linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
To: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
	Wang Xiaoguang <wangxg.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de>,
	Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15.1 04/13] btrfs: dedupe: Introduce function to remove hash from in-memory tree
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2018 16:17:23 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181109211723.fclu6e3mtzs3xcn3@macbook-pro-91.dhcp.thefacebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181106064122.6154-5-lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>

On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 02:41:13PM +0800, Lu Fengqi wrote:
> From: Wang Xiaoguang <wangxg.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
> 
> Introduce static function inmem_del() to remove hash from in-memory
> dedupe tree.
> And implement btrfs_dedupe_del() and btrfs_dedup_disable() interfaces.
> 
> Also for btrfs_dedupe_disable(), add new functions to wait existing
> writer and block incoming writers to eliminate all possible race.
> 
> Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de>
> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wang Xiaoguang <wangxg.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
>  fs/btrfs/dedupe.c | 131 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 125 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/dedupe.c b/fs/btrfs/dedupe.c
> index 784bb3a8a5ab..951fefd19fde 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/dedupe.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/dedupe.c
> @@ -170,12 +170,6 @@ int btrfs_dedupe_enable(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> -int btrfs_dedupe_disable(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
> -{
> -	/* Place holder for bisect, will be implemented in later patches */
> -	return 0;
> -}
> -
>  static int inmem_insert_hash(struct rb_root *root,
>  			     struct inmem_hash *hash, int hash_len)
>  {
> @@ -317,3 +311,128 @@ int btrfs_dedupe_add(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
>  		return inmem_add(dedupe_info, hash);
>  	return -EINVAL;
>  }
> +
> +static struct inmem_hash *
> +inmem_search_bytenr(struct btrfs_dedupe_info *dedupe_info, u64 bytenr)
> +{
> +	struct rb_node **p = &dedupe_info->bytenr_root.rb_node;
> +	struct rb_node *parent = NULL;
> +	struct inmem_hash *entry = NULL;
> +
> +	while (*p) {
> +		parent = *p;
> +		entry = rb_entry(parent, struct inmem_hash, bytenr_node);
> +
> +		if (bytenr < entry->bytenr)
> +			p = &(*p)->rb_left;
> +		else if (bytenr > entry->bytenr)
> +			p = &(*p)->rb_right;
> +		else
> +			return entry;
> +	}
> +
> +	return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +/* Delete a hash from in-memory dedupe tree */
> +static int inmem_del(struct btrfs_dedupe_info *dedupe_info, u64 bytenr)
> +{
> +	struct inmem_hash *hash;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&dedupe_info->lock);
> +	hash = inmem_search_bytenr(dedupe_info, bytenr);
> +	if (!hash) {
> +		mutex_unlock(&dedupe_info->lock);
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	__inmem_del(dedupe_info, hash);
> +	mutex_unlock(&dedupe_info->lock);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/* Remove a dedupe hash from dedupe tree */
> +int btrfs_dedupe_del(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 bytenr)
> +{
> +	struct btrfs_dedupe_info *dedupe_info = fs_info->dedupe_info;
> +
> +	if (!fs_info->dedupe_enabled)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	if (WARN_ON(dedupe_info == NULL))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	if (dedupe_info->backend == BTRFS_DEDUPE_BACKEND_INMEMORY)
> +		return inmem_del(dedupe_info, bytenr);
> +	return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
> +static void inmem_destroy(struct btrfs_dedupe_info *dedupe_info)
> +{
> +	struct inmem_hash *entry, *tmp;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&dedupe_info->lock);
> +	list_for_each_entry_safe(entry, tmp, &dedupe_info->lru_list, lru_list)
> +		__inmem_del(dedupe_info, entry);
> +	mutex_unlock(&dedupe_info->lock);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Helper function to wait and block all incoming writers
> + *
> + * Use rw_sem introduced for freeze to wait/block writers.
> + * So during the block time, no new write will happen, so we can
> + * do something quite safe, espcially helpful for dedupe disable,
> + * as it affect buffered write.
> + */
> +static void block_all_writers(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
> +{
> +	struct super_block *sb = fs_info->sb;
> +
> +	percpu_down_write(sb->s_writers.rw_sem + SB_FREEZE_WRITE - 1);
> +	down_write(&sb->s_umount);
> +}
> +
> +static void unblock_all_writers(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
> +{
> +	struct super_block *sb = fs_info->sb;
> +
> +	up_write(&sb->s_umount);
> +	percpu_up_write(sb->s_writers.rw_sem + SB_FREEZE_WRITE - 1);
> +}

Please use the sb_ helpers, don't open code this.

> +
> +int btrfs_dedupe_disable(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
> +{
> +	struct btrfs_dedupe_info *dedupe_info;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	dedupe_info = fs_info->dedupe_info;
> +
> +	if (!dedupe_info)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	/* Don't allow disable status change in RO mount */
> +	if (fs_info->sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY)
> +		return -EROFS;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Wait for all unfinished writers and block further writers.
> +	 * Then sync the whole fs so all current write will go through
> +	 * dedupe, and all later write won't go through dedupe.
> +	 */
> +	block_all_writers(fs_info);
> +	ret = sync_filesystem(fs_info->sb);
> +	fs_info->dedupe_enabled = 0;
> +	fs_info->dedupe_info = NULL;
> +	unblock_all_writers(fs_info);

This is awful, don't do this.  Thanks,

Josef

  reply	other threads:[~2018-11-09 21:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-06  6:41 [PATCH v15.1 00/13] Btrfs In-band De-duplication Lu Fengqi
2018-11-06  6:41 ` [PATCH v15.1 01/13] btrfs: dedupe: Introduce dedupe framework and its header Lu Fengqi
2018-11-08  9:53   ` Timofey Titovets
2018-11-09 21:10   ` Josef Bacik
2018-11-06  6:41 ` [PATCH v15.1 02/13] btrfs: dedupe: Introduce function to initialize dedupe info Lu Fengqi
2018-11-08 12:31   ` Timofey Titovets
2018-11-06  6:41 ` [PATCH v15.1 03/13] btrfs: dedupe: Introduce function to add hash into in-memory tree Lu Fengqi
2018-11-08 20:18   ` Timofey Titovets
2018-11-06  6:41 ` [PATCH v15.1 04/13] btrfs: dedupe: Introduce function to remove hash from " Lu Fengqi
2018-11-09 21:17   ` Josef Bacik [this message]
2018-11-06  6:41 ` [PATCH v15.1 05/13] btrfs: delayed-ref: Add support for increasing data ref under spinlock Lu Fengqi
2018-11-06  6:41 ` [PATCH v15.1 06/13] btrfs: dedupe: Introduce function to search for an existing hash Lu Fengqi
2018-11-06  6:41 ` [PATCH v15.1 07/13] btrfs: dedupe: Implement btrfs_dedupe_calc_hash interface Lu Fengqi
2018-11-06  6:41 ` [PATCH v15.1 08/13] btrfs: ordered-extent: Add support for dedupe Lu Fengqi
2018-11-06  6:41 ` [PATCH v15.1 09/13] btrfs: introduce type based delalloc metadata reserve Lu Fengqi
2018-11-06  6:41 ` [PATCH v15.1 10/13] btrfs: dedupe: Inband in-memory only de-duplication implement Lu Fengqi
2018-11-06  6:41 ` [PATCH v15.1 11/13] btrfs: dedupe: Add ioctl for inband deduplication Lu Fengqi
2018-11-06  6:41 ` [PATCH v15.1 12/13] btrfs: relocation: Enhance error handling to avoid BUG_ON Lu Fengqi
2018-11-06  6:41 ` [PATCH v15.1 13/13] btrfs: dedupe: Introduce new reconfigure ioctl Lu Fengqi
2018-11-10  7:21 ` [PATCH v15.1 00/13] Btrfs In-band De-duplication Anand Jain
2018-11-13 13:45 ` David Sterba
2018-11-14  3:47   ` Lu Fengqi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181109211723.fclu6e3mtzs3xcn3@macbook-pro-91.dhcp.thefacebook.com \
    --to=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=mfasheh@suse.de \
    --cc=quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=wangxg.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).