commit id '2f69a82acf6f', maybe rebased or not pulled? > > I double checked the commit and it's correct. It's from 2013 so it's > not clear how the bot got confused. Yep, Ive seen this before with my own patches, perhaps there is something with the CI tree which prevents checkpatch to locate the commit id or something like that, @An, Tedd please have a look at CI environment what could be causing this problem. -- Luiz Augusto von Dentz