From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tomasz Torcz Subject: Re: Btrfs for mainline Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 16:01:49 +0100 Message-ID: <20090105150149.GA9053@mother.fordon.pl.eu.org> References: <1230722935.4680.5.camel@think.oraclecorp.com> <1231057922.6497.30.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1231166153.4290.38.camel@think.oraclecorp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp" Cc: Gabor MICSKO , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org To: Chris Mason Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1231166153.4290.38.camel@think.oraclecorp.com> List-ID: --LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 09:35:53AM -0500, Chris Mason wrote: > On Sun, 2009-01-04 at 09:32 +0100, Gabor MICSKO wrote: > > Hi Chris, > >=20 > >=20 > > Does this means that disk format finalised or at least backward > > compatible? > >=20 >=20 > We're making every effort to avoid new disk format changes now (that are > not backward compatible). Only a critical bug would result in a disk > format change now. Is this means that new format is ready for RAID5-like disk layout? --=20 Tomasz Torcz Only gods can safely risk perfection, zdzichu@irc.-nie.spam-.pl it's a dangerous thing for a man. -- Alia --LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: gpg --search-keys Tomasz Torcz iEYEARECAAYFAkliIN0ACgkQ10UJr+75NrnYOQCdGihJeW72HGz0k9VZ/iRyARdx +nAAmwXhYFHLM469Shjymgbz0lQF9g3i =X6nc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp--