From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Cc: NeilBrown <neil@brown.name>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
bfields@fieldses.org, neilb@suse.de, jack@suse.de,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu,
adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
darrick.wong@oracle.com, david@fromorbit.com,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, clm@fb.com, jbacik@fb.com,
dsterba@suse.com, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com,
linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, dhowells@redhat.com,
jaltman@auristor.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/19] fs: new API for handling inode->i_version
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2018 18:01:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180102170107.GC4911@quack2.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1513986897.21071.2.camel@kernel.org>
On Fri 22-12-17 18:54:57, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-12-23 at 10:14 +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
> > > +#include <linux/fs.h>
> > > +
> > > +/*
> > > + * The change attribute (i_version) is mandated by NFSv4 and is mostly for
> > > + * knfsd, but is also used for other purposes (e.g. IMA). The i_version must
> > > + * appear different to observers if there was a change to the inode's data or
> > > + * metadata since it was last queried.
> > > + *
> > > + * It should be considered an opaque value by observers. If it remains the same
> >
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >
> > You keep using that word ... I don't think it means what you think it
> > means.
> > Change that sentence to:
> >
> > Observers see i_version as a 64 number which never decreases.
> >
> > and the rest still makes perfect sense.
> >
>
> Thanks! Fixed in my tree. I'll not resend the set just for that though.
With this fixed the patch looks good to me. You can add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-02 17:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-22 12:05 [PATCH v4 00/19] fs: rework and optimize i_version handling in filesystems Jeff Layton
2017-12-22 12:05 ` [PATCH v4 01/19] fs: new API for handling inode->i_version Jeff Layton
2017-12-22 23:14 ` NeilBrown
2017-12-22 23:54 ` Jeff Layton
2018-01-02 17:01 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2017-12-22 12:05 ` [PATCH v4 02/19] fs: don't take the i_lock in inode_inc_iversion Jeff Layton
2017-12-22 12:05 ` [PATCH v4 03/19] fat: convert to new i_version API Jeff Layton
2017-12-22 12:05 ` [PATCH v4 04/19] affs: " Jeff Layton
2017-12-22 12:05 ` [PATCH v4 05/19] afs: " Jeff Layton
2017-12-22 12:05 ` [PATCH v4 06/19] btrfs: " Jeff Layton
2017-12-22 12:05 ` [PATCH v4 07/19] exofs: switch " Jeff Layton
2017-12-22 12:05 ` [PATCH v4 08/19] ext2: convert " Jeff Layton
2017-12-22 12:05 ` [PATCH v4 09/19] ext4: " Jeff Layton
2017-12-22 12:05 ` [PATCH v4 10/19] nfs: " Jeff Layton
2017-12-22 12:05 ` [PATCH v4 11/19] nfsd: " Jeff Layton
2017-12-22 12:05 ` [PATCH v4 12/19] ocfs2: " Jeff Layton
2017-12-22 12:05 ` [PATCH v4 13/19] ufs: use " Jeff Layton
2017-12-22 12:05 ` [PATCH v4 14/19] xfs: convert to " Jeff Layton
2017-12-23 0:05 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-12-22 12:05 ` [PATCH v4 15/19] IMA: switch IMA over " Jeff Layton
2017-12-22 12:05 ` [PATCH v4 16/19] fs: only set S_VERSION when updating times if necessary Jeff Layton
2018-01-02 16:50 ` Jan Kara
2017-12-22 12:05 ` [PATCH v4 17/19] xfs: avoid setting XFS_ILOG_CORE if i_version doesn't need incrementing Jeff Layton
2017-12-23 0:07 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-12-22 12:05 ` [PATCH v4 18/19] btrfs: only dirty the inode in btrfs_update_time if something was changed Jeff Layton
2017-12-22 12:05 ` [PATCH v4 19/19] fs: handle inode->i_version more efficiently Jeff Layton
2018-01-02 17:00 ` Jan Kara
2018-01-02 17:20 ` [PATCH v4 05/19] afs: convert to new i_version API David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180102170107.GC4911@quack2.suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=jack@suse.de \
--cc=jaltman@auristor.com \
--cc=jbacik@fb.com \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-afs@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neil@brown.name \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).