From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BF00C43334 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2022 07:01:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229595AbiFXHBz (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jun 2022 03:01:55 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36318 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229488AbiFXHBz (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jun 2022 03:01:55 -0400 Received: from mx1.molgen.mpg.de (mx3.molgen.mpg.de [141.14.17.11]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC55D69270 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2022 00:01:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (ip5f5aeb79.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de [95.90.235.121]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pmenzel) by mx.molgen.mpg.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5E7F461EA1928; Fri, 24 Jun 2022 09:01:52 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2022 09:01:52 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.10.0 Subject: Re: third time Content-Language: en-US To: Thomas Green References: Cc: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org From: Paul Menzel In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org Dear Thomas, Am 23.06.22 um 22:00 schrieb Thomas Green: > I've updated (at least my testing system) to version 5.64 and are > having other problems now too. For example the first time I attach > one of these devices it works well, subsequent attempts to pair other > of the same type of device fails with and AuthenticationFailed error. > On 5.50, I could pair as many of these devices as I wanted. Should > we take this offline and perhaps we could discuss this more? Can you please (git) bisect the issue? It’s often the fastest way to find the cause, and then figuring out a fix. Kind regards, Paul