From: "Su Yanjun <suyj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>" <suyj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>,
Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>, <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/13] btrfs-progs: check: Delete file extent item with unaligned extent backref
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2018 15:04:18 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <05530906-9f07-0f36-baa5-ccbef423c632@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e2113bf4-b888-2d6f-0a7b-f0c734d63172@gmx.com>
On 11/7/2018 2:38 PM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
> On 2018/11/7 下午2:21, Su Yanjun <suyj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 10/24/2018 8:45 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>>> On 2018/10/23 下午5:41, Su Yue wrote:
>>>> From: Su Yanjun <suyj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
>>>>
>>>> In original mode, if some file extent item has unaligned extent backref,
>>>> fixup_extent_refs can't repair it. This patch will check extent
>>>> alignment
>>>> then delete file extent with unaligned extent backref.
>>> This looks a little strange to me.
>>>
>>> You mean, an unaligned FILE EXTENT has an unaligned EXTENT_ITEM?
>>>
>>> Then why not just delete the EXTENT_ITEM directly? No need to go back
>>> checking if it has a corresponding EXTENT_DATA since unaligned one is
>>> definitely corrupted.
>>>
>>> For corrupted EXTENT_DATA, it should get deleted when we check fs tree.
>>>
>>> This would save you a lot of codes.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Qu
>> The situation is that the file extent has wrong extent backref, actually
>> it doesn't exist.
> Did you mean extent EXTENT_ITEM key's objectid is unaligned?
>
> Would you please give an example on this case? Like:
> (<ino> EXTENT_DATA <offset>
> disk bytenr <XXXX> disk len <YYYY>
>
> And its backref like:
> (<XXXX> EXTENT_ITEM <YYYY>)
>
> And then mark where the number is incorrect.
>
> Thanks,
> Qu
As in /btrfs-progs/tests/fsck-tests/001-bad-file-extent-bytenr case:
item 7 key (257 EXTENT_DATA 0) itemoff 3453 itemsize 53
generation 6 type 1 (regular)
extent data disk byte 755944791 nr 1048576
^^^^^^^^^
extent data offset 0 nr 1048576 ram 1048576
extent compression 0 (none)
Thanks,
Su
>> Thanks,
>> Su
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-07 7:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-23 9:41 [PATCH 00/13] btrfs-progs: fixes of file extent in original and lowmem check Su Yue
2018-10-23 9:41 ` [PATCH 01/13] btrfs-progs: lowmem: add argument path to punch_extent_hole() Su Yue
2018-10-23 10:04 ` Qu Wenruo
2018-10-24 1:18 ` Su Yue
2018-12-02 14:34 ` [PATCH v2 " damenly.su
2018-10-23 9:41 ` [PATCH 02/13] btrfs-progs: lowmem: move nbytes check before isize check Su Yue
2018-10-23 10:07 ` Qu Wenruo
2018-12-02 14:38 ` [PATCH v2 " damenly.su
2018-10-23 9:41 ` [PATCH 03/13] btrfs-progs: lowmem: fix false alert if extent item has been repaired Su Yue
2018-10-23 10:30 ` Qu Wenruo
2018-10-24 1:27 ` Su Yue
2018-10-24 1:24 ` Qu Wenruo
2018-12-02 14:45 ` [PATCH v2 " damenly.su
2018-10-23 9:41 ` [PATCH 04/13] btrfs-progs: lowmem: fix false alert about the existence of gaps in the check_file_extent Su Yue
2018-10-24 0:13 ` Qu Wenruo
2018-10-23 9:41 ` [PATCH 05/13] btrfs-progs: lowmem: check unaligned disk_bytenr for extent_data Su Yue
2018-10-24 0:13 ` Qu Wenruo
2018-10-23 9:41 ` [PATCH 06/13] btrfs-progs: lowmem: rename delete_extent_tree_item() to delete_item() Su Yue
2018-10-24 0:15 ` Qu Wenruo
2018-10-23 9:41 ` [PATCH 07/13] btrfs-progs: lowmem: delete unaligned bytes extent data under repair Su Yue
2018-10-24 0:16 ` Qu Wenruo
2018-10-23 9:41 ` [PATCH 08/13] btrfs-progs: Revert "btrfs-progs: Add repair and report function for orphan file extent." Su Yue
2018-10-24 0:28 ` Qu Wenruo
2018-10-23 9:41 ` [PATCH 09/13] btrfs-progs: Revert "btrfs-progs: Record orphan data extent ref to corresponding root." Su Yue
2018-10-24 0:29 ` Qu Wenruo
2018-11-07 9:09 ` Su Yanjun <suyj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
2018-11-07 9:14 ` Qu Wenruo
2018-10-23 9:41 ` [PATCH 10/13] btrfs-progs: check: fix bug in find_possible_backrefs Su Yue
2018-10-24 0:34 ` Qu Wenruo
2018-11-07 6:28 ` Su Yanjun <suyj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
2018-11-07 6:40 ` Qu Wenruo
2018-10-23 9:41 ` [PATCH 11/13] btrfs-progs: check: Delete file extent item with unaligned extent backref Su Yue
2018-10-24 0:45 ` Qu Wenruo
2018-11-07 6:21 ` Su Yanjun <suyj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
2018-11-07 6:38 ` Qu Wenruo
2018-11-07 7:04 ` Su Yanjun <suyj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> [this message]
2018-11-07 7:13 ` Qu Wenruo
2018-10-23 9:41 ` [PATCH 12/13] btrfs-progs: tests: add case for inode lose one file extent Su Yue
2018-10-23 9:41 ` [PATCH 13/13] btrfs-progs: fsck-test: enable lowmem repair for case 001 Su Yue
2018-10-23 9:45 ` [PATCH 00/13] btrfs-progs: fixes of file extent in original and lowmem check Qu Wenruo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=05530906-9f07-0f36-baa5-ccbef423c632@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=suyj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
--cc=suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).