Linux-BTRFS Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
To: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Cc: dsterba@suse.cz, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, jeffm@suse.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/15] btrfs: Honour FITRIM range constraints during free space trim
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2019 16:48:20 +0100
Message-ID: <20190131154820.GJ2900@twin.jikos.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ef5b4561-8337-a28a-4419-98e8f1e20e73@suse.com>

On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 05:35:10PM +0200, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> On 31.01.19 г. 17:21 ч., David Sterba wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 04:50:48PM +0200, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> >> Up until know trimming the freespace was done irrespective of what the
> >> arguments of the FITRIM ioctl were. For example fstrim's -o/-l arguments
> >> will be entirely ignored. Fix it by correctly handling those paramter.
> >> This requires breaking if the found freespace extent is after the end
> >> of the passed range as well as completing trim after trimming
> >> fstrim_range::len bytes.
> > 
> > How does this work with with multipe-device filesystems? The fstrim
> > range would apply to all of them. Which does make some sense, though
> > might be unexpected as this does not happen for other filesystems.
> 
> Well FITRIM doesn't have support for multiple device so it's to the
> discretion of the fs how exactly this is implemented. And this is indeed
> the way things work currently.
> 
> > The FITRIM range is in the physical coordinates, so eg. the taking the
> > maximum size of all devices and iterating over that by 1GiB steps would
> > go though the whole filesystem. Something to put to the changelog and
> > documentation.
> 
> I don't follow, trimming would just trim the physical range as passed by
> fstrim -o/-l options. That 1gb value is not hardcoded anywhere. If
> someone wants to trim all of the freespace (which is what the majority
> of the user do) then they can run FITRIM with 0 for offset and -1 for
> length.

Yeah but I wanted to give an example of usecase when the range is not
0/-1 and how this is could to be used.

  reply index

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-30 14:50 [PATCH 00/15] Improvements to fitrim Nikolay Borisov
2019-01-30 14:50 ` [PATCH 01/15] btrfs: Honour FITRIM range constraints during free space trim Nikolay Borisov
2019-01-31 15:21   ` David Sterba
2019-01-31 15:35     ` Nikolay Borisov
2019-01-31 15:48       ` David Sterba [this message]
2019-01-31 19:30       ` Jeff Mahoney
2019-01-31 21:45         ` Nikolay Borisov
2019-01-30 14:50 ` [PATCH 02/15] btrfs: Make WARN_ON in a canonical form Nikolay Borisov
2019-01-31 15:22   ` David Sterba
2019-02-04 13:12   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-01-30 14:50 ` [PATCH 03/15] btrfs: Remove EXTENT_FIRST_DELALLOC bit Nikolay Borisov
2019-01-31 15:23   ` David Sterba
2019-02-04 13:15   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-01-30 14:50 ` [PATCH 04/15] btrfs: combine device update operations during transaction commit Nikolay Borisov
2019-02-04 13:25   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-02-04 14:48     ` Nikolay Borisov
2019-02-05  9:21       ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-01-30 14:50 ` [PATCH 05/15] btrfs: Handle pending/pinned chunks before blockgroup relocation during device shrink Nikolay Borisov
2019-02-04 13:29   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-01-30 14:50 ` [PATCH 06/15] btrfs: Rename and export clear_btree_io_tree Nikolay Borisov
2019-02-04 13:31   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-01-30 14:50 ` [PATCH 07/15] btrfs: Populate ->orig_block_len during read_one_chunk Nikolay Borisov
2019-01-30 14:50 ` [PATCH 08/15] btrfs: Introduce new bits for device allocation tree Nikolay Borisov
2019-01-30 14:50 ` [PATCH 09/15] btrfs: replace pending/pinned chunks lists with io tree Nikolay Borisov
2019-01-30 14:50 ` [PATCH 10/15] btrfs: Remove 'trans' argument from find_free_dev_extent(_start) Nikolay Borisov
2019-02-04 14:36   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-01-30 14:50 ` [PATCH 11/15] btrfs: Factor out in_range macro Nikolay Borisov
2019-02-04 13:57   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-01-30 14:50 ` [PATCH 12/15] btrfs: Optimize unallocated chunks discard Nikolay Borisov
2019-01-30 14:51 ` [PATCH 13/15] btrfs: Fix gross misnaming Nikolay Borisov
2019-01-30 14:51 ` [PATCH 14/15] btrfs: Implement find_first_clear_extent_bit Nikolay Borisov
2019-02-04 14:04   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-02-04 16:57   ` Nikolay Borisov
2019-01-30 14:51 ` [PATCH 15/15] btrfs: Switch btrfs_trim_free_extents to find_first_clear_extent_bit Nikolay Borisov
2019-01-31 15:38   ` [PATCH v2] " Nikolay Borisov
2019-01-31 15:41   ` [PATCH v3] " Nikolay Borisov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190131154820.GJ2900@twin.jikos.cz \
    --to=dsterba@suse.cz \
    --cc=jeffm@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nborisov@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Linux-BTRFS Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/0 linux-btrfs/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 linux-btrfs linux-btrfs/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs \
		linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org linux-btrfs@archiver.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index linux-btrfs


Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.linux-btrfs


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/ public-inbox