linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	kernel-team@fb.com, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] Allow setting file birth time with utimensat()
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 09:06:26 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190214220626.GV14116@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1550136164.git.osandov@fb.com>

On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 02:00:07AM -0800, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Since statx was added in 4.11, userspace has had an interface for
> reading btime (file creation time), but no way to set it. This RFC patch
> series adds support for changing btime with utimensat(). Patch 1 adds
> the VFS infrastructure, patch 2 adds the support to utimensat() with a
> new flag, and the rest of the patches add filesystem support; I excluded
> CIFS for now because I don't have a CIFS setup to test it on.
> 
> Updating btime is useful for at least a couple of use cases:
> 
> - Backup/restore programs (my motivation for this feature is btrfs send)
> - File servers which interoperate with operating systems that allow
>   updating file creation time, including Mac OS [1] and Windows [2]

So you're adding an interface that allows users to change the create
time of files without needing any privileges?

Inode create time is forensic metadata in XFS  - information we use
for sequence of event and inode lifetime analysis during examination
of broken filesystem images and systems that have been broken into.
Just because it's exposed to userspace via statx(), it doesn't mean
that it is information that users should be allowed to change. i.e.
allowing users to be able to change the create time on files makes
it completely useless for the purpose it was added to XFS for...

And allowing root to change the create time doesn't really help,
because once you've broken into a system, this makes it really easy
to cover tracks (e.g. we can't find files that were created and
unlinked during the break in window anymore) and lay false
trails....

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-02-14 22:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-14 10:00 [RFC PATCH 0/6] Allow setting file birth time with utimensat() Omar Sandoval
2019-02-14 10:00 ` [RFC PATCH 1/6] fs: add btime to struct iattr Omar Sandoval
2019-02-14 10:00 ` [RFC PATCH 2/6] fs: add AT_UTIME_BTIME for utimensat() Omar Sandoval
2019-02-14 10:00 ` [RFC PATCH 3/6] Btrfs: add support for setting btime Omar Sandoval
2019-02-14 10:00 ` [RFC PATCH 4/6] ext4: " Omar Sandoval
2019-02-14 10:00 ` [RFC PATCH 5/6] f2fs: " Omar Sandoval
2019-02-14 10:00 ` [RFC PATCH 6/6] xfs: " Omar Sandoval
2019-02-14 10:00 ` [PATCH] generic: add a test for AT_UTIME_BTIME Omar Sandoval
2019-02-14 10:00 ` [PATCH] utimensat2: document AT_UTIME_BTIME Omar Sandoval
2019-02-14 10:00 ` [PATCH] xfs_io: add AT_UTIME_BTIME support Omar Sandoval
2019-02-14 22:06 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2019-02-14 23:14   ` [RFC PATCH 0/6] Allow setting file birth time with utimensat() Omar Sandoval
2019-02-15  0:16     ` Dave Chinner
2019-02-15  6:59       ` Omar Sandoval
2019-02-15 13:57         ` David Disseldorp
2019-02-17  1:57         ` Andreas Dilger
2019-02-18 22:18           ` Dave Chinner
2019-02-22 19:00             ` Omar Sandoval
2019-02-23 18:32               ` Andreas Dilger
2019-02-17 16:35   ` Boaz Harrosh
2019-02-17 17:54     ` Adam Borowski
2019-02-17 20:40       ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-02-19  4:04         ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-02-19  4:28           ` Dave Chinner
2019-02-20  7:47     ` Andreas Dilger
2019-02-15  1:57 ` Hans van Kranenburg
2019-02-15  5:39   ` Omar Sandoval
2019-02-15 18:25     ` Hans van Kranenburg
2019-02-22 15:02 ` David Sterba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190214220626.GV14116@dastard \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=osandov@osandov.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).