Linux-BTRFS Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: fdmanana@kernel.org
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: josef@toxicpanda.com, Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] Btrfs: fix negative subv_writers counter and data space leak after buffered write
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 16:41:20 +0100
Message-ID: <20191011154120.5547-1-fdmanana@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191009164422.7202-1-fdmanana@kernel.org>

From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>

When doing a buffered write it's possible to leave the subv_writers
counter of the root, used for synchronization between buffered nocow
writers and snapshotting. This happens in an exceptional case like the
following:

1) We fail to allocate data space for the write, since there's not
   enough available data space nor enough unallocated space for allocating
   a new data block group;

2) Because of that failure, we try to go to NOCOW mode, which succeeds
   and therefore we set the local variable 'only_release_metadata' to true
   and set the root's sub_writers counter to 1 through the call to
   btrfs_start_write_no_snapshotting() made by check_can_nocow();

3) The call to btrfs_copy_from_user() returns zero, which is very unlikely
   to happen but not impossible;

4) No pages are copied because btrfs_copy_from_user() returned zero;

5) We call btrfs_end_write_no_snapshotting() which decrements the root's
   subv_writers counter to 0;

6) We don't set 'only_release_metadata' back to 'false' because we do
   it only if 'copied', the value returned by btrfs_copy_from_user(), is
   greater than zero;

7) On the next iteration of the while loop, which processes the same
   page range, we are now able to allocate data space for the write (we
   got enough data space released in the meanwhile);

8) After this if we fail at btrfs_delalloc_reserve_metadata(), because
   now there isn't enough free metadata space, or in some other place
   further below (prepare_pages(), lock_and_cleanup_extent_if_need(),
   btrfs_dirty_pages()), we break out of the while loop with
   'only_release_metadata' having a value of 'true';

9) Because 'only_release_metadata' is 'true' we end up decrementing the
   root's subv_writers counter to -1 (through a call to
   btrfs_end_write_no_snapshotting()), and we also end up not releasing the
   data space previously reserved through btrfs_check_data_free_space().
   As a consequence the mechanism for synchronizing NOCOW buffered writes
   with snapshotting gets broken.

Fix this by always setting 'only_release_metadata' to false at the start
of each iteration.

Fixes: 8257b2dc3c1a10 ("Btrfs: introduce btrfs_{start, end}_nocow_write() for each subvolume")
Fixes: 7ee9e4405f264e ("Btrfs: check if we can nocow if we don't have data space")
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
---

V2: Moved assignment of false to only_release_metadata to the beginning of
    loop instead. And another "Fixes:" tag that corresponds to the data
    space leak, since the other if for counter dropping to -1 bug.

 fs/btrfs/file.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file.c b/fs/btrfs/file.c
index 27e5b269e729..352928b45d2a 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/file.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/file.c
@@ -1636,6 +1636,7 @@ static noinline ssize_t btrfs_buffered_write(struct kiocb *iocb,
 			break;
 		}
 
+		only_release_metadata = false;
 		sector_offset = pos & (fs_info->sectorsize - 1);
 		reserve_bytes = round_up(write_bytes + sector_offset,
 				fs_info->sectorsize);
@@ -1792,7 +1793,6 @@ static noinline ssize_t btrfs_buffered_write(struct kiocb *iocb,
 			set_extent_bit(&BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree, lockstart,
 				       lockend, EXTENT_NORESERVE, NULL,
 				       NULL, GFP_NOFS);
-			only_release_metadata = false;
 		}
 
 		btrfs_drop_pages(pages, num_pages);
-- 
2.11.0


  parent reply index

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-09 16:44 [PATCH] " fdmanana
2019-10-11 13:27 ` Josef Bacik
2019-10-11 15:40   ` Filipe Manana
2019-10-11 15:41 ` fdmanana [this message]
2019-10-11 17:14   ` [PATCH v2] " Josef Bacik
2019-10-11 18:23   ` David Sterba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191011154120.5547-1-fdmanana@kernel.org \
    --to=fdmanana@kernel.org \
    --cc=fdmanana@suse.com \
    --cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Linux-BTRFS Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/0 linux-btrfs/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 linux-btrfs linux-btrfs/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs \
		linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org linux-btrfs@archiver.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index linux-btrfs

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.linux-btrfs


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/ public-inbox