linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
To: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] btrfs-progs: btrfs_add_to_fsid: check if adding device would overflow
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 09:50:28 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0727646f-e356-2d41-5745-6fd01a2fb331@gmx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190814010402.22546-2-jeffm@suse.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 13054 bytes --]



On 2019/8/14 上午9:03, Jeff Mahoney wrote:
> It's theoretically possible to add multiple devices with sizes that add up
> to or exceed 16EiB.  A file system will be created successfully but will
> have a superblock with incorrect values for total_bytes and other fields.
> 
> Kernels up to v5.0 will crash when they encounter this scenario.
> 
> We need to check for overflow and reject the device if it would overflow.
> I've copied include/linux/overflow.h from the kernel to reuse that code.

That would be a pretty good base for later overflow check.

> 
> Link: https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1099147
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>

Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>

Thanks,
Qu

> ---
>  common/device-scan.c                              |  15 +-
>  kernel-lib/overflow.h                             | 270 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  tests/mkfs-tests/018-multidevice-overflow/test.sh |  22 ++
>  3 files changed, 304 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 kernel-lib/overflow.h
>  create mode 100755 tests/mkfs-tests/018-multidevice-overflow/test.sh
> 
> diff --git a/common/device-scan.c b/common/device-scan.c
> index 2c5ae225..09d90add 100644
> --- a/common/device-scan.c
> +++ b/common/device-scan.c
> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
>  #include <linux/limits.h>
>  #include <blkid/blkid.h>
>  #include <uuid/uuid.h>
> +#include "kernel-lib/overflow.h"
>  #include "common/path-utils.h"
>  #include "common/device-scan.h"
>  #include "common/messages.h"
> @@ -118,7 +119,8 @@ int btrfs_add_to_fsid(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
>  	struct btrfs_device *device;
>  	struct btrfs_dev_item *dev_item;
>  	char *buf = NULL;
> -	u64 fs_total_bytes;
> +	u64 old_size = btrfs_super_total_bytes(super);
> +	u64 new_size;
>  	u64 num_devs;
>  	int ret;
>  
> @@ -156,13 +158,20 @@ int btrfs_add_to_fsid(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
>  		goto out;
>  	}
>  
> +	if (check_add_overflow(old_size, device_total_bytes, &new_size)) {
> +		error(
> +"adding device of %llu bytes would exceed max file system size.",
> +		      device->total_bytes);
> +		ret = -EOVERFLOW;
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&device->dev_list);
>  	ret = btrfs_add_device(trans, fs_info, device);
>  	if (ret)
>  		goto out;
>  
> -	fs_total_bytes = btrfs_super_total_bytes(super) + device_total_bytes;
> -	btrfs_set_super_total_bytes(super, fs_total_bytes);
> +	btrfs_set_super_total_bytes(super, new_size);
>  
>  	num_devs = btrfs_super_num_devices(super) + 1;
>  	btrfs_set_super_num_devices(super, num_devs);
> diff --git a/kernel-lib/overflow.h b/kernel-lib/overflow.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000..ab7f5d0e
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/kernel-lib/overflow.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,270 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 OR MIT */
> +#ifndef __LINUX_OVERFLOW_H
> +#define __LINUX_OVERFLOW_H
> +
> +/*
> + * It would seem more obvious to do something like
> + *
> + * #define type_min(T) (T)(is_signed_type(T) ? (T)1 << (8*sizeof(T)-1) : 0)
> + * #define type_max(T) (T)(is_signed_type(T) ? ((T)1 << (8*sizeof(T)-1)) - 1 : ~(T)0)
> + *
> + * Unfortunately, the middle expressions, strictly speaking, have
> + * undefined behaviour, and at least some versions of gcc warn about
> + * the type_max expression (but not if -fsanitize=undefined is in
> + * effect; in that case, the warning is deferred to runtime...).
> + *
> + * The slightly excessive casting in type_min is to make sure the
> + * macros also produce sensible values for the exotic type _Bool. [The
> + * overflow checkers only almost work for _Bool, but that's
> + * a-feature-not-a-bug, since people shouldn't be doing arithmetic on
> + * _Bools. Besides, the gcc builtins don't allow _Bool* as third
> + * argument.]
> + *
> + * Idea stolen from
> + * https://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-misc/2007/02/05/0000.html -
> + * credit to Christian Biere.
> + */
> +#define is_signed_type(type)       (((type)(-1)) < (type)1)
> +#define __type_half_max(type) ((type)1 << (8*sizeof(type) - 1 - is_signed_type(type)))
> +#define type_max(T) ((T)((__type_half_max(T) - 1) + __type_half_max(T)))
> +#define type_min(T) ((T)((T)-type_max(T)-(T)1))
> +
> +/*
> + * Avoids triggering -Wtype-limits compilation warning,
> + * while using unsigned data types to check a < 0.
> + */
> +#define is_non_negative(a) ((a) > 0 || (a) == 0)
> +#define is_negative(a) (!(is_non_negative(a)))
> +
> +/* Checking for unsigned overflow is relatively easy without causing UB. */
> +#define __unsigned_add_overflow(a, b, d) ({	\
> +	typeof(a) __a = (a);			\
> +	typeof(b) __b = (b);			\
> +	typeof(d) __d = (d);			\
> +	(void) (&__a == &__b);			\
> +	(void) (&__a == __d);			\
> +	*__d = __a + __b;			\
> +	*__d < __a;				\
> +})
> +#define __unsigned_sub_overflow(a, b, d) ({	\
> +	typeof(a) __a = (a);			\
> +	typeof(b) __b = (b);			\
> +	typeof(d) __d = (d);			\
> +	(void) (&__a == &__b);			\
> +	(void) (&__a == __d);			\
> +	*__d = __a - __b;			\
> +	__a < __b;				\
> +})
> +/*
> + * If one of a or b is a compile-time constant, this avoids a division.
> + */
> +#define __unsigned_mul_overflow(a, b, d) ({		\
> +	typeof(a) __a = (a);				\
> +	typeof(b) __b = (b);				\
> +	typeof(d) __d = (d);				\
> +	(void) (&__a == &__b);				\
> +	(void) (&__a == __d);				\
> +	*__d = __a * __b;				\
> +	__builtin_constant_p(__b) ?			\
> +	  __b > 0 && __a > type_max(typeof(__a)) / __b : \
> +	  __a > 0 && __b > type_max(typeof(__b)) / __a;	 \
> +})
> +
> +/*
> + * For signed types, detecting overflow is much harder, especially if
> + * we want to avoid UB. But the interface of these macros is such that
> + * we must provide a result in *d, and in fact we must produce the
> + * result promised by gcc's builtins, which is simply the possibly
> + * wrapped-around value. Fortunately, we can just formally do the
> + * operations in the widest relevant unsigned type (u64) and then
> + * truncate the result - gcc is smart enough to generate the same code
> + * with and without the (u64) casts.
> + */
> +
> +/*
> + * Adding two signed integers can overflow only if they have the same
> + * sign, and overflow has happened iff the result has the opposite
> + * sign.
> + */
> +#define __signed_add_overflow(a, b, d) ({	\
> +	typeof(a) __a = (a);			\
> +	typeof(b) __b = (b);			\
> +	typeof(d) __d = (d);			\
> +	(void) (&__a == &__b);			\
> +	(void) (&__a == __d);			\
> +	*__d = (u64)__a + (u64)__b;		\
> +	(((~(__a ^ __b)) & (*__d ^ __a))	\
> +		& type_min(typeof(__a))) != 0;	\
> +})
> +
> +/*
> + * Subtraction is similar, except that overflow can now happen only
> + * when the signs are opposite. In this case, overflow has happened if
> + * the result has the opposite sign of a.
> + */
> +#define __signed_sub_overflow(a, b, d) ({	\
> +	typeof(a) __a = (a);			\
> +	typeof(b) __b = (b);			\
> +	typeof(d) __d = (d);			\
> +	(void) (&__a == &__b);			\
> +	(void) (&__a == __d);			\
> +	*__d = (u64)__a - (u64)__b;		\
> +	((((__a ^ __b)) & (*__d ^ __a))		\
> +		& type_min(typeof(__a))) != 0;	\
> +})
> +
> +/*
> + * Signed multiplication is rather hard. gcc always follows C99, so
> + * division is truncated towards 0. This means that we can write the
> + * overflow check like this:
> + *
> + * (a > 0 && (b > MAX/a || b < MIN/a)) ||
> + * (a < -1 && (b > MIN/a || b < MAX/a) ||
> + * (a == -1 && b == MIN)
> + *
> + * The redundant casts of -1 are to silence an annoying -Wtype-limits
> + * (included in -Wextra) warning: When the type is u8 or u16, the
> + * __b_c_e in check_mul_overflow obviously selects
> + * __unsigned_mul_overflow, but unfortunately gcc still parses this
> + * code and warns about the limited range of __b.
> + */
> +
> +#define __signed_mul_overflow(a, b, d) ({				\
> +	typeof(a) __a = (a);						\
> +	typeof(b) __b = (b);						\
> +	typeof(d) __d = (d);						\
> +	typeof(a) __tmax = type_max(typeof(a));				\
> +	typeof(a) __tmin = type_min(typeof(a));				\
> +	(void) (&__a == &__b);						\
> +	(void) (&__a == __d);						\
> +	*__d = (u64)__a * (u64)__b;					\
> +	(__b > 0   && (__a > __tmax/__b || __a < __tmin/__b)) ||	\
> +	(__b < (typeof(__b))-1  && (__a > __tmin/__b || __a < __tmax/__b)) || \
> +	(__b == (typeof(__b))-1 && __a == __tmin);			\
> +})
> +
> +
> +#define check_add_overflow(a, b, d)					\
> +	__builtin_choose_expr(is_signed_type(typeof(a)),		\
> +			__signed_add_overflow(a, b, d),			\
> +			__unsigned_add_overflow(a, b, d))
> +
> +#define check_sub_overflow(a, b, d)					\
> +	__builtin_choose_expr(is_signed_type(typeof(a)),		\
> +			__signed_sub_overflow(a, b, d),			\
> +			__unsigned_sub_overflow(a, b, d))
> +
> +#define check_mul_overflow(a, b, d)					\
> +	__builtin_choose_expr(is_signed_type(typeof(a)),		\
> +			__signed_mul_overflow(a, b, d),			\
> +			__unsigned_mul_overflow(a, b, d))
> +
> +/** check_shl_overflow() - Calculate a left-shifted value and check overflow
> + *
> + * @a: Value to be shifted
> + * @s: How many bits left to shift
> + * @d: Pointer to where to store the result
> + *
> + * Computes *@d = (@a << @s)
> + *
> + * Returns true if '*d' cannot hold the result or when 'a << s' doesn't
> + * make sense. Example conditions:
> + * - 'a << s' causes bits to be lost when stored in *d.
> + * - 's' is garbage (e.g. negative) or so large that the result of
> + *   'a << s' is guaranteed to be 0.
> + * - 'a' is negative.
> + * - 'a << s' sets the sign bit, if any, in '*d'.
> + *
> + * '*d' will hold the results of the attempted shift, but is not
> + * considered "safe for use" if false is returned.
> + */
> +#define check_shl_overflow(a, s, d) ({					\
> +	typeof(a) _a = a;						\
> +	typeof(s) _s = s;						\
> +	typeof(d) _d = d;						\
> +	u64 _a_full = _a;						\
> +	unsigned int _to_shift =					\
> +		is_non_negative(_s) && _s < 8 * sizeof(*d) ? _s : 0;	\
> +	*_d = (_a_full << _to_shift);					\
> +	(_to_shift != _s || is_negative(*_d) || is_negative(_a) ||	\
> +	(*_d >> _to_shift) != _a);					\
> +})
> +
> +/**
> + * array_size() - Calculate size of 2-dimensional array.
> + *
> + * @a: dimension one
> + * @b: dimension two
> + *
> + * Calculates size of 2-dimensional array: @a * @b.
> + *
> + * Returns: number of bytes needed to represent the array or SIZE_MAX on
> + * overflow.
> + */
> +static inline size_t array_size(size_t a, size_t b)
> +{
> +	size_t bytes;
> +
> +	if (check_mul_overflow(a, b, &bytes))
> +		return SIZE_MAX;
> +
> +	return bytes;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * array3_size() - Calculate size of 3-dimensional array.
> + *
> + * @a: dimension one
> + * @b: dimension two
> + * @c: dimension three
> + *
> + * Calculates size of 3-dimensional array: @a * @b * @c.
> + *
> + * Returns: number of bytes needed to represent the array or SIZE_MAX on
> + * overflow.
> + */
> +static inline size_t array3_size(size_t a, size_t b, size_t c)
> +{
> +	size_t bytes;
> +
> +	if (check_mul_overflow(a, b, &bytes))
> +		return SIZE_MAX;
> +	if (check_mul_overflow(bytes, c, &bytes))
> +		return SIZE_MAX;
> +
> +	return bytes;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Compute a*b+c, returning SIZE_MAX on overflow. Internal helper for
> + * struct_size() below.
> + */
> +static inline size_t __ab_c_size(size_t a, size_t b, size_t c)
> +{
> +	size_t bytes;
> +
> +	if (check_mul_overflow(a, b, &bytes))
> +		return SIZE_MAX;
> +	if (check_add_overflow(bytes, c, &bytes))
> +		return SIZE_MAX;
> +
> +	return bytes;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * struct_size() - Calculate size of structure with trailing array.
> + * @p: Pointer to the structure.
> + * @member: Name of the array member.
> + * @n: Number of elements in the array.
> + *
> + * Calculates size of memory needed for structure @p followed by an
> + * array of @n @member elements.
> + *
> + * Return: number of bytes needed or SIZE_MAX on overflow.
> + */
> +#define struct_size(p, member, n)					\
> +	__ab_c_size(n,							\
> +		    sizeof(*(p)->member) + __must_be_array((p)->member),\
> +		    sizeof(*(p)))
> +
> +#endif /* __LINUX_OVERFLOW_H */
> diff --git a/tests/mkfs-tests/018-multidevice-overflow/test.sh b/tests/mkfs-tests/018-multidevice-overflow/test.sh
> new file mode 100755
> index 00000000..0b550685
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/mkfs-tests/018-multidevice-overflow/test.sh
> @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
> +#!/bin/bash
> +# test if mkfs.btrfs will create file systems that overflow total_bytes
> +
> +source "$TEST_TOP/common"
> +
> +check_prereq mkfs.btrfs
> +check_prereq btrfs
> +
> +mkdev()
> +{
> +	truncate -s 0 "$1"
> +	truncate -s "$2" "$1"
> +}
> +
> +mkdev "$TEST_TOP/test-dev1.img" 6E
> +mkdev "$TEST_TOP/test-dev2.img" 6E
> +mkdev "$TEST_TOP/test-dev3.img" 6E
> +
> +run_mustfail "mkfs.btrfs for too-large images" \
> +	     "$TOP/mkfs.btrfs" -f "$TEST_TOP"/test-dev[123].img
> +
> +rm -f "$TEST_TOP"/test-dev[123].img
> 


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-14  1:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-14  1:03 [PATCH 1/5] btrfs-progs: mkfs: treat btrfs_add_to_fsid as fatal error Jeff Mahoney
2019-08-14  1:03 ` [PATCH 2/5] btrfs-progs: btrfs_add_to_fsid: check if adding device would overflow Jeff Mahoney
2019-08-14  1:50   ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2019-08-27 15:23   ` David Sterba
2019-08-14  1:04 ` [PATCH 3/5] btrfs-progs: qgroups: use parse_size instead of open coding it Jeff Mahoney
2019-08-14  1:51   ` Qu Wenruo
2019-08-14  1:04 ` [PATCH 4/5] btrfs-progs: resize: more sensible error messages for bad sizes Jeff Mahoney
2019-08-14  1:53   ` Qu Wenruo
2019-08-27 15:22     ` David Sterba
2019-08-14  1:04 ` [PATCH 5/5] btrfs-progs: mkfs: print error messages instead of just error number Jeff Mahoney
2019-08-14  1:54   ` Qu Wenruo
2019-08-14  2:30     ` Jeff Mahoney
2019-08-14  1:48 ` [PATCH 1/5] btrfs-progs: mkfs: treat btrfs_add_to_fsid as fatal error Qu Wenruo
2019-08-27 15:27 ` David Sterba
2019-08-27 15:30   ` David Sterba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0727646f-e356-2d41-5745-6fd01a2fb331@gmx.com \
    --to=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
    --cc=jeffm@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).