From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C540C433F5 for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 18:35:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E3B260E98 for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 18:35:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230023AbhJKSh5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Oct 2021 14:37:57 -0400 Received: from smtp-17.italiaonline.it ([213.209.10.17]:50375 "EHLO libero.it" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229542AbhJKSh4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Oct 2021 14:37:56 -0400 Received: from venice.bhome ([78.12.10.152]) by smtp-17.iol.local with ESMTPA id a09RmP1azUpwUa09Rm5FJ8; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 20:35:54 +0200 x-libjamoibt: 1601 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=libero.it; s=s2021; t=1633977354; bh=JqQItFeAvquFgBBxW1CT5ClbXiGzO8sJL2dCMBTnA+M=; h=From; b=A7FcOS3xrbI3j2Y+jxWB0mPcB2In+gbDoNswJERSQ/NNx+YL6OLa5tBHO3URpcKSe iDC+WDc95HV/xAv6lG6/wy3i2QFU8GQF6+taWlAQT88P1hTSsEjr/coOofL5Ik6UJE pPa+SEH+8sne53wn2AiReFtKsMnVYr3cMbZj0NeLNE9eoZdLvcVpRmNb7yypTsFNAt mK3Gw2X4osTS2lvrK7FTaUblANKauk06LdbWz6rd+tbJDG4pQtCJQnNBWFk0C3gUUn sFGqOgEhzVww0YM0oHAnQPdFFDD2KoTVYkdQiNiko8HPiZ5CaJTNo1NgialXYsc05X ugnkx+ihQUd0A== X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=MJylJOVl c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=6164840a cx=a_exe a=EzK6Ev+Ndi4VoAiPDBu8Fw==:117 a=EzK6Ev+Ndi4VoAiPDBu8Fw==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=lBieLZBSNK-9T2mtmN0A:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 Reply-To: kreijack@inwind.it Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] btrfs-progs: mkfs fixes and prep work for extent tree v2 To: dsterba@suse.cz, Josef Bacik References: <20210825135839.GK3379@twin.jikos.cz> Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com From: Goffredo Baroncelli Message-ID: <03ae7a36-dbc9-bfad-6ec7-45e929f862a7@libero.it> Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 20:35:53 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210825135839.GK3379@twin.jikos.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4xfJyZk9Cn/er3o/nmv5hpj6dGmXy9+Gy1TssHegMofLi4h9ZStnTMfxleUMsJf8tPkYla3cie23Q6Zs7JhAt+HnmV4Wenf82FWOY0DlzMb6rczRoNzbe2 Kejc7zj3LC2QWtozRRNy6lr7tMKrmzBQ+abLTPgbsn+j9yAF5BDhz6ImnaVc3rIBZ2YRicrtf+Z6y+A7byD0fkn4A/8oVIQLQRcyw/GIUcrOTKWvCYh2A9E2 kYpGdAE83plkkECb0s/GIViMYxCJuDvnzdG8qNmG9CM= Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org On 8/25/21 3:58 PM, David Sterba wrote: > On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 04:14:45PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote: [...] > Even with the "if (EXTENT_TREE_V2)" in place it becomes the > implementation and given that I haven't read the whole design doc for > that I'm worried that once I find time for that and would suggest some > changes the reply would be "no I did it this way, it's implemented, > would require too many changes". Just for curiosity, is there anywhere a design doc for extent tree v2 ? BR -- gpg @keyserver.linux.it: Goffredo Baroncelli Key fingerprint BBF5 1610 0B64 DAC6 5F7D 17B2 0EDA 9B37 8B82 E0B5