From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Sander <sander@humilis.net>
Subject: Re: Status of BTRFS
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 16:17:18 +0200
Message-ID: <20100719141718.GA14069@attic.humilis.net>
References: <000001cb24dd$cab87650$602962f0$@com>
 <AANLkTikQ4Q2W2MII6vAo3WzBN9-d0R41ZsLkbJOkNjMS@mail.gmail.com>
 <000101cb24e0$804e4b00$80eae100$@com>
 <20100716121633.GC24361@mother.pipebreaker.pl>
 <AANLkTikYXkNqj-l0HtwWsX9anrCHMGXfRAVLdlX1a5Eo@mail.gmail.com>
 <3e17acec7537033437d2a53958052ec4.squirrel@webmail.jots.org>
Reply-To: sander@humilis.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Sebastian 'gonX' Jensen <gonx@overclocked.net>,
	Tomasz Torcz <tomek@pipebreaker.pl>,
	linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
To: Ken D'Ambrosio <ken@jots.org>,
	Edward Ned Harvey <kernel@nedharvey.com>
Return-path: <linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <3e17acec7537033437d2a53958052ec4.squirrel@webmail.jots.org>
List-ID: <linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org>

Ken D'Ambrosio wrote (ao):
> > Edward Ned Harvey wrote (ao):
> > > Is it included in any distributions yet?
> > 
> > Yes, Fedora is one of the releases that has officially supported it
> > for a while now.
> > been implemented for Arch Linux, so you might see btrfs being an
> > option for that in the next version of the installer :-)
> 
> I also believe that Ubuntu 10.10 is slated to have it; I think it's in the
> current alpha, though based on my reading, there are still some rough
> edges.

Btrfs is in Ubuntu 10.10 alpha and that installs and works oke is my
experience.

	Sander

-- 
Humilis IT Services and Solutions
http://www.humilis.net