From: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
To: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>, Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.de>,
dsterba@suse.cz, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: extent_io: Handle memory allocation failure in __clear_extent_bit()
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 15:27:19 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <156a2901-a5e9-7ba4-1712-42a4bd4dff8a@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a7d7c706-6e42-21bb-c42d-c60529bcd946@gmx.com>
On 18.04.19 г. 14:54 ч., Qu Wenruo wrote:
<snip>
>
> Forgot to mention, for that method, I'll definitely keep the BUG_ON() on
> @prealloc.
>
> Just make the allocation part fall back to use fs_info->last_chance[] to
> grab a valid memory slot.
Before you go and re-invent the wheel I will suggest you take a look at
the mempool api (include/linux/mempool.h). AFAIK it's purpose is to
exactly ensure memory allocations from it will not fail (depending on
how the pool is configured)
>
> Thanks,
> Qu
>
>>
>> The main reason I'm doing such error injection test is to ensure write
>> time tree checker is not the cause of the lockup.
>>
>> Of course I can directly inject error into btrfs_check_leaf_full() and
>> btrfs_check_node(), and filter the stack to ensure it only happen in
>> write time, and that's already what I'm crafting, based on the bcc error
>> inject example and kprobe return value overriding.
>>
>> But it will never be a bad idea to explore what can go wrong.
>> And "always BUG_ON()" -> "good enough (TM)" already looks like a
>> improvement to me.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Qu
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-18 12:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-18 7:21 [PATCH] btrfs: extent_io: Handle memory allocation failure in __clear_extent_bit() Qu Wenruo
2019-04-18 7:24 ` Nikolay Borisov
2019-04-18 7:30 ` Qu Wenruo
2019-04-18 11:38 ` David Sterba
2019-04-18 11:51 ` Qu Wenruo
2019-04-18 11:54 ` Qu Wenruo
2019-04-18 12:27 ` Nikolay Borisov [this message]
2019-04-18 12:44 ` Qu Wenruo
2019-04-22 5:44 ` Qu Wenruo
2019-04-18 14:10 ` Josef Bacik
2019-04-18 14:15 ` Qu Wenruo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=156a2901-a5e9-7ba4-1712-42a4bd4dff8a@suse.com \
--to=nborisov@suse.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
--cc=wqu@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).