From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [PATCH -v7][RFC]: mutex: implement adaptive spinning Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 07:58:41 +0100 Message-ID: <20090109065841.GB26290@one.firstfloor.org> References: <20090108141808.GC11629@elte.hu> <1231426014.11687.456.camel@twins> <1231434515.14304.27.camel@think.oraclecorp.com> <20090108183306.GA22916@elte.hu> <1231444786.5715.8.camel@brick> <4966ABF9.9080409@zytor.com> <20090109033531.GR496@one.firstfloor.org> <20090108220028.3b73a509.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Andi Kleen , "H. Peter Anvin" , Harvey Harrison , Ingo Molnar , Linus Torvalds , Chris Mason , Peter Zijlstra , Steven Rostedt , paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Gregory Haskins , Matthew Wilcox , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-fsdevel , linux-btrfs , Thomas Gleixner , Nick Piggin , Peter Morreale , Sven Dietrich To: Andrew Morton Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20090108220028.3b73a509.akpm@linux-foundation.org> List-ID: > foo() > { > char a[1000]; > } > > bar() > { > char a[1000]; > } > > zot() > { > foo(); > bar(); > } > > uses 2000 bytes of stack. > And with the right compiler version. I believe that's fixed in newer gcc versions. For old gccs we might indeed need to add noinlines though. -Andi -- ak@linux.intel.com