From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC]: mutex: adaptive spin Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 06:35:40 -0700 Message-ID: <20090107133540.GS2002@parisc-linux.org> References: <49636799.1010109@novell.com> <20090106214229.GD6741@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1231278275.11687.111.camel@twins> <1231279660.11687.121.camel@twins> <1231281801.11687.125.camel@twins> <49642829.20006@cn.fujitsu.com> <1231309970.11687.163.camel@twins> <49645B17.7000001@cn.fujitsu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Linus Torvalds , paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Gregory Haskins , Ingo Molnar , Andi Kleen , Chris Mason , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel , linux-btrfs , Thomas Gleixner , Steven Rostedt , Nick Piggin , Peter Morreale , Sven Dietrich To: Lai Jiangshan Return-path: In-Reply-To: <49645B17.7000001@cn.fujitsu.com> List-ID: On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 03:34:47PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote: > So I think current task should sleep earlier when it detects that > mutex owner start schedule(). How do you propose it detects this? -- Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step."