From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Woodhouse Subject: RE: Btrfs: broken file system design (was Unbound(?) internal fragmentation in Btrfs) Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 10:50:13 +0100 Message-ID: <1277373013.21395.0.camel@localhost> References: <4C07C321.8010000@redhat.com> <4C1B7560.1000806@gmail.com> <4C1BA3E5.7020400@gmail.com> <20100623234031.GF7058@shareable.org> <469D2D911E4BF043BFC8AD32E8E30F5B24AEBA@wdscexbe07.sc.wdc.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Cc: Daniel J Blueman , Mat , LKML , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Chris Mason , Ric Wheeler , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , The development of BTRFS To: Daniel Taylor Return-path: In-Reply-To: <469D2D911E4BF043BFC8AD32E8E30F5B24AEBA@wdscexbe07.sc.wdc.com> List-ID: On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 20:43 -0700, Daniel Taylor wrote: > There is also the issue of btrfs over RAID (which I know is not > entirely sensible, but which will happen). Well, we could discourage that by merging the RAID support that's been pending for a while.... but I suspect Chris is a bit busy right now :) -- dwmw2