From: Zygo Blaxell <ce3g8jdj@umail.furryterror.org>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Decoding "unable to fixup (regular)" errors
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2019 17:25:57 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191108222557.GT22121@hungrycats.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1374130535.78772.1573251716407.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3068 bytes --]
On Fri, Nov 08, 2019 at 11:21:56PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> > btrfs found corrupted data on md1. You appear to be using btrfs
> > -dsingle on a single mdadm raid1 device, so no recovery is possible
> > ("unable to fixup").
> >
> >> The system has ECC memory with md1 being a RAID1 which passes all health checks.
> >
> > mdadm doesn't have any way to repair data corruption--it can find
> > differences, but it cannot identify which version of the data is correct.
> > If one of your drives is corrupting data without reporting IO errors,
> > mdadm will simply copy the corruption to the other drive. If one
> > drive is failing by intermittently injecting corrupted bits into reads
> > (e.g. because of a failure in the RAM on the drive control board),
> > this behavior may not show up in mdadm health checks.
>
> Well, this is not cheap hardware...
> Possible, but not very likely IMHO
Even the disks? We see RAM failures in disk drive embedded boards from
time to time.
> >> I tried to find the inodes behind the erroneous addresses without success.
> >> e.g.
> >> $ btrfs inspect-internal logical-resolve -v -P 593483341824 /
> >> ioctl ret=0, total_size=4096, bytes_left=4080, bytes_missing=0, cnt=0, missed=0
> >> $ echo $?
> >> 1
> >
> > That usually means the file is deleted, or the specific blocks referenced
> > have been overwritten (i.e. there are no references to the given block in
> > any existing file, but a reference to the extent containing the block
> > still exists). Although it's not possible to reach those blocks by
> > reading a file, a scrub or balance will still hit the corrupted blocks.
> >
> > You can try adding or subtracting multiples of 4096 to the block number
> > to see if you get a hint about which inodes reference this extent.
> > The first block found in either direction should be a reference to the
> > same extent, though there's no easy way (other than dumping the extent
> > tree with 'btrfs ins dump-tree -t 2' and searching for the extent record
> > containing the block number) to figure out which. Extents can be up to
> > 128MB long, i.e. 32768 blocks.
>
> Thanks for the hint!
>
> > Or modify 'btrfs ins log' to use LOGICAL_INO_V2 and the IGNORE_OFFSETS
> > flag.
> >
> >> My kernel is 4.12.14-lp150.12.64-default (OpenSUSE 15.0), so not super recent
> >> but AFAICT btrfs should be sane
> >> there. :-)
> >
> > I don't know of specific problems with csums in 4.12, but I'd upgrade that
> > for a dozen other reasons anyway. One of those is that LOGICAL_INO_V2
> > was merged in 4.15.
> >
> >> What could cause the errors and how to dig further?
> >
> > Probably a silent data corruption on one of the underlying disks.
> > If you convert this mdadm raid1 to btrfs raid1, btrfs will tell you
> > which disk the errors are coming from while also correcting them.
>
> Hmm, I don't really buy this reasoning. Like I said, this is not
> cheap/consumer hardware.
>
> Thanks,
> //richard
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-08 22:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-05 22:03 Decoding "unable to fixup (regular)" errors Richard Weinberger
2019-11-08 22:06 ` Richard Weinberger
2019-11-08 22:16 ` Zygo Blaxell
2019-11-08 22:09 ` Zygo Blaxell
2019-11-08 22:21 ` Richard Weinberger
2019-11-08 22:25 ` Zygo Blaxell [this message]
2019-11-08 22:31 ` Richard Weinberger
2019-11-08 23:39 ` Zygo Blaxell
2019-11-09 9:58 ` checksum errors in orphaned blocks on multiple systems (Was: Re: Decoding "unable to fixup (regular)" errors) Richard Weinberger
2019-11-13 3:34 ` Zygo Blaxell
2019-11-09 10:00 ` Decoding "unable to fixup (regular)" errors Richard Weinberger
2019-11-13 3:31 ` Zygo Blaxell
2019-11-13 18:17 ` Chris Murphy
2019-11-13 18:24 ` Chris Murphy
2019-11-16 6:16 ` Zygo Blaxell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191108222557.GT22121@hungrycats.org \
--to=ce3g8jdj@umail.furryterror.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).